Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NBHC vs BOKF vs FFIN vs CVBF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
NBHC vs BOKF vs FFIN vs CVBF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.67B | $8.18B | $4.83B | $2.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $584M | $3.33B | $826M | $644M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $110M | $578M | $254M | $209M |
| Gross Margin | 69.2% | 63.7% | 71.8% | 79.7% |
| Operating Margin | 24.4% | 21.4% | 37.5% | 43.7% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | 13.1x | 16.5x | 14.7x |
| Total Debt | $72M | $4.63B | $22M | $991M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $417M | $1.66B | $1.08B | $108M |
NBHC vs BOKF vs FFIN vs CVBF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| National Bank Holdi… (NBHC) | 100 | 162.0 | +62.0% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 238.5 | +138.5% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 116.5 | +16.5% |
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NBHC vs BOKF vs FFIN vs CVBF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NBHC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 3.5% vs BOKF's 2.5%
- Lower P/E (12.6x vs 14.7x)
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 159.2% 10Y total return vs NBHC's 151.6%
- PEG 1.60 vs CVBF's 4.64
- +42.7% vs FFIN's -5.5%
FFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.78, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth 13.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 0.68x
- Beta 0.78, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.68x
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 3.8% yield, vs BOKF's 1.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.7% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.6x vs 14.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBHC's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs BOKF's 0.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, vs BOKF's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs FFIN's -5.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBHC's 0.4% |
NBHC vs BOKF vs FFIN vs CVBF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NBHC vs BOKF vs FFIN vs CVBF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories
NBHC leads 1 • FFIN leads 1 • BOKF leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 5.7x NBHC's $584M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 17.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $584M | $3.3B | $826M | $644M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $165M | $794M | $320M | $294M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $110M | $578M | $254M | $209M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $114M | $1.7B | $283M | $217M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.2% | +63.7% | +71.8% | +79.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +21.4% | +37.5% | +43.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +17.4% | +30.7% | +32.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.6% | +51.4% | +34.3% | +33.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -42.5% | +1.8% | -7.7% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NBHC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, CVBF trades at a 27% valuation discount to FFIN's 19.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BOKF offers better value at 1.79x vs CVBF's 4.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $8.2B | $4.8B | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $11.2B | $3.8B | $3.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.35x | 14.66x | 19.01x | 13.97x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.61x | 13.09x | 16.54x | 14.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.79x | 4.22x | 4.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.05x | 14.05x | 11.79x | 13.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.86x | 2.46x | 5.85x | 4.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 1.39x | 2.52x | 1.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.60x | 14.22x | 15.72x | 13.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $8 for NBHC. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FFIN scores 8/9 vs CVBF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | +9.8% | +14.2% | +9.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.1% | +1.7% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +5.2% | +12.4% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.6% | +8.4% | +16.6% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.78x | 0.01x | 0.43x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$345M | $3.0B | -$1.1B | $883M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $417M | $1.7B | $1.1B | $108M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $72M | $4.6B | $22M | $991M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.83x | 0.59x | 1.54x | 2.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOKF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOKF five years ago would be worth $16,653 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,409 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +42.7% total return vs FFIN's -5.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVBF at 18.0% vs FFIN's 7.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.1% | +14.5% | +13.5% | +14.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.3% | +42.7% | -5.5% | +16.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +45.0% | +60.8% | +24.3% | +64.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.1% | +66.5% | -25.9% | +15.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +151.6% | +159.2% | +136.4% | +66.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.2% | +17.2% | +7.5% | +18.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBHC and FFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FFIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOKF's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBHC currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 86.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.84x | 0.87x | 0.78x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.02 | $139.73 | $38.74 | $21.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.06 | $91.35 | $28.11 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.4% | +96.3% | +86.9% | +98.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 56.4 | 61.3 | 60.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 295K | 262K | 683K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BOKF and CVBF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBHC as "Hold", BOKF as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.9% upside for NBHC (target: $52) vs -1.9% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.85% vs BOKF's 1.80%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $52.00 | $132.00 | $39.25 | $24.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 21 | 15 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +1.8% | +2.2% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 21 | 15 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.21 | $2.42 | $0.74 | $0.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +5.1% | 0.0% | +2.8% |
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). NBHC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NBHC vs BOKF vs FFIN vs CVBF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NBHC or BOKF or FFIN or CVBF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (14. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate National Bank Holdings Corporation (NBHC) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NBHC or BOKF or FFIN or CVBF?
On trailing P/E, CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the cheapest at 14. 0x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 19. 0x. On forward P/E, National Bank Holdings Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: BOK Financial Corporation wins at 1. 60x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NBHC or BOKF or FFIN or CVBF?
Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +66.
5%, compared to -25. 9% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOKF returned +159. 2% versus CVBF's +66. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NBHC or BOKF or FFIN or CVBF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 0. 87β — meaning BOKF is approximately 11% more volatile than FFIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 78% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NBHC or BOKF or FFIN or CVBF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Financial Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 13. 5% year-over-year, compared to -7. 5% for National Bank Holdings Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NBHC or BOKF or FFIN or CVBF?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 17. 4% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 21. 4% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NBHC or BOKF or FFIN or CVBF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 60x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 64x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, National Bank Holdings Corporation (NBHC) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 16. 5x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 3. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBHC: 18. 9% to $52. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NBHC or BOKF or FFIN or CVBF?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 1. 8% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF).
09Is NBHC or BOKF or FFIN or CVBF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), 2. 2% yield, +136. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FFIN: +136. 4%, CVBF: +66. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NBHC and BOKF and FFIN and CVBF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NBHC is a small-cap deep-value stock; BOKF is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.