Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MYFW vs BLK vs TROW vs ICE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
MYFW vs BLK vs TROW vs ICE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Asset Management | Asset Management | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $297M | $170.69B | $23.86B | $79.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $186M | $24.22B | $7.41B | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $5.55B | $2.09B | $3.30B |
| Gross Margin | 52.5% | 50.5% | 69.1% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 29.1% | 30.2% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | 12.9x | 19.4x | 11.6x | 17.3x |
| Total Debt | $108M | $15.00B | $860M | $20.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $11.47B | $3.38B | $837M |
MYFW vs BLK vs TROW vs ICE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Western Finan… (MYFW) | 100 | 214.2 | +114.2% |
| BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) | 100 | 189.7 | +89.7% |
| T. Rowe Price Group… (TROW) | 100 | 88.8 | -11.2% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 153.4 | +53.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MYFW vs BLK vs TROW vs ICE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MYFW is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +46.7% vs ICE's -20.4%
BLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 246.8% 10Y total return vs ICE's 195.3%
- 18.7% NII/revenue growth vs TROW's 3.1%
TROW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 38 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 4.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 7.1%, current ratio 73.08x
- Beta 1.04, yield 4.7%, current ratio 73.08x
- NIM 3.4% vs MYFW's 2.4%
ICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 20.7%
- PEG 1.95 vs BLK's 9.03
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs MYFW's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.35 vs BLK's 1.29
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.7% NII/revenue growth vs TROW's 3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.6x vs 19.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs MYFW's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs BLK's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, 38-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.7% vs ICE's -20.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs MYFW's 0.4% |
MYFW vs BLK vs TROW vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MYFW vs BLK vs TROW vs ICE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TROW leads in 3 of 6 categories
ICE leads 1 • MYFW leads 1 • BLK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLK is the larger business by revenue, generating $24.2B annually — 130.0x MYFW's $186M. TROW is the more profitable business, keeping 28.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MYFW's 7.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $186M | $24.2B | $7.4B | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20M | $8.1B | $2.7B | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $5.6B | $2.1B | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $3.6B | $2.3B | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.5% | +50.5% | +69.1% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +29.1% | +30.2% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +22.9% | +28.3% | +26.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +14.8% | +31.6% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.9% | -22.7% | +3.7% | +23.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TROW leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, TROW trades at a 59% valuation discount to BLK's 29.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ICE offers better value at 2.74x vs BLK's 13.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $297M | $170.7B | $23.9B | $79.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $395M | $174.2B | $21.3B | $99.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.78x | 29.14x | 11.85x | 24.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.88x | 19.40x | 11.59x | 17.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 13.57x | — | 2.74x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.70x | 22.60x | 8.14x | 15.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.59x | 7.05x | 3.26x | 6.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 2.77x | 2.04x | 2.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 45.53x | 16.13x | 18.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TROW leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TROW delivers a 17.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $5 for MYFW. TROW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs TROW's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +9.9% | +17.6% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +3.6% | +14.4% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +7.5% | +13.3% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +4.6% | +15.9% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.24x | 0.07x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $98M | $3.5B | -$2.5B | $19.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $11.5B | $3.4B | $837M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $108M | $15.0B | $860M | $20.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.21x | 10.70x | — | 6.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MYFW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ICE five years ago would be worth $13,085 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,107 for TROW. Over the past 12 months, MYFW leads with a +46.7% total return vs ICE's -20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MYFW at 18.6% vs TROW's 4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.6% | -3.8% | +6.0% | -11.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | +6.6% | +21.3% | -20.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.8% | +60.4% | +12.6% | +34.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.6% | +29.2% | -28.9% | +30.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.0% | +246.8% | +111.0% | +195.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.6% | +17.1% | +4.0% | +10.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MYFW and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLK's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MYFW currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 1.29x | 1.04x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.08 | $1219.94 | $118.22 | $189.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.29 | $917.39 | $85.51 | $136.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +84.6% | +92.7% | +74.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.3 | 44.9 | 68.7 | 31.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 33K | 602K | 1.9M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
TROW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MYFW as "Buy", BLK as "Buy", TROW as "Hold", ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.0% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs -11.6% for MYFW (target: $27). For income investors, TROW offers the higher dividend yield at 4.66% vs MYFW's 0.19%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $1301.63 | $102.60 | $194.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 33 | 38 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +2.0% | +4.7% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 16 | 38 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | $20.24 | $5.11 | $1.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +1.1% | +2.6% | +1.7% |
TROW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ICE leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
MYFW vs BLK vs TROW vs ICE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MYFW or BLK or TROW or ICE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 1% for T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW). T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Western Financial, Inc. (MYFW) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MYFW or BLK or TROW or ICE?
On trailing P/E, T.
Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) is the cheapest at 11. 9x versus BlackRock, Inc. at 29. 1x. On forward P/E, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. wins at 1. 95x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 9. 03x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MYFW or BLK or TROW or ICE?
Over the past 5 years, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) delivered a total return of +30. 9%, compared to -28. 9% for T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLK returned +246. 8% versus MYFW's +55. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MYFW or BLK or TROW or ICE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning BLK is approximately 268% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 70% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MYFW or BLK or TROW or ICE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus 3. 1% for T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Western Financial, Inc. grew EPS 54. 0% year-over-year, compared to -15. 7% for BlackRock, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MYFW or BLK or TROW or ICE?
T.
Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 5% net margin versus 7. 1% for First Western Financial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 9. 7% for MYFW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TROW leads at 62. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MYFW or BLK or TROW or ICE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 95x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 9. 03x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 19. 4x for BlackRock, Inc. — 7. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 38. 0% to $194. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MYFW or BLK or TROW or ICE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) offers the highest yield at 4. 7%, versus 0. 2% for First Western Financial, Inc. (MYFW).
09Is MYFW or BLK or TROW or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 1. 4% yield, +195. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +195. 3%, MYFW: +55. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MYFW and BLK and TROW and ICE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MYFW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TROW is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. BLK, TROW, ICE pay a dividend while MYFW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.