Restaurants
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NATH vs TXRH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
NATH vs TXRH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $952M | $10.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $158M | $6.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21M | $415M |
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 18.7% |
| Operating Margin | 20.1% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 17.3x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $56M | $1.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $135M |
NATH vs TXRH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nathan's Famous, In… (NATH) | 100 | 181.1 | +81.1% |
| Texas Roadhouse, In… (TXRH) | 100 | 304.6 | +204.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NATH vs TXRH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NATH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.52, yield 2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, current ratio 2.69x
- Beta 0.52, yield 2.0%, current ratio 2.69x
TXRH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth -5.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.5%
- 288.0% 10Y total return vs NATH's 163.6%
- PEG 1.17 vs NATH's 1.33
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs NATH's 6.9% | |
| Value | PEG 1.17 vs 1.33 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs TXRH's 6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs TXRH's 0.70 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, vs TXRH's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.2% vs TXRH's -6.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.1% ROA vs TXRH's 12.2%, ROIC 227.7% vs 14.5% |
NATH vs TXRH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NATH vs TXRH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NATH leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TXRH is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 38.4x NATH's $158M. NATH is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TXRH's 6.8%. On growth, TXRH holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $158M | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $33M | $709M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | $415M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $441M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +18.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.9% | +12.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.8% | +10.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TXRH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.3x trailing earnings, NATH trades at a 33% valuation discount to TXRH's 25.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TXRH offers better value at 0.38x vs NATH's 1.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $952M | $10.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $980M | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.29x | 25.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.33x | 0.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.18x | 17.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.43x | 1.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 7.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.07x | 30.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NATH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NATH scores 6/9 vs TXRH's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +37.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +42.1% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +14.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +104.3% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $28M | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $135M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $56M | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.11x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — NATH and TXRH each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NATH five years ago would be worth $17,213 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,160 for TXRH. Over the past 12 months, NATH leads with a +7.2% total return vs TXRH's -6.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TXRH at 15.4% vs NATH's 14.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.9% | -7.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.2% | -6.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.5% | +53.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.1% | +61.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.6% | +288.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.6% | +15.4% |
Risk & Volatility
NATH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NATH is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TXRH's 0.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NATH currently trades 85.6% from its 52-week high vs TXRH's 79.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $118.50 | $199.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $88.67 | $153.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.6% | +79.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 45.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24K | 983K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NATH and TXRH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, NATH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.97% vs TXRH's 1.72%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $191.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.00 | $2.71 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% |
NATH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TXRH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NATH vs TXRH: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NATH or TXRH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is the stronger pick with 9. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 9% for Nathan's Famous, Inc. (NATH). Nathan's Famous, Inc. (NATH) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) a "Hold" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NATH or TXRH?
On trailing P/E, Nathan's Famous, Inc.
(NATH) is the cheapest at 17. 3x versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. at 25. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NATH or TXRH?
Over the past 5 years, Nathan's Famous, Inc.
(NATH) delivered a total return of +72. 1%, compared to +61. 6% for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TXRH returned +288. 0% versus NATH's +163. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NATH or TXRH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nathan's Famous, Inc.
(NATH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Texas Roadhouse, Inc. 's 0. 70β — meaning TXRH is approximately 34% more volatile than NATH relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — NATH or TXRH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
(TXRH) is pulling ahead at 9. 4% versus 6. 9% for Nathan's Famous, Inc. (NATH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nathan's Famous, Inc. grew EPS 22. 3% year-over-year, compared to -5. 7% for Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TXRH leads at 13. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NATH or TXRH?
Nathan's Famous, Inc.
(NATH) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus 6. 9% for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NATH leads at 24. 6% versus 8. 6% for TXRH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NATH leads at 35. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — NATH or TXRH?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Nathan's Famous, Inc. (NATH) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 1. 7% for Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH).
08Is NATH or TXRH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nathan's Famous, Inc.
(NATH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 2. 0% yield, +163. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NATH: +163. 6%, TXRH: +288. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NATH and TXRH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NATH is a small-cap deep-value stock; TXRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.