MTN
Vail Resorts, Inc.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$4.48B
5Y Perf.-36.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MTN vs PRKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PRKS
United Parks & Resorts Inc.
Leisure
Market Cap$2.02B
5Y Perf.+105.2%
MTN vs PRKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MTN | PRKS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $4.48B | $2.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.92B | $1.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $231M | $168M |
| Gross Margin | 59.1% | 92.3% |
| Operating Margin | 26.4% | 22.0% |
| Forward P/E | 26.4x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $3.44B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $440M | $100M |
MTN vs PRKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MTN
PRKS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) | 100 | 63.2 | -36.8% |
| United Parks & Reso… (PRKS) | 100 | 205.2 | +105.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MTN vs PRKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MTN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. United Parks & Resorts Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MTN
Vail Resorts, Inc.
The Income Pick
MTN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 7.0%
- Rev growth 2.7%, EPS growth 24.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, current ratio 0.63x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PRKS
United Parks & Resorts Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
PRKS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 103.5% 10Y total return vs MTN's 41.7%
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 26.4x)
- 10.1% margin vs MTN's 7.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MTN | 2.7% revenue growth vs PRKS's -3.6% |
| Value | PRKS | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 26.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | PRKS | 10.1% margin vs MTN's 7.9% |
| Stability / Safety | MTN | Beta 0.71 vs PRKS's 1.54 |
| Dividends | MTN | 7.0% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MTN | -3.8% vs PRKS's -18.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | PRKS | 6.4% ROA vs MTN's 4.0%, ROIC 25.5% vs 11.2% |
MTN vs PRKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2024
MTN vs PRKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPRKSLAGGINGMTN
MTNVail Resorts, Inc.
2leads
PRKSUnited Parks & Resort…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MTNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
PRKS4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PRKS5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
PRKS5/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
PRKS5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
MTN2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
MTN1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MTN is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.9B annually — 1.8x PRKS's $1.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 10.1% (PRKS) to 7.9% (MTN).
| Metric | MTNVail Resorts, Inc. | PRKSUnited Parks & Re… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $540M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $231M | $168M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $286M | $263M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.1% | +92.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.4% | +22.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +10.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.7% | -2.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.8% | -44.0% |
PRKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PRKS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, PRKS trades at a 27% valuation discount to MTN's 16.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PRKS's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MTN's 8.7x.
| Metric | MTNVail Resorts, Inc. | PRKSUnited Parks & Re… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.5B | $1.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.64x | 12.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 26.39x | 9.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.65x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.74x | 3.56x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 1.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.18x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.02x | 7.68x |
PRKS leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRKS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MTN scores 7/9 vs PRKS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | MTNVail Resorts, Inc. | PRKSUnited Parks & Re… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +29.7% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.2% | +25.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.9% | +15.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.57x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.0B | -$100M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $440M | $100M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.4B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.16x | 2.69x |
PRKS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRKS five years ago would be worth $6,903 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,208 for MTN. Over the past 12 months, MTN leads with a -3.8% total return vs PRKS's -18.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRKS at -13.1% vs MTN's -14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MTNVail Resorts, Inc. | PRKSUnited Parks & Re… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.8% | +2.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.8% | -18.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.7% | -34.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.9% | -31.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +41.7% | +103.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.1% | -13.1% |
PRKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTN is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRKS's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTN currently trades 71.4% from its 52-week high vs PRKS's 65.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MTNVail Resorts, Inc. | PRKSUnited Parks & Re… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 1.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $175.51 | $56.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $118.51 | $28.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.4% | +65.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 848K | 944K |
MTN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
MTN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MTN as "Buy" and PRKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.3% upside for MTN (target: $170) vs 28.4% for PRKS (target: $48). MTN is the only dividend payer here at 7.04% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | MTNVail Resorts, Inc. | PRKSUnited Parks & Re… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $169.50 | $47.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $8.82 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.0% | +0.8% |
MTN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
PRKS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MTN leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).
Best OverallUnited Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MTN vs PRKS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MTN or PRKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vail Resorts, Inc.
(MTN) is the stronger pick with 2. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (10. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MTN or PRKS?
On trailing P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) is the cheapest at 12. 1x versus Vail Resorts, Inc. at 16. 6x. On forward P/E, United Parks & Resorts Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MTN or PRKS?
Over the past 5 years, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) delivered a total return of -31. 0%, compared to -47. 9% for Vail Resorts, Inc. (MTN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRKS returned +103. 5% versus MTN's +41. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MTN or PRKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vail Resorts, Inc.
(MTN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 71β versus United Parks & Resorts Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning PRKS is approximately 116% more volatile than MTN relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — MTN or PRKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vail Resorts, Inc.
(MTN) is pulling ahead at 2. 7% versus -3. 6% for United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vail Resorts, Inc. grew EPS 24. 1% year-over-year, compared to -19. 3% for United Parks & Resorts Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTN leads at 5. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MTN or PRKS?
United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 1% net margin versus 9. 4% for Vail Resorts, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRKS leads at 22. 0% versus 18. 9% for MTN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRKS leads at 92. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MTN or PRKS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, United Parks & Resorts Inc.
(PRKS) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 26. 4x for Vail Resorts, Inc. — 16. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MTN: 35. 3% to $169. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MTN or PRKS?
In this comparison, MTN (7.
0% yield) pays a dividend. PRKS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MTN or PRKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vail Resorts, Inc.
(MTN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 71), 7. 0% yield). United Parks & Resorts Inc. (PRKS) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTN: +41. 7%, PRKS: +103. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MTN and PRKS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
MTN pays a dividend while PRKS does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MTN: -4.7% · PRKS: -2.8%)Net Margin>
%
(MTN: 7.9% · PRKS: 10.1%)P/E Ratio<
x
(MTN: 16.6x · PRKS: 12.1x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.