Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MYFW vs BLK vs TROW vs ICE vs JPM vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
MYFW vs BLK vs TROW vs ICE vs JPM vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Asset Management | Asset Management | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $297M | $170.69B | $23.86B | $79.60B | $896.00B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $186M | $24.22B | $7.41B | $12.64B | $280.33B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $5.55B | $2.09B | $3.30B | $57.05B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 52.5% | 50.5% | 69.1% | 61.9% | 60.0% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 29.1% | 30.2% | 38.7% | 25.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.9x | 19.4x | 11.6x | 17.3x | 14.4x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $108M | $15.00B | $860M | $20.28B | $942.38B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $11.47B | $3.38B | $837M | $343.34B | $10.27B |
MYFW vs BLK vs TROW vs ICE vs JPM vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Western Finan… (MYFW) | 100 | 214.2 | +114.2% |
| BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) | 100 | 189.7 | +89.7% |
| T. Rowe Price Group… (TROW) | 100 | 88.8 | -11.2% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 153.4 | +53.4% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MYFW vs BLK vs TROW vs ICE vs JPM vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MYFW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.8%, EPS growth 54.0%
- +46.7% vs ICE's -20.4%
BLK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 18.7% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
TROW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 38 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 4.7%
- Beta 1.04, yield 4.7%, current ratio 73.08x
- NIM 3.4% vs JPM's 2.2%
- 28.3% margin vs MYFW's 7.1%
ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 69.9%, current ratio 1.02x
- Beta 0.35 vs BLK's 1.29
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs BLK's 246.8%
- PEG 0.81 vs BLK's 9.03
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
KO doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.7% NII/revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.3% margin vs MYFW's 7.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs BLK's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, 38-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.7% vs ICE's -20.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.4% ROA vs MYFW's 0.4%, ROIC 13.3% vs 3.7% |
MYFW vs BLK vs TROW vs ICE vs JPM vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MYFW vs BLK vs TROW vs ICE vs JPM vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TROW leads in 1 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • KO leads 1 • MYFW leads 0 • BLK leads 0 • ICE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TROW and ICE each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 1504.4x MYFW's $186M. TROW is the more profitable business, keeping 28.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MYFW's 7.1%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $186M | $24.2B | $7.4B | $12.6B | $280.3B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20M | $8.1B | $2.7B | $6.5B | $81.4B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $5.6B | $2.1B | $3.3B | $57.0B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $3.6B | $2.3B | $4.3B | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.5% | +50.5% | +69.1% | +61.9% | +60.0% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +29.1% | +30.2% | +38.7% | +25.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +22.9% | +28.3% | +26.1% | +20.4% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +14.8% | +31.6% | +33.9% | +36.0% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.9% | -22.7% | +3.7% | +23.1% | +16.0% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TROW leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.9x trailing earnings, TROW trades at a 59% valuation discount to BLK's 29.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs BLK's 13.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $297M | $170.7B | $23.9B | $79.6B | $896.0B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $395M | $174.2B | $21.3B | $99.0B | $1.50T | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.78x | 29.14x | 11.85x | 24.36x | 16.00x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.88x | 19.40x | 11.59x | 17.34x | 14.40x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 13.57x | — | 2.74x | 0.90x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.70x | 22.60x | 8.14x | 15.34x | 18.36x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.59x | 7.05x | 3.26x | 6.30x | 3.20x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 2.77x | 2.04x | 2.77x | 2.47x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 45.53x | 16.13x | 18.56x | 8.88x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — TROW and KO each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $5 for MYFW. TROW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs TROW's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +9.9% | +17.6% | +11.6% | +15.9% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +3.6% | +14.4% | +2.3% | +1.3% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +7.5% | +13.3% | +7.5% | +4.5% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +4.6% | +15.9% | +9.5% | +8.9% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.24x | 0.07x | 0.70x | 2.60x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $98M | $3.5B | -$2.5B | $19.4B | $599.0B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $11.5B | $3.4B | $837M | $343.3B | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $108M | $15.0B | $860M | $20.3B | $942.4B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.21x | 10.70x | — | 6.53x | 0.74x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,107 for TROW. Over the past 12 months, MYFW leads with a +46.7% total return vs ICE's -20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs TROW's 4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.6% | -3.8% | +6.0% | -11.8% | -0.5% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | +6.6% | +21.3% | -20.4% | +21.8% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.8% | +60.4% | +12.6% | +34.6% | +138.2% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.6% | +29.2% | -28.9% | +30.9% | +118.2% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.0% | +246.8% | +111.0% | +195.3% | +465.8% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.6% | +17.1% | +4.0% | +10.4% | +33.6% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLK's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 1.29x | 1.04x | 0.35x | 0.94x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.08 | $1219.94 | $118.22 | $189.35 | $337.25 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.29 | $917.39 | $85.51 | $136.67 | $262.71 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +84.6% | +92.7% | +74.2% | +95.1% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.3 | 44.9 | 68.7 | 31.9 | 59.1 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 33K | 602K | 1.9M | 3.2M | 7.0M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TROW and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MYFW as "Buy", BLK as "Buy", TROW as "Hold", ICE as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.0% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs -11.6% for MYFW (target: $27). For income investors, TROW offers the higher dividend yield at 4.66% vs MYFW's 0.19%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $1301.63 | $102.60 | $194.00 | $339.75 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 33 | 38 | 36 | 61 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +2.0% | +4.7% | +1.4% | +1.9% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 16 | 38 | 13 | 15 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | $20.24 | $5.11 | $1.93 | $5.95 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +1.1% | +2.6% | +1.7% | +3.9% | +0.2% |
TROW leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
MYFW vs BLK vs TROW vs ICE vs JPM vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MYFW or BLK or TROW or ICE or JPM or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is the stronger pick with 18. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) offers the better valuation at 11. 9x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Western Financial, Inc. (MYFW) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MYFW or BLK or TROW or ICE or JPM or KO?
On trailing P/E, T.
Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) is the cheapest at 11. 9x versus BlackRock, Inc. at 29. 1x. On forward P/E, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 9. 03x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MYFW or BLK or TROW or ICE or JPM or KO?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -28. 9% for T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus MYFW's +55. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MYFW or BLK or TROW or ICE or JPM or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning BLK is approximately -746% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MYFW or BLK or TROW or ICE or JPM or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BlackRock, Inc.
(BLK) is pulling ahead at 18. 7% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Western Financial, Inc. grew EPS 54. 0% year-over-year, compared to -15. 7% for BlackRock, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MYFW or BLK or TROW or ICE or JPM or KO?
T.
Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 5% net margin versus 7. 1% for First Western Financial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 9. 7% for MYFW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TROW leads at 62. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MYFW or BLK or TROW or ICE or JPM or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 9. 03x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) trades at 11. 6x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 13. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 38. 0% to $194. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MYFW or BLK or TROW or ICE or JPM or KO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (TROW) offers the highest yield at 4. 7%, versus 0. 2% for First Western Financial, Inc. (MYFW).
09Is MYFW or BLK or TROW or ICE or JPM or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, MYFW: +55. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MYFW and BLK and TROW and ICE and JPM and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (MYFW (Financial Services) and BLK (Financial Services) and TROW (Financial Services) and ICE (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MYFW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TROW is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. BLK, TROW, ICE, JPM, KO pay a dividend while MYFW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.