Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
NBN vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FIS vs KO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
NBN vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FIS vs KO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $1.04B | $272M | $184M | $20.26B | $355.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $355M | $120M | $135M | $11.66B | $49.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $87M | $25M | $16M | $2.67B | $13.70B |
| Gross Margin | 58.4% | 70.3% | 54.3% | 37.6% | 61.7% |
| Operating Margin | 36.3% | 27.2% | 14.1% | 17.9% | 29.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 9.7x | 11.0x | 6.2x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $339M | $115M | $70M | $4.01B | $45.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $414M | $132M | $26M | $599M | $10.27B |
NBN vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FIS vs KO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northeast Bank (NBN) | 100 | 740.3 | +640.3% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 313.9 | +213.9% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 188.9 | +88.9% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NBN vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FIS vs KO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NBN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 34.7%, EPS growth 33.0%
- 11.4% 10Y total return vs FUNC's 361.3%
- NIM 4.4% vs MNSB's 3.1%
- 34.7% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
Among these 5 stocks, FUNC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.60 vs NBN's 1.03, lower leverage
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 4.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 0.59x
- PEG 0.26 vs KO's 2.26
- Beta 0.61, yield 4.2%, current ratio 0.59x
KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 27.8% margin vs MNSB's 11.5%
- 13.1% ROA vs MNSB's 0.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs 5.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.7% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.26 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs MNSB's 11.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs NBN's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.3% vs FIS's -49.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs MNSB's 0.7%, ROIC 15.8% vs 5.0% |
NBN vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FIS vs KO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NBN vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FIS vs KO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories
KO leads 1 • NBN leads 1 • FUNC leads 0 • MNSB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO is the larger business by revenue, generating $49.3B annually — 412.4x FUNC's $120M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%. On growth, FIS holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $355M | $120M | $135M | $11.7B | $49.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $131M | $35M | $23M | $4.1B | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $87M | $25M | $16M | $2.7B | $13.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $16M | $11M | $2.8B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.4% | +70.3% | +54.3% | +37.6% | +61.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.3% | +27.2% | +14.1% | +17.9% | +29.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +20.5% | +11.5% | +22.9% | +27.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +13.1% | +7.9% | +23.9% | +25.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +30.1% | +12.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -9.9% | +20.2% | +120.9% | +30.6% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.1x trailing earnings, FUNC trades at a 79% valuation discount to FIS's 52.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBN offers better value at 0.40x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $272M | $184M | $20.3B | $355.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $962M | $255M | $227M | $23.7B | $390.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.89x | 11.11x | 14.16x | 52.27x | 27.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.74x | 9.66x | 11.03x | 6.24x | 25.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.40x | 0.85x | — | 2.14x | 2.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.47x | 7.85x | 11.90x | 6.50x | 26.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.95x | 2.28x | 1.35x | 1.90x | 7.42x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.18x | 1.34x | 0.87x | 1.46x | 10.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.40x | 17.67x | 17.26x | 7.21x | 67.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KO's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FUNC scores 7/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.3% | +12.6% | +7.3% | +18.4% | +41.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +1.2% | +0.7% | +7.5% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.0% | +7.1% | +5.0% | +6.0% | +15.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.8% | +9.8% | +6.0% | +6.6% | +17.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 0.56x | 0.32x | 0.29x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$74M | -$17M | $43M | $3.4B | $35.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $414M | $132M | $26M | $599M | $10.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $339M | $115M | $70M | $4.0B | $45.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.91x | 0.99x | 0.31x | 21.16x | 10.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NBN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBN five years ago would be worth $44,064 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,267 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, NBN leads with a +52.3% total return vs FIS's -49.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NBN at 47.2% vs FIS's -6.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.3% | +14.3% | +26.5% | -38.9% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.3% | +44.4% | +37.2% | -49.4% | +17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +219.1% | +192.2% | +13.1% | -18.9% | +47.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +340.6% | +141.9% | +18.1% | -67.3% | +65.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1136.4% | +361.3% | +135.4% | -25.6% | +121.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.2% | +43.0% | +4.2% | -6.8% | +13.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MNSB and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBN's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNSB currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 47.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.03x | 0.67x | 0.60x | 0.61x | -0.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $135.62 | $42.35 | $25.17 | $82.74 | $84.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $80.45 | $28.00 | $17.86 | $37.91 | $65.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +98.9% | +99.0% | +47.4% | +98.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.9 | 71.6 | 65.3 | 30.8 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 123K | 13K | 45K | 5.6M | 12.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBN as "Buy", FUNC as "Buy", MNSB as "Hold", FIS as "Buy", KO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 60.4% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -40.3% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs MNSB's 1.60%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $145.00 | $25.00 | — | $62.88 | $86.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 1 | 1 | 37 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | +2.2% | +1.6% | +4.2% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 56 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $0.92 | $0.40 | $1.63 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.4% | +7.0% | +0.2% |
FIS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). KO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
NBN vs FUNC vs MNSB vs FIS vs KO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NBN or FUNC or MNSB or FIS or KO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northeast Bank (NBN) is the stronger pick with 34.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). First United Corporation (FUNC) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northeast Bank (NBN) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NBN or FUNC or MNSB or FIS or KO?
On trailing P/E, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the cheapest at 11.
1x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 52. 3x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 26x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NBN or FUNC or MNSB or FIS or KO?
Over the past 5 years, Northeast Bank (NBN) delivered a total return of +340.
6%, compared to -67. 3% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBN returned +1136% versus FIS's -25. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NBN or FUNC or MNSB or FIS or KO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Northeast Bank's 1. 03β — meaning NBN is approximately -614% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 133% for The Coca-Cola Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NBN or FUNC or MNSB or FIS or KO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northeast Bank (NBN) is pulling ahead at 34.
7% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NBN or FUNC or MNSB or FIS or KO?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBN leads at 35. 8% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FUNC leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NBN or FUNC or MNSB or FIS or KO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 26x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 19. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 60. 4% to $62. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — NBN or FUNC or MNSB or FIS or KO?
In this comparison, FIS (4.
2% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), FUNC (2. 2% yield), MNSB (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. NBN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NBN or FUNC or MNSB or FIS or KO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, NBN: +1136%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NBN and FUNC and MNSB and FIS and KO?
These companies operate in different sectors (NBN (Financial Services) and FUNC (Financial Services) and MNSB (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NBN is a small-cap high-growth stock; FUNC is a small-cap deep-value stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. FUNC, MNSB, FIS, KO pay a dividend while NBN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.