Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MUX vs HL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.

Other Precious Metals

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$1.39B
5Y Perf.+158.6%
HL
Hecla Mining Company

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.13B
5Y Perf.+444.8%

MUX vs HL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MUX logoMUX
HL logoHL
IndustryOther Precious MetalsGold
Market Cap$1.39B$12.13B
Revenue (TTM)$162M$1.57B
Net Income (TTM)$74M$559M
Gross Margin32.9%50.9%
Operating Margin22.2%44.1%
Forward P/E22.2x19.1x
Total Debt$926K$299M
Cash & Equiv.$51M$242M

MUX vs HLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MUX
HL
StockMay 20May 26Return
McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX)100258.6+158.6%
Hecla Mining Company (HL)100544.8+444.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MUX vs HL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HL leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. McEwen Mining Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MUX
McEwen Mining Inc.
The Income Pick

MUX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 0.2%
  • 45.7% margin vs HL's 35.6%
  • 0.2% yield, vs HL's 0.1%
Best for: income & stability
HL
Hecla Mining Company
The Growth Play

HL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 7.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.6%
  • 360.6% 10Y total return vs MUX's -0.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 11.5%, current ratio 2.72x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHL logoHL53.0% revenue growth vs MUX's 13.2%
ValueHL logoHLLower P/E (19.1x vs 22.2x)
Quality / MarginsMUX logoMUX45.7% margin vs HL's 35.6%
Stability / SafetyHL logoHLBeta 1.26 vs MUX's 1.27
DividendsMUX logoMUX0.2% yield, vs HL's 0.1%
Momentum (1Y)HL logoHL+271.0% vs MUX's +198.5%
Efficiency (ROA)HL logoHL16.3% ROA vs MUX's 9.0%, ROIC 15.3% vs -1.9%

MUX vs HL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MUXMcEwen Mining Inc.
FY 2025
United States Reportable Segment
59.1%$117M
Canada Reportable Segment
38.5%$76M
Mexico Reportable Segment
2.4%$5M
HLHecla Mining Company
FY 2024
Silver Contracts
43.5%$414M
Gold
33.5%$318M
Zinc
13.8%$131M
Lead
9.2%$87M
Copper
0.0%$416,000

MUX vs HL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHLLAGGINGMUX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

HL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 9.7x MUX's $162M. MUX is the more profitable business, keeping 45.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HL's 35.6%. On growth, HL holds the edge at +57.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$162M$1.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$61M$853M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$74M$559M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$24M$472M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+32.9%+50.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.2%+44.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+45.7%+35.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-14.7%+30.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+57.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+4.9%-160.0%
HL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 36.9x trailing earnings, HL trades at a 7% valuation discount to MUX's 39.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HL's 17.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MUX's 74.7x.

MetricMUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
Market CapShares × price$1.4B$12.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.3B$12.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS39.61x36.92x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.21x19.07x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple74.65x17.25x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.03x8.53x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.31x4.58x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF39.11x
HL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $14 for MUX. MUX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HL's 0.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs MUX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricMUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+13.6%+22.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+9.0%+16.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.9%+15.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-1.9%+16.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–958
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.12x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$50M$57M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$51M$242M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$926,000$299M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.52x19.04x
HL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,033 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,977 for MUX. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +271.0% total return vs MUX's +198.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HL at 43.4% vs MUX's 38.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+25.1%-4.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+198.5%+271.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+163.5%+194.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+79.8%+150.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-0.1%+360.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+38.1%+43.4%
HL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MUX and HL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HL is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MUX's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MUX currently trades 78.7% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.27x1.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$29.70$34.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.88$4.68
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.7%+52.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10051.046.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded992K15.4M
Evenly matched — MUX and HL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MUX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates MUX as "Buy" and HL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.7% upside for HL (target: $24) vs 28.4% for MUX (target: $30). MUX is the only dividend payer here at 0.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricMUX logoMUXMcEwen Mining Inc.HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$30.00$23.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts726
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.2%+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.04$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.0%
MUX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

HL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MUX leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallHecla Mining Company (HL)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MUX vs HL: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MUX or HL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger pick with 53.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 2% for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX). Hecla Mining Company (HL) offers the better valuation at 36. 9x trailing P/E (19. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — MUX or HL?

On trailing P/E, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the cheapest at 36.

9x versus McEwen Mining Inc. at 39. 6x. On forward P/E, Hecla Mining Company is actually cheaper at 19. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — MUX or HL?

Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.

3%, compared to +79. 8% for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus MUX's -0. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — MUX or HL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

26β versus McEwen Mining Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning MUX is approximately 1% more volatile than HL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 12% for Hecla Mining Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — MUX or HL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is pulling ahead at 53.

0% versus 13. 2% for McEwen Mining Inc. (MUX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to 168. 6% for McEwen Mining Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HL leads at 25. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — MUX or HL?

Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the more profitable company, earning 22.

6% net margin versus 17. 4% for McEwen Mining Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus -6. 5% for MUX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HL leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is MUX or HL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Hecla Mining Company (HL) trades at 19.

1x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for McEwen Mining Inc. — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HL: 31. 7% to $23. 83.

08

Which pays a better dividend — MUX or HL?

In this comparison, MUX (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. HL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is MUX or HL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

26), +360. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HL: +360. 6%, MUX: -0. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between MUX and HL?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

MUX

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform MUX and HL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(MUX: -100.0% · HL: 57.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(MUX: 45.7% · HL: 35.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(MUX: 39.6x · HL: 36.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.