NBR
Nabors Industries Ltd.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Market Cap$1.54B
5Y Perf.+160.4%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
NBR vs KRP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$1.37B
5Y Perf.+111.7%
NBR vs KRP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | NBR | KRP |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Drilling | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $1.54B | $1.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.18B | $309M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $263M | $72M |
| Gross Margin | 25.0% | 103.3% |
| Operating Margin | 13.8% | 37.2% |
| Forward P/E | 5.6x | 15.8x |
| Total Debt | $2.57B | $451M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $941M | $44M |
NBR vs KRP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
NBR
KRP
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nabors Industries L… (NBR) | 100 | 260.4 | +160.4% |
| Kimbell Royalty Par… (KRP) | 100 | 211.7 | +111.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NBR vs KRP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: KRP leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Nabors Industries Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NBR
Nabors Industries Ltd.
The Growth Play
NBR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth 176.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.3%
- 8.7% revenue growth vs KRP's 7.5%
- Lower P/E (5.6x vs 15.8x)
Best for: growth exposure
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP
The Income Pick
KRP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 9.8%
- 35.4% 10Y total return vs NBR's -67.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, Low D/E 58.3%, current ratio 8.64x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NBR | 8.7% revenue growth vs KRP's 7.5% |
| Value | NBR | Lower P/E (5.6x vs 15.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | KRP | 23.2% margin vs NBR's 8.3% |
| Stability / Safety | KRP | Beta 0.21 vs NBR's 1.53, lower leverage |
| Dividends | KRP | 9.8% yield, vs NBR's 0.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | NBR | +273.7% vs KRP's +35.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | KRP | 5.8% ROA vs NBR's 5.3%, ROIC 8.8% vs 6.2% |
NBR vs KRP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
NBR vs KRP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLKRPLAGGINGNBR
NBRNabors Industries Ltd.
1leads
KRPKimbell Royalty Partn…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs NBRMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
KRP4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
NBR4/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
KRP7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
KRP4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
KRP2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 10.3x KRP's $309M. KRP is the more profitable business, keeping 23.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NBR's 8.3%. On growth, NBR holds the edge at +9.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | NBRNabors Industries… | KRPKimbell Royalty P… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $309M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $177M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $263M | $72M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$23M | $241M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | +103.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +37.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.3% | +23.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +78.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | -27.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +102.5% | -76.2% |
KRP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
NBR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, NBR trades at a 82% valuation discount to KRP's 31.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NBR's 3.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KRP's 13.4x.
| Metric | NBRNabors Industries… | KRPKimbell Royalty P… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.62x | 31.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.47x | 13.37x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.48x | 4.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 2.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.59x |
NBR leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KRP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBR delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $10 for KRP. KRP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.58x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NBR's 1.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBR scores 7/9 vs KRP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | NBRNabors Industries… | KRPKimbell Royalty P… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.8% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.3% | +5.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +8.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.8% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.78x | 0.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $407M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $941M | $44M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.6B | $451M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.07x | 5.04x |
KRP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KRP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KRP five years ago would be worth $18,155 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,746 for NBR. Over the past 12 months, NBR leads with a +273.7% total return vs KRP's +35.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KRP at 7.3% vs NBR's 0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NBRNabors Industries… | KRPKimbell Royalty P… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +74.2% | +23.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +273.7% | +35.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.6% | +23.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.5% | +81.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.0% | +35.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.2% | +7.3% |
KRP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KRP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KRP is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBR's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | NBRNabors Industries… | KRPKimbell Royalty P… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.53x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $105.80 | $15.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $23.27 | $11.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.2% | +92.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.3 | 46.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 348K | 829K |
KRP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBR and KRP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NBR as "Hold" and KRP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.1% upside for KRP (target: $17) vs -16.1% for NBR (target: $81). For income investors, KRP offers the higher dividend yield at 9.80% vs NBR's 0.43%.
| Metric | NBRNabors Industries… | KRPKimbell Royalty P… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $81.00 | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.4% | +9.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.42 | $1.42 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +13.1% |
Evenly matched — NBR and KRP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
KRP leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NBR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallKimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
NBR vs KRP: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NBR or KRP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nabors Industries Ltd.
(NBR) is the stronger pick with 8. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 5% for Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP). Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NBR or KRP?
On trailing P/E, Nabors Industries Ltd.
(NBR) is the cheapest at 5. 6x versus Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP at 31. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NBR or KRP?
Over the past 5 years, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) delivered a total return of +81.
5%, compared to -2. 5% for Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRP returned +35. 4% versus NBR's -67. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NBR or KRP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
21β versus Nabors Industries Ltd. 's 1. 53β — meaning NBR is approximately 641% more volatile than KRP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 58% versus 178% for Nabors Industries Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NBR or KRP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nabors Industries Ltd.
(NBR) is pulling ahead at 8. 7% versus 7. 5% for Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Nabors Industries Ltd. grew EPS 176. 7% year-over-year, compared to 100. 6% for Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP. Over a 3-year CAGR, NBR leads at 6. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NBR or KRP?
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
2% net margin versus 7. 8% for Nabors Industries Ltd. — meaning it keeps 27. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRP leads at 39. 8% versus 8. 3% for NBR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRP leads at 93. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NBR or KRP more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KRP: 17.
1% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NBR or KRP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) offers the highest yield at 9. 8%, versus 0. 4% for Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR).
09Is NBR or KRP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
21), 9. 8% yield). Nabors Industries Ltd. (NBR) carries a higher beta of 1. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KRP: +35. 4%, NBR: -67. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NBR and KRP?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NBR is a small-cap deep-value stock; KRP is a small-cap income-oriented stock. KRP pays a dividend while NBR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(NBR: 9.3% · KRP: -27.4%)Net Margin>
%
(NBR: 8.3% · KRP: 23.2%)P/E Ratio<
x
(NBR: 5.6x · KRP: 31.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.