Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MYFW vs BOKF vs CVBF vs HOMB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
MYFW vs BOKF vs CVBF vs HOMB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $297M | $8.18B | $2.88B | $5.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $186M | $3.33B | $644M | $1.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $13M | $578M | $209M | $475M |
| Gross Margin | 52.5% | 63.7% | 79.7% | 77.3% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 21.4% | 43.7% | 43.8% |
| Forward P/E | 12.9x | 13.1x | 14.7x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $108M | $4.63B | $991M | $935M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $1.66B | $108M | $667M |
MYFW vs BOKF vs CVBF vs HOMB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Western Finan… (MYFW) | 100 | 214.2 | +114.2% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 238.5 | +138.5% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 183.7 | +83.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MYFW vs BOKF vs CVBF vs HOMB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MYFW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 4.8%, EPS growth 54.0%
- 4.8% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's -5.3%
- +46.7% vs HOMB's +3.0%
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 159.2% 10Y total return vs CVBF's 66.9%
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.8% yield, vs BOKF's 1.8%
HOMB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 21.8%, current ratio 0.13x
- PEG 0.87 vs CVBF's 4.64
- Beta 0.66, yield 2.8%, current ratio 0.13x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.8% NII/revenue growth vs HOMB's -5.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 14.7x), PEG 0.87 vs 4.64 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MYFW's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs BOKF's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, vs BOKF's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.7% vs HOMB's +3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs MYFW's 0.4% |
MYFW vs BOKF vs CVBF vs HOMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MYFW vs BOKF vs CVBF vs HOMB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOMB leads in 3 of 6 categories
MYFW leads 1 • BOKF leads 0 • CVBF leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 17.8x MYFW's $186M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 34.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MYFW's 7.1%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $186M | $3.3B | $644M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20M | $794M | $294M | $618M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $13M | $578M | $209M | $475M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $1.7B | $217M | $311M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.5% | +63.7% | +79.7% | +77.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +21.4% | +43.7% | +43.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.1% | +17.4% | +32.5% | +34.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +51.4% | +33.7% | +22.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.9% | +1.8% | +11.1% | +26.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HOMB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 49% valuation discount to MYFW's 22.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOMB offers better value at 0.89x vs CVBF's 4.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $297M | $8.2B | $2.9B | $5.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $395M | $11.2B | $3.8B | $5.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.78x | 14.66x | 13.97x | 11.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.88x | 13.09x | 14.74x | 11.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.79x | 4.40x | 0.89x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.70x | 14.05x | 13.37x | 9.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.59x | 2.46x | 4.48x | 4.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 1.39x | 1.26x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.22x | 13.26x | 11.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB delivers a 11.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $5 for MYFW. HOMB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BOKF scores 7/9 vs MYFW's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.1% | +9.8% | +9.3% | +11.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +1.1% | +1.4% | +2.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +5.2% | +6.8% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.1% | +8.4% | +9.3% | +11.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.41x | 0.78x | 0.43x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $98M | $3.0B | $883M | $268M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $1.7B | $108M | $667M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $108M | $4.6B | $991M | $935M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.21x | 0.59x | 2.12x | 1.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MYFW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOKF five years ago would be worth $16,653 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,465 for MYFW. Over the past 12 months, MYFW leads with a +46.7% total return vs HOMB's +3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MYFW at 18.6% vs HOMB's 9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.6% | +14.5% | +14.8% | +2.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +46.7% | +42.7% | +16.3% | +3.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.8% | +60.8% | +64.4% | +31.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +14.6% | +66.5% | +15.2% | +22.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.0% | +159.2% | +66.9% | +57.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.6% | +17.2% | +18.0% | +9.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CVBF and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HOMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOKF's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVBF currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.75x | 0.87x | 0.81x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.08 | $139.73 | $21.48 | $30.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.29 | $91.35 | $17.95 | $25.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +96.3% | +98.8% | +91.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.3 | 56.4 | 60.1 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 33K | 262K | 1.6M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BOKF and CVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MYFW as "Buy", BOKF as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.6% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs -11.6% for MYFW (target: $27). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs MYFW's 0.19%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $132.00 | $24.75 | $31.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 21 | 16 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +1.8% | +3.8% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 21 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.06 | $2.42 | $0.82 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +5.1% | +2.8% | +1.5% |
HOMB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MYFW leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
MYFW vs BOKF vs CVBF vs HOMB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MYFW or BOKF or CVBF or HOMB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Western Financial, Inc.
(MYFW) is the stronger pick with 4. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 3% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Western Financial, Inc. (MYFW) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MYFW or BOKF or CVBF or HOMB?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus First Western Financial, Inc. at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Home Bancshares, Inc. wins at 0. 87x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MYFW or BOKF or CVBF or HOMB?
Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +66.
5%, compared to +14. 6% for First Western Financial, Inc. (MYFW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOKF returned +159. 2% versus MYFW's +55. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MYFW or BOKF or CVBF or HOMB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 0. 87β — meaning BOKF is approximately 32% more volatile than HOMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 78% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MYFW or BOKF or CVBF or HOMB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Western Financial, Inc.
(MYFW) is pulling ahead at 4. 8% versus -5. 3% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Western Financial, Inc. grew EPS 54. 0% year-over-year, compared to 5. 6% for CVB Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MYFW or BOKF or CVBF or HOMB?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 34. 6% net margin versus 7. 1% for First Western Financial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 34. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 9. 7% for MYFW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MYFW or BOKF or CVBF or HOMB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 87x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 7x for CVB Financial Corp. — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 16. 6% to $24. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — MYFW or BOKF or CVBF or HOMB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 0. 2% for First Western Financial, Inc. (MYFW).
09Is MYFW or BOKF or CVBF or HOMB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HOMB: +57. 7%, MYFW: +55. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MYFW and BOKF and CVBF and HOMB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MYFW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BOKF is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock. BOKF, CVBF, HOMB pay a dividend while MYFW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.