NAMM
Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares
Gold
Market Cap$93M
5Y Perf.-84.3%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
NAMM vs AU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AU
AngloGold Ashanti Plc
Gold
Market Cap$50.58B
5Y Perf.+128.7%
NAMM vs AU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | NAMM | AU |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Gold |
| Market Cap | $93M | $50.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-24M | $10.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-39M | $2.86B |
| Gross Margin | 45.2% | 47.8% |
| Operating Margin | 17.1% | 45.5% |
| Forward P/E | 1.4x | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $2.44B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $698K | $2.93B |
NAMM vs AU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
NAMM
AU
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Namib Minerals Ordi… (NAMM) | 100 | 15.7 | -84.3% |
| AngloGold Ashanti P… (AU) | 100 | 228.7 | +128.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NAMM vs AU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AU leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NAMM
Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares
The Income Pick
NAMM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.01, yield 9.5%
- Lower P/E (1.4x vs 9.2x)
- 9.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs AU's 3.7%
Best for: income & stability
AU
AngloGold Ashanti Plc
The Growth Play
AU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 70.8%, EPS growth 122.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.0%
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs NAMM's -84.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 24.6%, current ratio 2.87x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AU | 70.8% revenue growth vs NAMM's 32.0% |
| Value | NAMM | Lower P/E (1.4x vs 9.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | AU | 27.6% margin vs NAMM's 4.2% |
| Stability / Safety | AU | Beta 0.79 vs NAMM's 2.01 |
| Dividends | NAMM | 9.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs AU's 3.7% |
| Momentum (1Y) | AU | +137.5% vs NAMM's -84.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AU | 20.3% ROA vs NAMM's -67.7% |
NAMM vs AU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
NAMM vs AU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAULAGGINGNAMM
NAMMNamib Minerals Ordina…
2leads
AUAngloGold Ashanti Plc
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs NAMMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AU6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
NAMM4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AU4/6
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AU5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
AU2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
NAMM2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AU and NAMM operate at a comparable scale, with $10.4B and -$24M in trailing revenue. AU is the more profitable business, keeping 27.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAMM's 4.2%. On growth, AU holds the edge at +75.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | NAMMNamib Minerals Or… | AUAngloGold Ashanti… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$24M | $10.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $4.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$39M | $2.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$604,001 | $3.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.2% | +47.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.1% | +45.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +27.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +32.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.2% | +75.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.3% | +63.1% |
AU leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
NAMM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.3x trailing earnings, AU trades at a 27% valuation discount to NAMM's 26.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NAMM's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AU's 9.1x.
| Metric | NAMMNamib Minerals Or… | AUAngloGold Ashanti… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $93M | $50.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $96M | $50.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.40x | 19.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.44x | 9.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.12x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.08x | 9.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.09x | 5.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 5.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.22x | 16.29x |
NAMM leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AU scores 8/9 vs NAMM's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | NAMMNamib Minerals Or… | AUAngloGold Ashanti… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +30.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -67.7% | +20.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +35.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +35.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$492M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $698,000 | $2.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.65x | 21.64x |
AU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AU five years ago would be worth $45,696 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,582 for NAMM. Over the past 12 months, AU leads with a +137.5% total return vs NAMM's -84.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AU at 54.8% vs NAMM's -45.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NAMMNamib Minerals Or… | AUAngloGold Ashanti… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +78.3% | +19.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -84.2% | +137.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.2% | +271.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.2% | +357.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.2% | +653.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -45.9% | +54.8% |
AU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AU is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NAMM's 2.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AU currently trades 77.6% from its 52-week high vs NAMM's 3.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | NAMMNamib Minerals Or… | AUAngloGold Ashanti… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.01x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $55.00 | $129.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.91 | $38.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.2% | +77.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.1 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 680K | 2.7M |
AU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
NAMM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, NAMM offers the higher dividend yield at 9.52% vs AU's 3.68%.
| Metric | NAMMNamib Minerals Or… | AUAngloGold Ashanti… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $133.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.5% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.17 | $3.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +100.0% | 0.0% |
NAMM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
AU leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NAMM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
Best OverallAngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
NAMM vs AU: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NAMM or AU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) is the stronger pick with 70.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 32. 0% for Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares (NAMM). AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (9. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NAMM or AU?
On trailing P/E, AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) is the cheapest at 19.
3x versus Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares at 26. 4x. On forward P/E, Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares is actually cheaper at 1. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NAMM or AU?
Over the past 5 years, AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) delivered a total return of +357.
0%, compared to -84. 2% for Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares (NAMM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AU returned +653. 9% versus NAMM's -84. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NAMM or AU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares's 2. 01β — meaning NAMM is approximately 156% more volatile than AU relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — NAMM or AU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) is pulling ahead at 70.
8% versus 32. 0% for Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares (NAMM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AngloGold Ashanti Plc grew EPS 122. 7% year-over-year, compared to -1. 2% for Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NAMM or AU?
AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) is the more profitable company, earning 26.
6% net margin versus 4. 2% for Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 26. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AU leads at 45. 1% versus 17. 1% for NAMM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AU leads at 46. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NAMM or AU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares (NAMM) trades at 1.
4x forward P/E versus 9. 2x for AngloGold Ashanti Plc — 7. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — NAMM or AU?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares (NAMM) offers the highest yield at 9. 5%, versus 3. 7% for AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU).
09Is NAMM or AU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AngloGold Ashanti Plc (AU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 3. 7% yield, +653. 9% 10Y return). Namib Minerals Ordinary Shares (NAMM) carries a higher beta of 2. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AU: +653. 9%, NAMM: -84. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NAMM and AU?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(NAMM: -13.2% · AU: 75.3%)Net Margin>
%
(NAMM: 4.2% · AU: 27.6%)P/E Ratio<
x
(NAMM: 26.4x · AU: 19.3x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.