Restaurants
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NATH vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
NATH vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $952M | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $158M | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 29.4% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 20.1% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 17.3x | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $56M | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $10.73B |
NATH vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nathan's Famous, In… (NATH) | 100 | 181.1 | +81.1% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NATH vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NATH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 22.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.9%
- PEG 1.33 vs WMT's 4.06
- Beta 0.52, yield 2.0%, current ratio 2.69x
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs NATH's 163.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs WMT's 4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.3x vs 44.7x), PEG 1.33 vs 4.06 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.6% margin vs WMT's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs NATH's 0.52 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, vs WMT's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs NATH's +7.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.1% ROA vs WMT's 7.9%, ROIC 227.7% vs 14.7% |
NATH vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NATH vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NATH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 4455.8x NATH's $158M. NATH is the more profitable business, keeping 13.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WMT's 3.3%. On growth, NATH holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $158M | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $33M | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.6% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.9% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.8% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
WMT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.3x trailing earnings, NATH trades at a 64% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NATH offers better value at 1.33x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $952M | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $980M | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.29x | 47.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.33x | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.18x | 24.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.43x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 10.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.07x | 24.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NATH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +42.1% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +104.3% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $28M | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $56M | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.11x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,213 for NATH. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.7% total return vs NATH's +7.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs NATH's 14.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.9% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.2% | +32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.5% | +160.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.1% | +186.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.6% | +499.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.6% | +37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NATH's 0.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs NATH's 85.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $118.50 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $88.67 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.6% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.3 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 24K | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NATH and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, NATH offers the higher dividend yield at 1.97% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.00 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
WMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). NATH leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
NATH vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NATH or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nathan's Famous, Inc.
(NATH) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). Nathan's Famous, Inc. (NATH) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NATH or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Nathan's Famous, Inc.
(NATH) is the cheapest at 17. 3x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NATH or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to +72. 1% for Nathan's Famous, Inc. (NATH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus NATH's +163. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NATH or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Nathan's Famous, Inc. 's 0. 52β — meaning NATH is approximately 345% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — NATH or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nathan's Famous, Inc.
(NATH) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nathan's Famous, Inc. grew EPS 22. 3% year-over-year, compared to 13. 3% for Walmart Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NATH leads at 8. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NATH or WMT?
Nathan's Famous, Inc.
(NATH) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NATH leads at 24. 6% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NATH leads at 35. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — NATH or WMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Nathan's Famous, Inc. (NATH) offers the highest yield at 2. 0%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
08Is NATH or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, NATH: +163. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NATH and WMT?
These companies operate in different sectors (NATH (Consumer Cyclical) and WMT (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NATH is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.