Compare Stocks

3 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NAT vs TNK vs INSW

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NAT
Nordic American Tankers Limited

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • BM
Market Cap$1.24B
5Y Perf.+28.0%
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • CA
Market Cap$2.83B
5Y Perf.+367.6%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.46B
5Y Perf.+297.6%

NAT vs TNK vs INSW — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NAT logoNAT
TNK logoTNK
INSW logoINSW
IndustryMarine ShippingOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$1.24B$2.83B$4.46B
Revenue (TTM)$281M$952M$676M
Net Income (TTM)$2M$351M$546M
Gross Margin16.6%27.5%40.6%
Operating Margin6.2%27.5%44.4%
Forward P/E10.4x6.0x8.5x
Total Debt$270M$55M$576M
Cash & Equiv.$39M$831M$117M

NAT vs TNK vs INSWLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NAT
TNK
INSW
StockMay 20May 26Return
Nordic American Tan… (NAT)100128.0+28.0%
Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK)100467.6+367.6%
International Seawa… (INSW)100397.6+297.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NAT vs TNK vs INSW

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NAT and INSW are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. International Seaways, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
NAT
Nordic American Tankers Limited
The Income Pick

NAT has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 7.1%
  • Rev growth -10.7%, EPS growth -53.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.3%
  • Beta 0.27, yield 7.1%, current ratio 1.65x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

TNK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 2.7%, current ratio 7.98x
  • Lower P/E (6.0x vs 8.5x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

INSW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 10.1% 10Y total return vs TNK's 187.7%
  • 80.8% margin vs NAT's 0.7%
  • +160.2% vs TNK's +80.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNAT logoNAT-10.7% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6%
ValueTNK logoTNKLower P/E (6.0x vs 8.5x)
Quality / MarginsINSW logoINSW80.8% margin vs NAT's 0.7%
Stability / SafetyNAT logoNATBeta 0.27 vs INSW's 0.43
DividendsNAT logoNAT7.1% yield, vs INSW's 3.2%
Momentum (1Y)INSW logoINSW+160.2% vs TNK's +80.3%
Efficiency (ROA)INSW logoINSW20.1% ROA vs NAT's 0.2%, ROIC 9.4% vs 7.5%

NAT vs TNK vs INSW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NATNordic American Tankers Limited
FY 2024
Spot Charter
78.2%$274M
Time Charter
21.8%$76M
TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd.
FY 2024
Voyage charters
59.3%$1.1B
Voyage Charters - Suezmax
30.4%$547M
Other revenue
7.6%$136M
Time-charter
1.4%$26M
Time Charters - Suezmax
0.7%$13M
Ship-to-ship support services, Other revenue
0.6%$11M
INSWInternational Seaways, Inc.
FY 2025
Pool Revenue Leases
76.1%$642M
Time and Bareboat Charter Leases
18.7%$158M
Voyage Charter Leases
5.2%$44M

NAT vs TNK vs INSW — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTNKLAGGINGNAT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

TNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $952M annually — 3.4x NAT's $281M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAT's 0.7%. On growth, NAT holds the edge at -8.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNAT logoNATNordic American T…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$281M$952M$676M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$75M$348M$465M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$2M$351M$546M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$112M$113M$193M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+16.6%+27.5%+40.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.2%+27.5%+44.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.7%+36.9%+80.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-39.8%+11.8%+28.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-8.8%-26.4%-91.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-131.5%+46.0%+4.8%
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 8.0x trailing earnings, TNK trades at a 70% valuation discount to NAT's 26.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TNK's 6.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NAT's 11.0x.

MetricNAT logoNATNordic American T…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…
Market CapShares × price$1.2B$2.8B$4.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.5B$2.1B$4.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS26.59x8.05x14.48x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.40x6.00x8.52x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.26x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.01x6.80x10.48x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.54x2.97x5.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.41x1.38x2.21x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.87x25.09x117.08x
TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

INSW delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $0 for NAT. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAT's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSW scores 6/9 vs TNK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricNAT logoNATNordic American T…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.4%+17.2%+27.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.2%+15.7%+20.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.5%+12.5%+9.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.9%+10.9%+12.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9546
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.53x0.03x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$231M-$776M$459M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$39M$831M$117M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$270M$55M$576M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.06x109.95x0.90x
TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,696 for NAT. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +160.2% total return vs TNK's +80.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 40.9% vs NAT's 27.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNAT logoNATNordic American T…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+78.6%+58.3%+96.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+142.1%+80.3%+160.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+107.6%+136.5%+179.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+117.0%+513.8%+438.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-40.4%+187.7%+1014.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+27.6%+33.2%+40.9%
INSW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NAT and INSW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NAT is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INSW's 0.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INSW currently trades 98.5% from its 52-week high vs NAT's 92.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNAT logoNATNordic American T…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.27x0.35x0.43x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.34$83.54$91.58
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$2.54$41.05$35.60
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.3%+97.3%+98.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.457.967.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.3M542K597K
Evenly matched — NAT and INSW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NAT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: NAT as "Hold", TNK as "Buy", INSW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.7% upside for TNK (target: $90) vs -40.2% for NAT (target: $4). For income investors, NAT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.14% vs TNK's 2.44%.

MetricNAT logoNATNordic American T…TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…INSW logoINSWInternational Sea…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.50$90.00$83.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts192313
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+7.1%+2.4%+3.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.42$1.98$2.92
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%0.0%0.0%
NAT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

INSW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). TNK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.

Best OverallTeekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NAT vs TNK vs INSW: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NAT or TNK or INSW a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) is the stronger pick with -10.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NAT or TNK or INSW?

On trailing P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) is the cheapest at 8. 0x versus Nordic American Tankers Limited at 26. 6x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NAT or TNK or INSW?

Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 8%, compared to +117. 0% for Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1015% versus NAT's -40. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NAT or TNK or INSW?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

27β versus International Seaways, Inc. 's 0. 43β — meaning INSW is approximately 57% more volatile than NAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 53% for Nordic American Tankers Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NAT or TNK or INSW?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) is pulling ahead at -10.

7% versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Tankers Ltd. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -53. 2% for Nordic American Tankers Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, NAT leads at 21. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NAT or TNK or INSW?

Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 9% net margin versus 13. 3% for Nordic American Tankers Limited — meaning it keeps 36. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 22. 1% for NAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INSW leads at 42. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NAT or TNK or INSW more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for Nordic American Tankers Limited — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 10. 7% to $90. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NAT or TNK or INSW?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Nordic American Tankers Limited (NAT) offers the highest yield at 7. 1%, versus 2. 4% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK).

09

Is NAT or TNK or INSW better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.

(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 2% yield, +1015% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1015%, NAT: -40. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NAT and TNK and INSW?

These companies operate in different sectors (NAT (Industrials) and TNK (Energy) and INSW (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NAT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TNK is a small-cap deep-value stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NAT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 2.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TNK

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INSW

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 48%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NAT and TNK and INSW on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NAT: -8.8% · TNK: -26.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(NAT: 26.6x · TNK: 8.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.