Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MYE vs SLGN vs SEE vs SON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
Packaging & Containers
MYE vs SLGN vs SEE vs SON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $837M | $4.25B | $6.21B | $5.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $784M | $6.58B | $5.36B | $7.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $42M | $283M | $506M | $1.04B |
| Gross Margin | 31.7% | 17.4% | 29.8% | 20.9% |
| Operating Margin | 11.9% | 9.8% | 13.5% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | 18.3x | 10.6x | 12.4x | 8.8x |
| Total Debt | $379M | $4.62B | $4.10B | $4.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $45M | $1.08B | $344M | $378M |
MYE vs SLGN vs SEE vs SON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myers Industries, I… (MYE) | 100 | 164.4 | +64.4% |
| Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) | 100 | 120.4 | +20.4% |
| Sealed Air Corporat… (SEE) | 100 | 131.0 | +31.0% |
| Sonoco Products Com… (SON) | 100 | 99.8 | -0.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MYE vs SLGN vs SEE vs SON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MYE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 95.4% 10Y total return vs SLGN's 80.8%
- +97.8% vs SLGN's -23.7%
SLGN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SEE is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.32 vs MYE's 1.33
SON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 4.0%
- Rev growth 41.7%, EPS growth 141.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, current ratio 1.05x
- PEG 0.62 vs SEE's 9.73
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 41.7% revenue growth vs MYE's -1.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 12.4x), PEG 0.62 vs 9.73 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.8% margin vs SLGN's 4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs MYE's 1.33 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 30-year raise streak, vs SLGN's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +97.8% vs SLGN's -23.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs SLGN's 3.0%, ROIC 6.2% vs 8.7% |
MYE vs SLGN vs SEE vs SON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MYE vs SLGN vs SEE vs SON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SON leads in 2 of 6 categories
MYE leads 1 • SEE leads 1 • SLGN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MYE and SEE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SON is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 9.6x MYE's $784M. SON is the more profitable business, keeping 13.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLGN's 4.3%. On growth, SLGN holds the edge at +6.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $784M | $6.6B | $5.4B | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $132M | $966M | $965M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $42M | $283M | $506M | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $89M | $307M | $459M | $266M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.7% | +17.4% | +29.8% | +20.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +9.8% | +13.5% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +4.3% | +9.4% | +13.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.4% | +4.7% | +8.6% | +3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.4% | +6.5% | +2.1% | -1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -127.8% | -6.3% | +16.4% | +23.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SON leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, SEE trades at a 49% valuation discount to MYE's 24.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SON offers better value at 0.92x vs SEE's 9.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $837M | $4.3B | $6.2B | $5.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $7.8B | $10.0B | $9.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.06x | 14.91x | 12.29x | 12.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.34x | 10.60x | 12.38x | 8.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 9.66x | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.38x | 7.97x | 14.33x | 7.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.01x | 0.66x | 1.16x | 0.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.86x | 1.89x | 5.02x | 1.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.46x | 10.07x | 13.54x | 12.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MYE and SEE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SEE delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $12 for SLGN. MYE carries lower financial leverage with a 1.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SEE's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLGN scores 8/9 vs SEE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.5% | +12.5% | +48.4% | +30.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | +3.0% | +7.1% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.9% | +8.7% | +11.2% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.2% | +9.9% | +14.1% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.29x | 2.03x | 3.31x | 1.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $334M | $3.5B | $3.8B | $4.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $45M | $1.1B | $344M | $378M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $379M | $4.6B | $4.1B | $4.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.39x | 3.36x | 1.95x | 4.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MYE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MYE five years ago would be worth $11,505 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,088 for SEE. Over the past 12 months, MYE leads with a +97.8% total return vs SLGN's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MYE at 8.1% vs SLGN's -3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.0% | -1.9% | +2.0% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +97.8% | -23.7% | +44.2% | +21.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.2% | -11.1% | +2.4% | -3.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.0% | +1.4% | -19.1% | -9.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.4% | +80.8% | +4.4% | +48.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.1% | -3.8% | +0.8% | -1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
SEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MYE's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SEE currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs SLGN's 70.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 0.66x | 0.32x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.25 | $57.04 | $44.27 | $58.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.39 | $36.15 | $28.15 | $38.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.3% | +70.6% | +95.2% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 51.1 | 64.0 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 214K | 769K | 3.0M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
SON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MYE as "Buy", SLGN as "Buy", SEE as "Buy", SON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for SLGN (target: $51) vs 3.2% for SEE (target: $44). For income investors, SON offers the higher dividend yield at 4.04% vs SEE's 1.92%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.00 | $50.50 | $43.50 | $59.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 21 | 27 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +2.0% | +1.9% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 21 | 0 | 30 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.55 | $0.80 | $0.81 | $2.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +1.6% | 0.0% | +0.2% |
SON leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). MYE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
MYE vs SLGN vs SEE vs SON: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MYE or SLGN or SEE or SON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the stronger pick with 41.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for Myers Industries, Inc. (MYE). Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Myers Industries, Inc. (MYE) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MYE or SLGN or SEE or SON?
On trailing P/E, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus Myers Industries, Inc. at 24. 1x. On forward P/E, Sonoco Products Company is actually cheaper at 8. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sonoco Products Company wins at 0. 62x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MYE or SLGN or SEE or SON?
Over the past 5 years, Myers Industries, Inc.
(MYE) delivered a total return of +15. 0%, compared to -19. 1% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MYE returned +95. 4% versus SEE's +4. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MYE or SLGN or SEE or SON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
32β versus Myers Industries, Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning MYE is approximately 310% more volatile than SEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Myers Industries, Inc. (MYE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 129% versus 3% for Sealed Air Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MYE or SLGN or SEE or SON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sonoco Products Company (SON) is pulling ahead at 41.
7% versus -1. 3% for Myers Industries, Inc. (MYE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Myers Industries, Inc. grew EPS 389. 5% year-over-year, compared to 4. 7% for Silgan Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SON leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MYE or SLGN or SEE or SON?
Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
4% net margin versus 4. 2% for Myers Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SEE leads at 13. 5% versus 9. 5% for SON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MYE leads at 31. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MYE or SLGN or SEE or SON more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Sealed Air Corporation's 9. 73x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sonoco Products Company (SON) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 18. 3x for Myers Industries, Inc. — 9. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLGN: 25. 4% to $50. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MYE or SLGN or SEE or SON?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Sonoco Products Company (SON) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 9% for Sealed Air Corporation (SEE).
09Is MYE or SLGN or SEE or SON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sealed Air Corporation (SEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
32), 1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SEE: +4. 4%, MYE: +95. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MYE and SLGN and SEE and SON?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MYE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SLGN is a small-cap deep-value stock; SEE is a small-cap deep-value stock; SON is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.