Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MTZ vs PWR vs WLDN vs MYRG vs PRIM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
MTZ vs PWR vs WLDN vs MYRG vs PRIM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $32.50B | $112.65B | $1.10B | $6.65B | $5.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.28B | $29.99B | $684M | $3.82B | $7.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $459M | $1.12B | $56M | $142M | $248M |
| Gross Margin | 12.1% | 13.6% | 38.2% | 11.9% | 10.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 5.8% | 6.5% | 5.1% | 4.9% |
| Forward P/E | 48.6x | 57.4x | 18.1x | 44.0x | 18.1x |
| Total Debt | $2.80B | $1.19B | $69M | $104M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $396M | $440M | $66M | $150M | $541M |
MTZ vs PWR vs WLDN vs MYRG vs PRIM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) | 100 | 1053.1 | +953.1% |
| Quanta Services, In… (PWR) | 100 | 2032.8 | +1932.8% |
| Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) | 100 | 304.6 | +204.6% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 1483.4 | +1383.4% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 647.2 | +547.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MTZ vs PWR vs WLDN vs MYRG vs PRIM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MTZ ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +183.8% vs PRIM's +62.4%
PWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 0.1%
- 31.4% 10Y total return vs MTZ's 17.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 1.14x
- Beta 1.30, yield 0.1%, current ratio 1.14x
WLDN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 120.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.7%
- 20.5% revenue growth vs MYRG's 8.8%
- 8.2% margin vs MTZ's 3.0%
- 11.0% ROA vs MTZ's 4.7%, ROIC 11.5% vs 8.9%
Among these 5 stocks, MYRG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PRIM is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.98 vs MTZ's 16.37
- Lower P/E (18.1x vs 44.0x), PEG 0.98 vs 2.64
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs MYRG's 8.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.1x vs 44.0x), PEG 0.98 vs 2.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.2% margin vs MTZ's 3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs WLDN's 1.96, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs PRIM's 0.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +183.8% vs PRIM's +62.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.0% ROA vs MTZ's 4.7%, ROIC 11.5% vs 8.9% |
MTZ vs PWR vs WLDN vs MYRG vs PRIM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MTZ vs PWR vs WLDN vs MYRG vs PRIM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WLDN leads in 1 of 6 categories
PRIM leads 1 • MYRG leads 1 • MTZ leads 1 • PWR leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WLDN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.0B annually — 43.8x WLDN's $684M. WLDN is the more profitable business, keeping 8.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MTZ's 3.0%. On growth, MTZ holds the edge at +34.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.3B | $30.0B | $684M | $3.8B | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $2.4B | $64M | $261M | $437M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $459M | $1.1B | $56M | $142M | $248M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $179M | $1.7B | $43M | $231M | $165M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +13.6% | +38.2% | +11.9% | +10.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +5.8% | +6.5% | +5.1% | +4.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +3.7% | +8.2% | +3.7% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +5.6% | +6.3% | +6.0% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +34.5% | +26.3% | +1.8% | +20.0% | -5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.9% | +51.0% | +71.9% | +106.2% | -60.5% |
Valuation Metrics
PRIM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.3x trailing earnings, WLDN trades at a 81% valuation discount to PWR's 110.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PRIM offers better value at 1.17x vs MTZ's 27.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32.5B | $112.7B | $1.1B | $6.7B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34.9B | $113.4B | $1.1B | $6.6B | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 81.32x | 110.40x | 21.34x | 56.76x | 21.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 48.62x | 57.40x | 18.06x | 44.03x | 18.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 27.39x | 6.40x | — | 3.40x | 1.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 32.32x | 45.68x | 17.59x | 28.84x | 13.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.27x | 3.97x | 1.62x | 1.82x | 0.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.73x | 12.61x | 3.68x | 10.18x | 3.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 113.74x | 69.50x | 15.59x | 28.66x | 17.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $13 for PWR. PWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MTZ's 0.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MTZ scores 8/9 vs PWR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.2% | +13.0% | +19.4% | +22.1% | +15.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.7% | +4.8% | +11.0% | +8.7% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.9% | +11.8% | +11.5% | +18.3% | +13.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.2% | +11.3% | +12.4% | +19.4% | +16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.84x | 0.13x | 0.23x | 0.16x | 0.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | $748M | $3M | -$47M | $735M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $396M | $440M | $66M | $150M | $541M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.8B | $1.2B | $69M | $104M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.37x | 6.27x | 12.45x | 39.49x | 21.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTZ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PWR five years ago would be worth $75,108 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,696 for WLDN. Over the past 12 months, MTZ leads with a +183.8% total return vs PRIM's +62.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTZ at 67.3% vs MYRG's 47.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +81.1% | +70.8% | -30.2% | +88.5% | -17.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +183.8% | +132.1% | +85.8% | +175.2% | +62.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +368.2% | +345.2% | +339.1% | +219.8% | +346.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +270.5% | +651.1% | +97.0% | +417.6% | +234.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1752.9% | +3143.9% | +581.3% | +1680.8% | +402.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +67.3% | +64.5% | +63.8% | +47.3% | +64.7% |
Risk & Volatility
PWR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PWR is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WLDN's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PWR currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs PRIM's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 1.30x | 1.96x | 1.70x | 1.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $441.43 | $788.72 | $137.00 | $475.39 | $205.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $143.93 | $315.45 | $39.57 | $152.10 | $65.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.4% | +95.2% | +54.4% | +89.9% | +52.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.5 | 87.0 | 46.8 | 80.7 | 30.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 942K | 1.1M | 345K | 306K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PWR and PRIM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MTZ as "Buy", PWR as "Buy", WLDN as "Buy", MYRG as "Hold", PRIM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.8% upside for WLDN (target: $118) vs -19.9% for MTZ (target: $330). PRIM is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $330.25 | $647.23 | $117.50 | $362.00 | $160.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 35 | 7 | 21 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.40 | — | — | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +1.2% | +0.2% |
WLDN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PRIM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MTZ vs PWR vs WLDN vs MYRG vs PRIM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MTZ or PWR or WLDN or MYRG or PRIM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 8% for MYR Group Inc. (MYRG). Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) offers the better valuation at 21. 3x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MTZ or PWR or WLDN or MYRG or PRIM?
On trailing P/E, Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the cheapest at 21. 3x versus Quanta Services, Inc. at 110. 4x. On forward P/E, Primoris Services Corporation is actually cheaper at 18. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primoris Services Corporation wins at 0. 98x versus MasTec, Inc. 's 16. 37x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MTZ or PWR or WLDN or MYRG or PRIM?
Over the past 5 years, Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) delivered a total return of +651. 1%, compared to +97. 0% for Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PWR returned +31. 4% versus PRIM's +402. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MTZ or PWR or WLDN or MYRG or PRIM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Willdan Group, Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning WLDN is approximately 50% more volatile than PWR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 84% for MasTec, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MTZ or PWR or WLDN or MYRG or PRIM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus 8. 8% for MYR Group Inc. (MYRG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to 12. 8% for Quanta Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PRIM leads at 19. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MTZ or PWR or WLDN or MYRG or PRIM?
Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 7% net margin versus 2. 8% for MasTec, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WLDN leads at 6. 5% versus 4. 4% for MYRG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WLDN leads at 37. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MTZ or PWR or WLDN or MYRG or PRIM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus MasTec, Inc. 's 16. 37x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) trades at 18. 1x forward P/E versus 57. 4x for Quanta Services, Inc. — 39. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WLDN: 57. 8% to $117. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MTZ or PWR or WLDN or MYRG or PRIM?
In this comparison, PRIM (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. MTZ, PWR, WLDN, MYRG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MTZ or PWR or WLDN or MYRG or PRIM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MasTec, Inc.
(MTZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1753% 10Y return). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTZ: +1753%, PRIM: +402. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MTZ and PWR and WLDN and MYRG and PRIM?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MTZ is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WLDN is a small-cap high-growth stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.