Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NAOV vs ARAY vs LNTH vs STIM vs NSPR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Devices
NAOV vs ARAY vs LNTH vs STIM vs NSPR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Devices | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $513K | $35M | $5.92B | $128M | $54M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $429M | $1.55B | $152M | $9M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-46M | $279M | $-37M | $-49M |
| Gross Margin | 30.0% | 26.8% | 60.5% | 48.0% | 29.5% |
| Operating Margin | -351.8% | -5.1% | 18.8% | -19.4% | -5.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 17.5x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $116K | $176M | $738K | $90M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $752K | $57M | $359M | $34M | $9M |
NAOV vs ARAY vs LNTH vs STIM vs NSPR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NanoVibronix, Inc. (NAOV) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Accuray Incorporated (ARAY) | 100 | 38.6 | -61.4% |
| Lantheus Holdings, … (LNTH) | 100 | 487.4 | +387.4% |
| Neuronetics, Inc. (STIM) | 100 | 114.2 | +14.2% |
| InspireMD, Inc. (NSPR) | 100 | 12.5 | -87.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NAOV vs ARAY vs LNTH vs STIM vs NSPR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NAOV plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
ARAY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
LNTH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.47
- 41.9% 10Y total return vs STIM's -93.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 2.70x
- Beta 0.47, current ratio 2.70x
STIM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 99.2%, EPS growth 57.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.8%
- 99.2% revenue growth vs LNTH's 0.5%
Among these 5 stocks, NSPR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 99.2% revenue growth vs LNTH's 0.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.0% margin vs NSPR's -5.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs ARAY's 2.42, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.1% vs NAOV's -95.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs NSPR's -88.7%, ROIC 30.6% vs -108.3% |
NAOV vs ARAY vs LNTH vs STIM vs NSPR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NAOV vs ARAY vs LNTH vs STIM vs NSPR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LNTH leads in 4 of 6 categories
ARAY leads 1 • NAOV leads 0 • STIM leads 0 • NSPR leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNTH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNTH is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 575.9x NAOV's $3M. LNTH is the more profitable business, keeping 18.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NSPR's -5.4%. On growth, NAOV holds the edge at +92.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $429M | $1.5B | $152M | $9M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | -$15M | $347M | -$27M | -$49M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$46M | $279M | -$37M | -$49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$28M | $372M | -$4M | -$37M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.0% | +26.8% | +60.5% | +48.0% | +29.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | -5.1% | +18.8% | -19.4% | -5.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -133.0% | -10.8% | +18.0% | -24.5% | -5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | -6.5% | +24.0% | -2.6% | -4.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.0% | -7.4% | +1.2% | +7.8% | +61.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +129.2% | -6.1% | +76.5% | +23.8% | +26.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ARAY leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ARAY's 11.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LNTH's 14.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $512,711 | $35M | $5.9B | $128M | $54M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$123,289 | $154M | $5.6B | $184M | $48M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.14x | -18.91x | 26.69x | -3.12x | -1.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 17.52x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.99x | 14.61x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.20x | 0.08x | 3.84x | 0.86x | 6.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.82x | 0.37x | 5.72x | 4.62x | 1.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 16.73x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LNTH leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LNTH delivers a 24.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-140 for STIM. LNTH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STIM's 3.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARAY scores 6/9 vs NAOV's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.4% | -77.5% | +24.3% | -139.8% | -116.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -6.6% | -10.1% | +12.4% | -27.1% | -88.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.7% | +3.0% | +30.6% | -26.6% | -108.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -139.7% | +2.8% | +17.1% | -28.5% | -100.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 2.17x | 0.00x | 3.44x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$636,000 | $119M | -$358M | $56M | -$7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $752,000 | $57M | $359M | $34M | $9M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $116,000 | $176M | $738,000 | $90M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -23.76x | -1.86x | 11.72x | -2.43x | -373.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LNTH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LNTH five years ago would be worth $41,420 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9 for NAOV. Over the past 12 months, LNTH leads with a +13.1% total return vs NAOV's -95.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LNTH at -1.4% vs NAOV's -83.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.4% | -65.5% | +35.3% | +27.8% | -37.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -95.7% | -78.4% | +13.1% | -59.6% | -54.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -91.8% | -4.0% | -16.4% | -21.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -93.9% | +314.2% | -86.7% | -77.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -94.5% | +4192.5% | -93.4% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -83.3% | -56.6% | -1.4% | -5.8% | -7.8% |
Risk & Volatility
LNTH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNTH is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARAY's 2.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LNTH currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs NAOV's 4.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.49x | 2.42x | 0.47x | 1.90x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.50 | $2.10 | $93.00 | $4.85 | $2.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.99 | $0.28 | $47.25 | $0.80 | $1.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.3% | +14.0% | +97.8% | +37.9% | +39.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.1 | 58.4 | 61.2 | 59.6 | 34.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 335K | 1.4M | 886K | 2.0M | 98K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LNTH as "Buy", STIM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 334.8% upside for STIM (target: $8) vs 11.0% for LNTH (target: $101).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $101.00 | $8.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 17 | 7 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LNTH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARAY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
NAOV vs ARAY vs LNTH vs STIM vs NSPR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NAOV or ARAY or LNTH or STIM or NSPR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Neuronetics, Inc.
(STIM) is the stronger pick with 99. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH). Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) offers the better valuation at 26. 7x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NAOV or ARAY or LNTH or STIM or NSPR?
Over the past 5 years, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) delivered a total return of +314. 2%, compared to -99. 9% for NanoVibronix, Inc. (NAOV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNTH returned +41. 9% versus NSPR's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NAOV or ARAY or LNTH or STIM or NSPR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus Accuray Incorporated's 2. 42β — meaning ARAY is approximately 416% more volatile than LNTH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Neuronetics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NAOV or ARAY or LNTH or STIM or NSPR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Neuronetics, Inc.
(STIM) is pulling ahead at 99. 2% versus 0. 5% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Accuray Incorporated grew EPS 90. 3% year-over-year, compared to -21. 8% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, STIM leads at 31. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NAOV or ARAY or LNTH or STIM or NSPR?
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -543. 3% for InspireMD, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNTH leads at 20. 2% versus -547. 0% for NSPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LNTH leads at 61. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NAOV or ARAY or LNTH or STIM or NSPR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STIM: 334.
8% to $8. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — NAOV or ARAY or LNTH or STIM or NSPR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is NAOV or ARAY or LNTH or STIM or NSPR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
(LNTH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47)). Accuray Incorporated (ARAY) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNTH: +41. 9%, ARAY: -94. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NAOV and ARAY and LNTH and STIM and NSPR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NAOV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARAY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LNTH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; NSPR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.