Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NAOV vs GKOS vs LNTH vs NVCR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NAOV
NanoVibronix, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$513K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
GKOS
Glaukos Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.85B
5Y Perf.+206.3%
LNTH
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.92B
5Y Perf.+387.4%
NVCR
NovoCure Limited

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • JE
Market Cap$1.92B
5Y Perf.-81.6%

NAOV vs GKOS vs LNTH vs NVCR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NAOV logoNAOV
GKOS logoGKOS
LNTH logoLNTH
NVCR logoNVCR
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - DevicesDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericMedical - Instruments & Supplies
Market Cap$513K$7.85B$5.92B$1.92B
Revenue (TTM)$3M$551M$1.55B$674M
Net Income (TTM)$-4M$-189M$279M$-173M
Gross Margin30.0%78.1%60.5%75.2%
Operating Margin-351.8%-15.6%18.8%-27.2%
Forward P/E17.5x
Total Debt$116K$140M$738K$290M
Cash & Equiv.$752K$91M$359M$103M

NAOV vs GKOS vs LNTH vs NVCRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NAOV
GKOS
LNTH
NVCR
StockMay 20Mar 26Return
NanoVibronix, Inc. (NAOV)1000.0-100.0%
Glaukos Corporation (GKOS)100306.3+206.3%
Lantheus Holdings, … (LNTH)100487.4+387.4%
NovoCure Limited (NVCR)10018.4-81.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NAOV vs GKOS vs LNTH vs NVCR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LNTH leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Glaukos Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NAOV
NanoVibronix, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick

NAOV plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
GKOS
Glaukos Corporation
The Growth Play

GKOS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.

  • Rev growth 32.3%, EPS growth -18.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.5%
  • Beta 1.20, current ratio 4.69x
  • 32.3% revenue growth vs LNTH's 0.5%
  • +52.0% vs NAOV's -95.7%
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
LNTH
Lantheus Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

LNTH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.47
  • 41.9% 10Y total return vs GKOS's 457.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 2.70x
  • 18.0% margin vs NAOV's -133.0%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
NVCR
NovoCure Limited
The Secondary Option

NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGKOS logoGKOS32.3% revenue growth vs LNTH's 0.5%
Quality / MarginsLNTH logoLNTH18.0% margin vs NAOV's -133.0%
Stability / SafetyLNTH logoLNTHBeta 0.47 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)GKOS logoGKOS+52.0% vs NAOV's -95.7%
Efficiency (ROA)LNTH logoLNTH12.4% ROA vs GKOS's -20.1%, ROIC 30.6% vs -9.2%

NAOV vs GKOS vs LNTH vs NVCR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NAOVNanoVibronix, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

GKOSGlaukos Corporation
FY 2019
Glaucoma
97.5%$231M
Corneal Health
2.5%$6M
LNTHLantheus Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
33.4%$1.5B
Radiopharmaceutical Oncology
21.9%$989M
PYLARIFY
21.9%$989M
Total Precision Diagnostics
10.9%$493M
DEFINITY
7.3%$330M
Techne Lite
1.9%$87M
Strategic Partnerships And Other
1.3%$59M
Other (2)
1.3%$59M
NVCRNovoCure Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

NAOV vs GKOS vs LNTH vs NVCR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLNTHLAGGINGNVCR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LNTH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

LNTH is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 575.9x NAOV's $3M. LNTH is the more profitable business, keeping 18.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAOV's -133.0%. On growth, NAOV holds the edge at +92.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNAOV logoNAOVNanoVibronix, Inc.GKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…LNTH logoLNTHLantheus Holdings…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure Limited
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3M$551M$1.5B$674M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$9M-$40M$347M-$165M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$4M-$189M$279M-$173M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$7M-$18M$372M-$48M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+30.0%+78.1%+60.5%+75.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.5%-15.6%+18.8%-27.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-133.0%-34.3%+18.0%-25.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.7%-3.4%+24.0%-7.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+92.0%+41.2%+1.2%+12.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+129.2%-6.3%+76.5%-100.0%
LNTH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NAOV leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricNAOV logoNAOVNanoVibronix, Inc.GKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…LNTH logoLNTHLantheus Holdings…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure Limited
Market CapShares × price$512,711$7.9B$5.9B$1.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$123,289$7.9B$5.6B$2.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.14x-40.90x26.69x-13.80x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.17.52x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.61x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.20x15.47x3.84x2.92x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.82x11.69x5.72x5.51x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF16.73x
NAOV leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LNTH leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

LNTH delivers a 24.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-51 for NVCR. LNTH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LNTH scores 5/9 vs NAOV's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricNAOV logoNAOVNanoVibronix, Inc.GKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…LNTH logoLNTHLantheus Holdings…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure Limited
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-8.4%-26.5%+24.3%-50.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-6.6%-20.1%+12.4%-16.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-7.7%-9.2%+30.6%-16.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-139.7%-10.3%+17.1%-28.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92355
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.19x0.21x0.00x0.85x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$636,000$49M-$358M$187M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$752,000$91M$359M$103M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$116,000$140M$738,000$290M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-23.76x-18.69x11.72x-96.80x
LNTH leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — GKOS and LNTH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LNTH five years ago would be worth $41,420 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9 for NAOV. Over the past 12 months, GKOS leads with a +52.0% total return vs NAOV's -95.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GKOS at 31.7% vs NAOV's -83.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNAOV logoNAOVNanoVibronix, Inc.GKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…LNTH logoLNTHLantheus Holdings…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure Limited
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-22.4%+21.2%+35.3%+28.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-95.7%+52.0%+13.1%+1.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.5%+128.7%-4.0%-75.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.9%+61.5%+314.2%-91.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-100.0%+457.1%+4192.5%+30.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-83.3%+31.7%-1.4%-37.6%
Evenly matched — GKOS and LNTH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

LNTH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

LNTH is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LNTH currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs NAOV's 4.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNAOV logoNAOVNanoVibronix, Inc.GKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…LNTH logoLNTHLantheus Holdings…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure Limited
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.49x1.20x0.47x2.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$44.50$146.75$93.00$20.06
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.99$73.16$47.25$9.82
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+4.3%+91.4%+97.8%+83.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.163.061.269.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded335K678K886K1.5M
LNTH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: GKOS as "Buy", LNTH as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 9.3% for GKOS (target: $147).

MetricNAOV logoNAOVNanoVibronix, Inc.GKOS logoGKOSGlaukos Corporati…LNTH logoLNTHLantheus Holdings…NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure Limited
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$146.67$101.00$33.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts241715
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+5.1%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

LNTH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NAOV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallLantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NAOV vs GKOS vs LNTH vs NVCR: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NAOV or GKOS or LNTH or NVCR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is the stronger pick with 32.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 5% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH). Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) offers the better valuation at 26. 7x trailing P/E (17. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — NAOV or GKOS or LNTH or NVCR?

Over the past 5 years, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) delivered a total return of +314. 2%, compared to -99. 9% for NanoVibronix, Inc. (NAOV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNTH returned +41. 9% versus NAOV's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — NAOV or GKOS or LNTH or NVCR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 47β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 20β — meaning NVCR is approximately 370% more volatile than LNTH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — NAOV or GKOS or LNTH or NVCR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) is pulling ahead at 32.

3% versus 0. 5% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc. (LNTH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NanoVibronix, Inc. grew EPS 35. 2% year-over-year, compared to -21. 8% for Lantheus Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GKOS leads at 21. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — NAOV or GKOS or LNTH or NVCR?

Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus -144. 8% for NanoVibronix, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNTH leads at 20. 2% versus -140. 0% for NAOV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GKOS leads at 77. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is NAOV or GKOS or LNTH or NVCR more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99.

0% to $33. 50.

07

Which pays a better dividend — NAOV or GKOS or LNTH or NVCR?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is NAOV or GKOS or LNTH or NVCR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lantheus Holdings, Inc.

(LNTH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 47)). NovoCure Limited (NVCR) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNTH: +41. 9%, NVCR: +30. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between NAOV and GKOS and LNTH and NVCR?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NAOV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GKOS is a small-cap high-growth stock; LNTH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NAOV

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 46%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GKOS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 20%
  • Gross Margin > 46%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LNTH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVCR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NAOV and GKOS and LNTH and NVCR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NAOV: 92.0% · GKOS: 41.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.