MTZ vs DY

For growth investors, MasTec, Inc.

(MTZ) is the stronger pick with 16. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 6% for Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY). Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) offers the better valuation at 53. 8x trailing P/E (30. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Dycom Industries, Inc.

(DY) is the cheapest at 53. 8x versus MasTec, Inc. at 81. 3x. On forward P/E, Dycom Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Dycom Industries, Inc. wins at 0. 88x versus MasTec, Inc. 's 16. 37x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Dycom Industries, Inc.

(DY) delivered a total return of +331. 9%, compared to +270. 5% for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTZ returned +1753% versus DY's +516. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dycom Industries, Inc.

(DY) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 22β versus MasTec, Inc. 's 1. 64β — meaning MTZ is approximately 34% more volatile than DY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 84% versus 85% for Dycom Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MasTec, Inc.

(MTZ) is pulling ahead at 16. 2% versus 12. 6% for Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MasTec, Inc. grew EPS 146. 1% year-over-year, compared to 7. 5% for Dycom Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DY leads at 14. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Dycom Industries, Inc.

(DY) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 0% net margin versus 2. 8% for MasTec, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DY leads at 7. 2% versus 4. 6% for MTZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DY leads at 15. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 88x versus MasTec, Inc. 's 16. 37x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Dycom Industries, Inc. (DY) trades at 30. 3x forward P/E versus 48. 6x for MasTec, Inc. — 18. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DY: 1. 5% to $432. 71.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, MasTec, Inc.

(MTZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1753% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTZ: +1753%, DY: +516. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MTZ is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.