Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
NAK logo
NAK
TECK logo
TECK
JPM logo
JPM
KO logo
KO
FCX logo
FCX
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NAK vs TECK vs JPM vs KO vs FCX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NAK
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsAMEX • CA
Market Cap$1.19B
5Y Perf.+49.0%
TECK
Teck Resources Limited

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • CA
Market Cap$32.26B
5Y Perf.+542.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$925.11B
5Y Perf.+252.1%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$345.54B
5Y Perf.+79.7%
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.

Copper

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$100.83B
5Y Perf.+506.4%

NAK vs TECK vs JPM vs KO vs FCX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NAK logoNAK
TECK logoTECK
JPM logoJPM
KO logoKO
FCX logoFCX
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsIndustrial MaterialsBanks - DiversifiedBeverages - Non-AlcoholicCopper
Market Cap$1.19B$32.26B$925.11B$345.54B$100.83B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$12.41B$280.33B$49.28B$26.42B
Net Income (TTM)$-40M$1.85B$57.05B$13.70B$2.73B
Gross Margin30.3%60.0%61.7%27.8%
Operating Margin23.9%25.9%29.3%27.8%
Forward P/E13.8x14.9x24.6x26.4x
Total Debt$3M$10.39B$942.38B$45.49B$11.50B
Cash & Equiv.$55M$5.01B$343.34B$10.27B$3.35B

NAK vs TECK vs JPM vs KO vs FCXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NAK
TECK
JPM
KO
FCX
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Northern Dynasty Mi… (NAK)100149.0+49.0%
Teck Resources Limi… (TECK)100642.9+542.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100352.1+252.1%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100179.7+79.7%
Freeport-McMoRan In… (FCX)100606.4+506.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NAK vs TECK vs JPM vs KO vs FCX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: KO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. NAK and TECK also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇KO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
NAK
Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.
The Growth Leader

NAK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.

  • 43.8% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
Best for: growth
TECK
Teck Resources Limited
The Growth Play

TECK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 262.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -14.7%
  • 5.2% 10Y total return vs NAK's 5.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.11, Low D/E 40.0%, current ratio 2.54x
  • Beta 2.11, yield 0.5%, current ratio 2.54x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 1.8%
  • PEG 0.84 vs KO's 2.20
  • Lower P/E (14.9x vs 26.4x), PEG 0.84 vs 0.88
  • Beta 0.94 vs NAK's 2.42
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.

  • 27.8% margin vs NAK's -0.3%
  • 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs TECK's 0.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
  • 13.1% ROA vs NAK's -32.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs -68.7%
Best for: quality and dividends
FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
The Basic Materials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, FCX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: basic materials exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNAK logoNAK43.8% revenue growth vs FCX's 1.1%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.9x vs 26.4x), PEG 0.84 vs 0.88
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs NAK's -0.3%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.94 vs NAK's 2.42
DividendsKO logoKO2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs TECK's 0.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)TECK logoTECK+72.4% vs KO's +16.8%
Efficiency (ROA)KO logoKO13.1% ROA vs NAK's -32.3%, ROIC 15.8% vs -68.7%

NAK vs TECK vs JPM vs KO vs FCX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Critical Minerals Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Critical Minerals Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
NAKNorthern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

TECKTeck Resources Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
FCXFreeport-McMoRan Inc.
FY 2025
Copper Cathode
31.4%$8.1B
Copper In Concentrates
24.3%$6.3B
Refined Copper Products
17.0%$4.4B
Gold
15.0%$3.9B
Molybdenum
7.6%$2.0B
Other Products Or Services
2.9%$749M
Purchased Copper
1.7%$449M

NAK vs TECK vs JPM vs KO vs FCX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGFCX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM and NAK operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FCX's 10.3%. On growth, TECK holds the edge at +72.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$12.4B$280.3B$49.3B$26.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$22M$4.8B$81.4B$15.5B$9.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$40M$1.8B$57.0B$13.7B$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$23M$482M$100.9B$12.6B$6.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+30.3%+60.0%+61.7%+27.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.9%+25.9%+29.3%+27.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.9%+20.4%+27.8%+10.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.9%+36.0%+25.5%+23.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+72.2%+12.1%+12.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+146.8%+128.8%+16.0%+18.2%+154.2%
KO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.5x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 64% valuation discount to FCX's 46.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.93x vs KO's 2.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …
Market CapShares × price$1.2B$32.3B$925.1B$345.5B$100.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.2B$36.1B$1.52T$380.8B$109.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-15.71x33.16x16.52x26.41x46.16x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.79x14.87x24.56x26.37x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.93x2.36x1.54x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.77x18.72x25.71x12.77x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.20x3.31x7.21x3.92x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share92.59x1.79x2.55x10.10x3.29x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.17x65.24x90.35x
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-99 for NAK. NAK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs NAK's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-98.8%+7.1%+15.9%+41.1%+8.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-32.3%+4.1%+1.3%+13.1%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-68.7%+4.4%+4.5%+15.8%+12.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-40.1%+4.2%+8.9%+17.3%+12.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–926575
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.18x0.40x2.60x1.33x0.37x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$52M$5.4B$599.0B$35.2B$8.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$55M$5.0B$343.3B$10.3B$3.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$10.4B$942.4B$45.5B$11.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-74.40x4.16x0.74x10.70x17.68x
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NAK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NAK five years ago would be worth $40,295 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,418 for KO. Over the past 12 months, TECK leads with a +72.4% total return vs KO's +16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NAK at 110.0% vs KO's 11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+9.2%+39.9%+2.7%+17.7%+35.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+65.1%+72.4%+24.7%+16.8%+68.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+826.1%+63.1%+141.8%+39.8%+80.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+303.0%+222.3%+126.7%+64.2%+97.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+517.4%+518.3%+492.1%+115.4%+581.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+110.0%+17.7%+34.2%+11.8%+21.7%
NAK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — JPM and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NAK's 2.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs NAK's 71.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.42x2.11x0.94x-0.20x2.19x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.98$71.25$337.25$84.04$72.09
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.73$30.98$266.85$65.35$35.15
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+71.5%+94.0%+98.2%+95.5%+97.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.856.563.253.259.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded7.7M3.0M7.0M12.9M11.9M
Evenly matched — JPM and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NAK as "Buy", TECK as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy", FCX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.3% upside for KO (target: $86) vs -39.0% for NAK (target: $1). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.54% vs TECK's 0.53%.

MetricNAK logoNAKNorthern Dynasty …TECK logoTECKTeck Resources Li…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…FCX logoFCXFreeport-McMoRan …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$1.30$64.50$339.75$86.13$71.44
# AnalystsCovering analysts526614841
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.5%+1.8%+2.5%+0.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises115561
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.50$5.95$2.04$0.60
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.2%+3.7%+0.2%+0.1%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NAK vs TECK vs JPM vs KO vs FCX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NAK or TECK or JPM or KO or FCX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is the stronger pick with 18.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 5x trailing P/E (14. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NAK or TECK or JPM or KO or FCX?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 5x versus Freeport-McMoRan Inc. at 46. 2x. On forward P/E, Teck Resources Limited is actually cheaper at 13. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 84x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 20x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NAK or TECK or JPM or KO or FCX?

Over the past 5 years, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.

(NAK) delivered a total return of +303. 0%, compared to +64. 2% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCX returned +581. 7% versus KO's +115. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NAK or TECK or JPM or KO or FCX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

20β versus Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. 's 2. 42β — meaning NAK is approximately -1310% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NAK or TECK or JPM or KO or FCX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teck Resources Limited (TECK) is pulling ahead at 18.

6% versus 1. 1% for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (FCX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teck Resources Limited grew EPS 262. 8% year-over-year, compared to -182. 7% for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NAK or TECK or JPM or KO or FCX?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus 0. 0% for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 0. 0% for NAK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NAK or TECK or JPM or KO or FCX more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 84x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 20x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teck Resources Limited (TECK) trades at 13. 8x forward P/E versus 26. 4x for Freeport-McMoRan Inc. — 12. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KO: 7. 3% to $86. 13.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NAK or TECK or JPM or KO or FCX?

In this comparison, KO (2.

5% yield), JPM (1. 8% yield), FCX (0. 9% yield), TECK (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. NAK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NAK or TECK or JPM or KO or FCX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

20), 2. 5% yield, +115. 4% 10Y return). Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NAK) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +115. 4%, NAK: +517. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NAK and TECK and JPM and KO and FCX?

These companies operate in different sectors (NAK (Basic Materials) and TECK (Basic Materials) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and FCX (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NAK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TECK is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; FCX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TECK, JPM, KO, FCX pay a dividend while NAK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.