Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NBTB vs TRMK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
NBTB vs TRMK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.33B | $2.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $867M | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $169M | $224M |
| Gross Margin | 72.1% | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | 25.3% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $327M | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $185M | $668M |
NBTB vs TRMK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 142.7 | +42.7% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.1 | +88.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NBTB vs TRMK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
TRMK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 34.8%, EPS growth 1.9%
- 127.7% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 103.4%
- PEG 1.42 vs NBTB's 1.52
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs NBTB's 10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 11.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs TRMK's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs TRMK's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.7% vs NBTB's +7.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
NBTB vs TRMK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NBTB vs TRMK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMK and NBTB operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $867M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 20.0% (TRMK) to 19.5% (NBTB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $867M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $241M | $323M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $169M | $224M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $225M | $230M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.1% | +71.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +20.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +39.5% | +5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 10% valuation discount to NBTB's 13.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.50x vs NBTB's 1.91x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.5B | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.42x | 12.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.71x | 11.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.91x | 1.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.27x | 9.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.69x | 2.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.66x | 11.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRMK delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $10 for NBTB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRMK's 0.53x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.9% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.4% | +3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $142M | $448M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $185M | $668M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $327M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.05x | 0.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRMK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRMK five years ago would be worth $14,841 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,139 for NBTB. Over the past 12 months, TRMK leads with a +31.7% total return vs NBTB's +7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRMK at 28.2% vs NBTB's 15.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.3% | +15.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.1% | +31.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +53.6% | +110.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.4% | +48.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.4% | +127.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.4% | +28.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and TRMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NBTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRMK's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.89x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.92 | $45.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $39.20 | $33.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.2% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 51.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 232K | 396K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NBTB as "Hold" and TRMK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.9% upside for NBTB (target: $46) vs 1.7% for TRMK (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.19% vs TRMK's 2.16%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $46.00 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.43 | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +3.0% |
NBTB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TRMK leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
NBTB vs TRMK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NBTB or TRMK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NBTB or TRMK?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. at 13. 4x. On forward P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Trustmark Corporation wins at 1. 42x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 52x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NBTB or TRMK?
Over the past 5 years, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) delivered a total return of +48.
4%, compared to +31. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMK returned +127. 7% versus NBTB's +103. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NBTB or TRMK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Trustmark Corporation's 0. 94β — meaning TRMK is approximately 6% more volatile than NBTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 53% for Trustmark Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NBTB or TRMK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NBT Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to 1. 9% for Trustmark Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NBTB or TRMK?
Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
0% net margin versus 19. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMK leads at 25. 5% versus 25. 3% for NBTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NBTB or TRMK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 42x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 52x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for Trustmark Corporation — 0. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NBTB: 2. 9% to $46. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NBTB or TRMK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 2. 2% for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK).
09Is NBTB or TRMK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +103. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +103. 4%, TRMK: +127. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NBTB and TRMK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.