Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MTRX vs GLDD vs PRIM vs MYRG vs WLDN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
MTRX vs GLDD vs PRIM vs MYRG vs WLDN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $342M | $1.14B | $5.86B | $6.65B | $1.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $845M | $888M | $7.49B | $3.82B | $684M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-15M | $73M | $248M | $142M | $56M |
| Gross Margin | 6.2% | 22.9% | 10.4% | 11.9% | 38.2% |
| Operating Margin | -1.8% | 14.1% | 4.9% | 5.1% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | 143.1x | 15.4x | 18.1x | 44.0x | 18.1x |
| Total Debt | $21M | $458M | $1.28B | $104M | $69M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $225M | $13M | $541M | $150M | $66M |
MTRX vs GLDD vs PRIM vs MYRG vs WLDN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matrix Service Comp… (MTRX) | 100 | 110.3 | +10.3% |
| Great Lakes Dredge … (GLDD) | 100 | 183.4 | +83.4% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 647.2 | +547.2% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 1483.4 | +1383.4% |
| Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) | 100 | 304.6 | +204.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MTRX vs GLDD vs PRIM vs MYRG vs WLDN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MTRX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.62, Low D/E 15.0%, current ratio 0.96x
GLDD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.92
- Beta 0.92, current ratio 0.97x
- Lower P/E (15.4x vs 18.1x)
- 8.3% margin vs MTRX's -1.8%
PRIM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.98 vs GLDD's 9.93
- 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
MYRG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 16.8% 10Y total return vs WLDN's 5.8%
- +175.2% vs MTRX's -0.8%
WLDN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 120.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.7%
- 20.5% revenue growth vs MTRX's 5.6%
- 11.0% ROA vs MTRX's -2.4%, ROIC 11.5% vs -479.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs MTRX's 5.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.4x vs 18.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs MTRX's -1.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs WLDN's 1.96 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +175.2% vs MTRX's -0.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.0% ROA vs MTRX's -2.4%, ROIC 11.5% vs -479.8% |
MTRX vs GLDD vs PRIM vs MYRG vs WLDN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MTRX vs GLDD vs PRIM vs MYRG vs WLDN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GLDD leads in 3 of 6 categories
MYRG leads 2 • MTRX leads 0 • PRIM leads 0 • WLDN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLDD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 10.9x WLDN's $684M. GLDD is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MTRX's -1.8%. On growth, GLDD holds the edge at +26.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $845M | $888M | $7.5B | $3.8B | $684M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $169M | $437M | $261M | $64M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$15M | $73M | $248M | $142M | $56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $50M | $99M | $165M | $231M | $43M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +22.9% | +10.4% | +11.9% | +38.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | +14.1% | +4.9% | +5.1% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | +8.3% | +3.3% | +3.7% | +8.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +11.2% | +2.2% | +6.0% | +6.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.3% | +26.5% | -5.4% | +20.0% | +1.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +124.4% | -34.5% | -60.5% | +106.2% | +71.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MTRX and GLDD each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, GLDD trades at a 72% valuation discount to MYRG's 56.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PRIM offers better value at 1.17x vs GLDD's 10.15x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $342M | $1.1B | $5.9B | $6.7B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $139M | $1.6B | $6.6B | $6.6B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.47x | 15.74x | 21.52x | 56.76x | 21.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 143.06x | 15.40x | 18.06x | 44.03x | 18.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 10.15x | 1.17x | 3.40x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.34x | 13.03x | 28.84x | 17.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.44x | 1.28x | 0.77x | 1.82x | 1.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.37x | 2.23x | 3.52x | 10.18x | 3.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3.12x | 11.41x | 17.20x | 28.66x | 15.59x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-11 for MTRX. MTRX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLDD's 0.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLDD scores 8/9 vs MTRX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.8% | +14.8% | +15.2% | +22.1% | +19.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.4% | +5.8% | +5.6% | +8.7% | +11.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.8% | +9.7% | +13.6% | +18.3% | +11.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -20.0% | +11.4% | +16.3% | +19.4% | +12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.89x | 0.76x | 0.16x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$203M | $445M | $735M | -$47M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $225M | $13M | $541M | $150M | $66M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $458M | $1.3B | $104M | $69M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -26.70x | 3.32x | 21.02x | 39.49x | 12.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MYRG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MYRG five years ago would be worth $51,760 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,773 for MTRX. Over the past 12 months, MYRG leads with a +175.2% total return vs MTRX's -0.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRIM at 64.7% vs MTRX's 31.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.9% | +28.2% | -17.2% | +88.5% | -30.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.8% | +72.1% | +62.4% | +175.2% | +85.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.2% | +190.6% | +346.5% | +219.8% | +339.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.3% | +19.7% | +234.4% | +417.6% | +97.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.3% | +276.9% | +402.0% | +1680.8% | +581.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.1% | +42.7% | +64.7% | +47.3% | +63.8% |
Risk & Volatility
GLDD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLDD is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WLDN's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GLDD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs PRIM's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.62x | 0.92x | 1.83x | 1.70x | 1.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.11 | $17.02 | $205.50 | $475.39 | $137.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.88 | $9.85 | $65.23 | $152.10 | $39.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.5% | +99.9% | +52.6% | +89.9% | +54.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.6 | 68.5 | 30.3 | 80.7 | 46.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 277K | 1.9M | 1.1M | 306K | 345K |
Analyst Outlook
GLDD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MTRX as "Buy", GLDD as "Buy", PRIM as "Buy", MYRG as "Hold", WLDN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.4% upside for MTRX (target: $24) vs -15.3% for MYRG (target: $362). PRIM is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | — | $160.63 | $362.00 | $117.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 7 | 22 | 21 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.32 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +1.0% | +0.2% | +1.2% | 0.0% |
GLDD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). MYRG leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
MTRX vs GLDD vs PRIM vs MYRG vs WLDN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MTRX or GLDD or PRIM or MYRG or WLDN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 6% for Matrix Service Company (MTRX). Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (15. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Matrix Service Company (MTRX) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MTRX or GLDD or PRIM or MYRG or WLDN?
On trailing P/E, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) is the cheapest at 15.
7x versus MYR Group Inc. at 56. 8x. On forward P/E, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primoris Services Corporation wins at 0. 98x versus Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation's 9. 93x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MTRX or GLDD or PRIM or MYRG or WLDN?
Over the past 5 years, MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) delivered a total return of +417. 6%, compared to -12. 3% for Matrix Service Company (MTRX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MYRG returned +1681% versus MTRX's -18. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MTRX or GLDD or PRIM or MYRG or WLDN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
92β versus Willdan Group, Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning WLDN is approximately 113% more volatile than GLDD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Matrix Service Company (MTRX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 89% for Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MTRX or GLDD or PRIM or MYRG or WLDN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus 5. 6% for Matrix Service Company (MTRX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to -16. 5% for Matrix Service Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRIM leads at 19. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MTRX or GLDD or PRIM or MYRG or WLDN?
Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
3% net margin versus -3. 8% for Matrix Service Company — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLDD leads at 14. 1% versus -4. 6% for MTRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WLDN leads at 37. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MTRX or GLDD or PRIM or MYRG or WLDN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation's 9. 93x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Corporation (GLDD) trades at 15. 4x forward P/E versus 143. 1x for Matrix Service Company — 127. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MTRX: 97. 4% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MTRX or GLDD or PRIM or MYRG or WLDN?
In this comparison, PRIM (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. MTRX, GLDD, MYRG, WLDN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MTRX or GLDD or PRIM or MYRG or WLDN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1681% 10Y return). Matrix Service Company (MTRX) carries a higher beta of 1. 62 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MYRG: +1681%, MTRX: -18. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MTRX and GLDD and PRIM and MYRG and WLDN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MTRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GLDD is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WLDN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.