Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NBIX vs FOLD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NBIX
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$15.01B
5Y Perf.+19.9%
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.55B
5Y Perf.+15.9%

NBIX vs FOLD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NBIX logoNBIX
FOLD logoFOLD
IndustryDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericBiotechnology
Market Cap$15.01B$4.55B
Revenue (TTM)$3.10B$634M
Net Income (TTM)$669M$-27M
Gross Margin98.2%87.9%
Operating Margin25.4%5.2%
Forward P/E24.1x40.6x
Total Debt$415M$483M
Cash & Equiv.$713M$214M

NBIX vs FOLDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NBIX
FOLD
StockMay 20May 26Return
Neurocrine Bioscien… (NBIX)100119.9+19.9%
Amicus Therapeutics… (FOLD)100115.9+15.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NBIX vs FOLD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NBIX leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NBIX
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
The Growth Play

NBIX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 21.4%, EPS growth 41.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.3%
  • 233.2% 10Y total return vs FOLD's 119.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 12.8%, current ratio 3.39x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
FOLD
Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.
The Income Pick

FOLD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • beta 0.63
  • Beta 0.63, current ratio 2.84x
  • Beta 0.63 vs NBIX's 0.76
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNBIX logoNBIX21.4% revenue growth vs FOLD's 20.0%
ValueNBIX logoNBIXLower P/E (24.1x vs 40.6x)
Quality / MarginsNBIX logoNBIX21.6% margin vs FOLD's -4.3%
Stability / SafetyFOLD logoFOLDBeta 0.63 vs NBIX's 0.76
DividendsTieNeither stock pays a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)FOLD logoFOLD+137.9% vs NBIX's +23.0%
Efficiency (ROA)NBIX logoNBIX15.1% ROA vs FOLD's -3.2%, ROIC 16.1% vs 5.3%

NBIX vs FOLD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NBIXNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
99.1%$2.8B
Collaboration Revenue
0.9%$27M
FOLDAmicus Therapeutics, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NBIX vs FOLD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNBIXLAGGINGFOLD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NBIX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

NBIX is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 4.9x FOLD's $634M. NBIX is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FOLD's -4.3%. On growth, NBIX holds the edge at +42.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNBIX logoNBIXNeurocrine Biosci…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.1B$634M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$811M$40M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$669M-$27M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$831M$30M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+98.2%+87.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+25.4%+5.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+21.6%-4.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+26.8%+4.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+42.2%+23.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+22.9%-89.0%
NBIX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NBIX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, NBIX's 22.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FOLD's 114.9x.

MetricNBIX logoNBIXNeurocrine Biosci…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
Market CapShares × price$15.0B$4.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$14.7B$4.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS32.03x-164.85x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.24.07x40.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate13.69x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.67x114.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.25x7.17x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.71x16.29x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF20.05x152.43x
NBIX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NBIX leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

NBIX delivers a 21.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-12 for FOLD. NBIX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FOLD's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBIX scores 6/9 vs FOLD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricNBIX logoNBIXNeurocrine Biosci…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+21.6%-12.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+15.1%-3.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+16.1%+5.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+17.4%+5.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.13x1.76x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$298M$269M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$713M$214M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$415M$483M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.00x
NBIX leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NBIX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NBIX five years ago would be worth $16,431 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,862 for FOLD. Over the past 12 months, FOLD leads with a +137.9% total return vs NBIX's +23.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NBIX at 15.2% vs FOLD's 6.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNBIX logoNBIXNeurocrine Biosci…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+6.4%+1.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+23.0%+137.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+52.8%+19.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+64.3%+48.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+233.2%+119.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+15.2%+6.0%
NBIX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FOLD is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBIX's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FOLD currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs NBIX's 93.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNBIX logoNBIXNeurocrine Biosci…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.76x0.63x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$160.18$14.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$115.66$5.51
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.4%+99.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10074.672.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M3.0M
FOLD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Wall Street rates NBIX as "Buy" and FOLD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for NBIX (target: $178) vs 0.1% for FOLD (target: $15).

MetricNBIX logoNBIXNeurocrine Biosci…FOLD logoFOLDAmicus Therapeuti…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$178.09$14.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts3724
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.1%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

NBIX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FOLD leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NBIX vs FOLD: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NBIX or FOLD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

(NBIX) is the stronger pick with 21. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 20. 0% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD). Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX) offers the better valuation at 32. 0x trailing P/E (24. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NBIX or FOLD?

On forward P/E, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

is actually cheaper at 24. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NBIX or FOLD?

Over the past 5 years, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

(NBIX) delivered a total return of +64. 3%, compared to +48. 6% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBIX returned +233. 2% versus FOLD's +119. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NBIX or FOLD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. 's 0. 76β — meaning NBIX is approximately 20% more volatile than FOLD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. (NBIX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 176% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NBIX or FOLD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

(NBIX) is pulling ahead at 21. 4% versus 20. 0% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. (FOLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 51. 2% year-over-year, compared to 41. 9% for Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOLD leads at 24. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NBIX or FOLD?

Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

(NBIX) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 7% net margin versus -4. 3% for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBIX leads at 21. 6% versus 5. 4% for FOLD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBIX leads at 98. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NBIX or FOLD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.

(NBIX) trades at 24. 1x forward P/E versus 40. 6x for Amicus Therapeutics, Inc. — 16. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBIX: 19. 1% to $178. 09.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NBIX or FOLD?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is NBIX or FOLD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amicus Therapeutics, Inc.

(FOLD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), +119. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOLD: +119. 2%, NBIX: +233. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NBIX and FOLD?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

NBIX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 21%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FOLD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Gross Margin > 52%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NBIX and FOLD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NBIX: 42.2% · FOLD: 23.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.