Internet Content & Information
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NAMI vs NFLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
NAMI vs NFLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $11M | $374.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $406M | $45.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $10.98B |
| Gross Margin | 28.8% | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | 6.7% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 3.6x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $14.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $93M | $9.03B |
NAMI vs NFLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jinxin Technology H… (NAMI) | 100 | 9.5 | -90.5% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 99.0 | -1.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NAMI vs NFLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NAMI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 3.4%, current ratio 2.17x
- Lower P/E (3.6x vs 24.8x)
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.39
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs NAMI's -91.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.9% revenue growth vs NAMI's 7.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.6x vs 24.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs NAMI's 5.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs NAMI's 0.73 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -23.6% vs NAMI's -86.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs NAMI's 9.7% |
NAMI vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NAMI vs NFLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 111.2x NAMI's $406M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAMI's 5.0%. On growth, NFLX holds the edge at +17.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $406M | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +28.8% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.8% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.7% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -114.7% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NAMI leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.6x trailing earnings, NAMI trades at a 90% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.9x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11M | $374.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$2M | $379.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.60x | 34.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -0.21x | 12.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.19x | 8.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.46x | 14.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 39.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NAMI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NAMI delivers a 94.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $95 in annual profit, vs $41 for NFLX. NAMI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs NAMI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +94.8% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.7% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.4% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$87M | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $93M | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 17.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $869 for NAMI. Over the past 12 months, NFLX leads with a -23.6% total return vs NAMI's -86.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs NAMI's -55.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -49.2% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -86.9% | -23.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.3% | +166.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.3% | +75.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.3% | +875.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -55.7% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
NFLX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NAMI's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NFLX currently trades 65.8% from its 52-week high vs NAMI's 9.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.98 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.37 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +9.7% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.1 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 44.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $116.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 99 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% |
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). NAMI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
NAMI vs NFLX: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NAMI or NFLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger pick with 15. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 0% for Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares (NAMI). Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares (NAMI) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NAMI or NFLX?
On trailing P/E, Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares (NAMI) is the cheapest at 3.
6x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NAMI or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -91. 3% for Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares (NAMI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus NAMI's -91. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NAMI or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares's 0. 73β — meaning NAMI is approximately 87% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares (NAMI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NAMI or NFLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is pulling ahead at 15. 9% versus 7. 0% for Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares (NAMI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Netflix, Inc. grew EPS 27. 6% year-over-year, compared to -73. 2% for Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, NAMI leads at 17. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NAMI or NFLX?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 5. 0% for Jinxin Technology Holding Company American Depositary Shares — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus 6. 7% for NAMI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFLX leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — NAMI or NFLX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is NAMI or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, NAMI: -91. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NAMI and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NAMI is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.