Industrial Materials
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NAK vs FCX vs SCCO vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Copper
Copper
Banks - Diversified
NAK vs FCX vs SCCO vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Copper | Copper | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $1.14B | $98.32B | $156.78B | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $26.42B | $13.42B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-40M | $2.73B | $4.33B | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | — | 27.8% | 56.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 27.8% | 52.2% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 25.7x | 26.2x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $11.50B | $7.41B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $55M | $3.35B | $4.30B | $343.34B |
NAK vs FCX vs SCCO vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Dynasty Mi… (NAK) | 100 | 142.7 | +42.7% |
| Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX) | 100 | 591.3 | +491.3% |
| Southern Copper Cor… (SCCO) | 100 | 501.3 | +401.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NAK vs FCX vs SCCO vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NAK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 43.8% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
FCX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.19, Low D/E 37.4%, current ratio 2.29x
SCCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 17.4%, EPS growth 24.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
- 7.6% 10Y total return vs NAK's 5.1%
- 32.3% margin vs NAK's -0.3%
- +104.8% vs JPM's +21.8%
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.9%
- PEG 0.81 vs SCCO's 1.25
- Beta 0.94, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 26.2x), PEG 0.81 vs 1.25
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.8% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 26.2x), PEG 0.81 vs 1.25 | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.3% margin vs NAK's -0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs NAK's 2.42 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs SCCO's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +104.8% vs JPM's +21.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.4% ROA vs NAK's -32.3%, ROIC 38.6% vs -68.7% |
NAK vs FCX vs SCCO vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NAK vs FCX vs SCCO vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories
SCCO leads 2 • NAK leads 1 • FCX leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SCCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and NAK operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. SCCO is the more profitable business, keeping 32.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FCX's 10.3%. On growth, SCCO holds the edge at +39.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $26.4B | $13.4B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$22M | $9.6B | $7.9B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$40M | $2.7B | $4.3B | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23M | $6.2B | $3.4B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +27.8% | +56.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +27.8% | +52.2% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +10.3% | +32.3% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +23.6% | +25.5% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +12.2% | +39.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +146.8% | +154.2% | +54.5% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 64% valuation discount to FCX's 45.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs SCCO's 1.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.1B | $98.3B | $156.8B | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $106.5B | $159.9B | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -15.01x | 45.01x | 36.22x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.71x | 26.16x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.50x | 1.73x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 12.48x | 20.32x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.82x | 11.68x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 88.49x | 3.21x | 14.33x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 88.10x | 45.75x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SCCO delivers a 42.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-99 for NAK. NAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCCO scores 8/9 vs NAK's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -98.8% | +8.9% | +42.0% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.3% | +4.7% | +21.4% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -68.7% | +12.8% | +38.6% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -40.1% | +12.4% | +39.2% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.37x | 0.67x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$52M | $8.1B | $3.1B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $55M | $3.4B | $4.3B | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $11.5B | $7.4B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -74.40x | 17.68x | 19.33x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NAK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NAK five years ago would be worth $37,004 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,050 for FCX. Over the past 12 months, SCCO leads with a +104.8% total return vs JPM's +21.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NAK at 110.7% vs FCX's 22.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.6% | +32.3% | +29.7% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.9% | +67.6% | +104.8% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +834.9% | +85.6% | +197.7% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +270.0% | +80.5% | +230.7% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +514.1% | +589.8% | +762.4% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +110.7% | +22.9% | +43.8% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NAK's 2.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs NAK's 68.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.42x | 2.19x | 2.31x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.98 | $72.09 | $223.89 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.73 | $35.15 | $87.84 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.5% | +94.9% | +84.8% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.4 | 53.7 | 49.9 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.9M | 12.2M | 1.3M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NAK as "Buy", FCX as "Buy", SCCO as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for JPM (target: $340) vs -36.3% for NAK (target: $1). For income investors, JPM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.86% vs FCX's 0.88%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.30 | $71.44 | $156.17 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 41 | 30 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% | +1.6% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.60 | $2.96 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). SCCO leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
NAK vs FCX vs SCCO vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NAK or FCX or SCCO or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the stronger pick with 17.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NAK or FCX or SCCO or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 45. 0x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NAK or FCX or SCCO or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
(NAK) delivered a total return of +270. 0%, compared to +80. 5% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCCO returned +762. 4% versus JPM's +465. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NAK or FCX or SCCO or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. 's 2. 42β — meaning NAK is approximately 157% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NAK or FCX or SCCO or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is pulling ahead at 17.
4% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southern Copper Corporation grew EPS 24. 5% year-over-year, compared to -182. 7% for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SCCO leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NAK or FCX or SCCO or JPM?
Southern Copper Corporation (SCCO) is the more profitable company, earning 32.
3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. — meaning it keeps 32. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCCO leads at 52. 2% versus 0. 0% for NAK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NAK or FCX or SCCO or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Southern Copper Corporation's 1. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 4x forward P/E versus 26. 2x for Southern Copper Corporation — 11. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 5. 9% to $339. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — NAK or FCX or SCCO or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield), SCCO (1. 6% yield), FCX (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. NAK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NAK or FCX or SCCO or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, NAK: +514. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NAK and FCX and SCCO and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (NAK (Basic Materials) and FCX (Basic Materials) and SCCO (Basic Materials) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SCCO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. FCX, SCCO, JPM pay a dividend while NAK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.