Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
NBN logo
NBN
ICE logo
ICE
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NBN vs ICE

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NBN
Northeast Bank

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.04B
5Y Perf.+640.3%
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$79.60B
5Y Perf.+53.4%

NBN vs ICE — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NBN logoNBN
ICE logoICE
IndustryBanks - RegionalFinancial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Market Cap$1.04B$79.60B
Revenue (TTM)$355M$12.64B
Net Income (TTM)$87M$3.30B
Gross Margin58.4%61.9%
Operating Margin36.3%38.7%
Forward P/E10.7x17.3x
Total Debt$339M$20.28B
Cash & Equiv.$414M$837M

NBN vs ICELong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NBN
ICE
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Northeast Bank (NBN)100740.3+640.3%
Intercontinental Ex… (ICE)100153.4+53.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NBN vs ICE

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NBN leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇NBN emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
NBN
Northeast Bank
The Banking Pick

NBN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 34.7%, EPS growth 33.0%
  • 11.4% 10Y total return vs ICE's 195.3%
  • PEG 0.34 vs ICE's 1.95
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
ICE
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
The Banking Pick

ICE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.35, yield 1.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 69.9%, current ratio 1.02x
  • Beta 0.35, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.02x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNBN logoNBN34.7% NII/revenue growth vs ICE's 7.5%
ValueNBN logoNBNLower P/E (10.7x vs 17.3x), PEG 0.34 vs 1.95
Quality / MarginsNBN logoNBNEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs ICE's 0.2% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyICE logoICEBeta 0.35 vs NBN's 1.03
DividendsICE logoICE1.4% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs NBN's 0.0%
Momentum (1Y)NBN logoNBN+52.3% vs ICE's -20.4%
Efficiency (ROA)NBN logoNBNEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs ICE's 0.2%

NBN vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
NBNNortheast Bank

Segment breakdown not available.

ICEIntercontinental Exchange, Inc.
FY 2025
Fixed Income And Data Services Segment
51.1%$1.4B
Exchanges Segment
38.8%$1.0B
Mortgage Technology Segment
10.1%$269M

NBN vs ICE — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNBNLAGGINGICE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ICE leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 35.6x NBN's $355M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 26.1% (ICE) to 24.5% (NBN).

MetricNBN logoNBNNortheast BankICE logoICEIntercontinental …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$355M$12.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$131M$6.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$87M$3.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$6M$4.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+58.4%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+36.3%+38.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+24.5%+26.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.7%+33.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-9.9%+23.1%
ICE leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NBN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.9x trailing earnings, NBN trades at a 47% valuation discount to ICE's 24.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBN offers better value at 0.40x vs ICE's 2.74x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricNBN logoNBNNortheast BankICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Market CapShares × price$1.0B$79.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$962M$99.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS12.89x24.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.74x17.34x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.40x2.74x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.47x15.34x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.95x6.30x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.18x2.77x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF19.40x18.56x
NBN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NBN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NBN delivers a 17.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $12 for ICE. NBN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs NBN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNBN logoNBNNortheast BankICE logoICEIntercontinental …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+17.3%+11.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.0%+2.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.0%+7.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+14.8%+9.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–969
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.69x0.70x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$74M$19.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$414M$837M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$339M$20.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.91x6.53x
NBN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NBN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NBN five years ago would be worth $44,064 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,085 for ICE. Over the past 12 months, NBN leads with a +52.3% total return vs ICE's -20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NBN at 47.2% vs ICE's 10.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNBN logoNBNNortheast BankICE logoICEIntercontinental …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+26.3%-11.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+52.3%-20.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+219.1%+34.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+340.6%+30.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1136.4%+195.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+47.2%+10.4%
NBN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NBN and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBN's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBN currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNBN logoNBNNortheast BankICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.03x0.35x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$135.62$189.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$80.45$136.67
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.8%+74.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.931.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded123K3.2M
Evenly matched — NBN and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

ICE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates NBN as "Buy" and ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.0% upside for ICE (target: $194) vs 11.6% for NBN (target: $145). ICE is the only dividend payer here at 1.38% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricNBN logoNBNNortheast BankICE logoICEIntercontinental …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$145.00$194.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts236
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+1.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises013
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.04$1.93
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.7%
ICE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NBN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ICE leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallNortheast Bank (NBN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NBN vs ICE: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NBN or ICE a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Northeast Bank (NBN) is the stronger pick with 34.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 5% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Northeast Bank (NBN) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northeast Bank (NBN) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NBN or ICE?

On trailing P/E, Northeast Bank (NBN) is the cheapest at 12.

9x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, Northeast Bank is actually cheaper at 10. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northeast Bank wins at 0. 34x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 1. 95x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NBN or ICE?

Over the past 5 years, Northeast Bank (NBN) delivered a total return of +340.

6%, compared to +30. 9% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBN returned +1136% versus ICE's +195. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NBN or ICE?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Northeast Bank's 1. 03β — meaning NBN is approximately 193% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northeast Bank (NBN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 69% versus 70% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NBN or ICE?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northeast Bank (NBN) is pulling ahead at 34.

7% versus 7. 5% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Northeast Bank grew EPS 33. 0% year-over-year, compared to 20. 7% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NBN or ICE?

Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 1% net margin versus 23. 8% for Northeast Bank — meaning it keeps 26. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ICE leads at 38. 7% versus 35. 8% for NBN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ICE leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NBN or ICE more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Northeast Bank (NBN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 34x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. 's 1. 95x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northeast Bank (NBN) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 17. 3x for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — 6. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 38. 0% to $194. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NBN or ICE?

In this comparison, ICE (1.

4% yield) pays a dividend. NBN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NBN or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.

(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), 1. 4% yield, +195. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +195. 3%, NBN: +1136%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NBN and ICE?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NBN is a small-cap high-growth stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ICE pays a dividend while NBN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.