Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NBTX vs SENS vs NVCR vs MDT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Devices
NBTX vs SENS vs NVCR vs MDT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Devices | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $2.06B | $224M | $1.92B | $99.94B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $48M | $42M | $674M | $35.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-85M | $-88M | $-173M | $4.61B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 52.0% | 75.2% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | -143.9% | -204.4% | -27.2% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $51M | $41M | $290M | $28.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $50M | $41M | $103M | $2.22B |
NBTX vs SENS vs NVCR vs MDT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nanobiotix S.A. (NBTX) | 100 | 275.7 | +175.7% |
| Senseonics Holdings… (SENS) | 100 | 28.8 | -71.2% |
| NovoCure Limited (NVCR) | 100 | 10.3 | -89.7% |
| Medtronic plc (MDT) | 100 | 65.0 | -35.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NBTX vs SENS vs NVCR vs MDT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NBTX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 150.9% 10Y total return vs MDT's 26.5%
- +11.9% vs SENS's -61.2%
SENS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 56.9%, EPS growth 33.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.1%
- 56.9% revenue growth vs NBTX's -132.1%
NVCR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MDT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 36 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 59.1%, current ratio 1.85x
- Beta 0.47, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.85x
- 13.0% margin vs SENS's -208.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.9% revenue growth vs NBTX's -132.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.0% margin vs SENS's -208.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.47 vs NVCR's 2.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield; 36-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +11.9% vs SENS's -61.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 175.8% ROA vs NBTX's -188.4% |
NBTX vs SENS vs NVCR vs MDT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NBTX vs SENS vs NVCR vs MDT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MDT leads in 1 of 6 categories
NBTX leads 1 • SENS leads 0 • NVCR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTX and MDT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MDT is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.5B annually — 837.7x SENS's $42M. MDT is the more profitable business, keeping 13.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SENS's -2.1%. On growth, NBTX holds the edge at +186.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $48M | $42M | $674M | $35.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$67M | -$84M | -$165M | $9.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$85M | -$88M | -$173M | $4.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$33M | -$81M | -$48M | $5.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +52.0% | +75.2% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -143.9% | -2.0% | -27.2% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -177.5% | -2.1% | -25.7% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -69.2% | -190.6% | -7.1% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +186.8% | +87.2% | +12.3% | +8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +76.1% | -77.5% | -100.0% | -11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NBTX and NVCR and MDT each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $224M | $1.9B | $99.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $225M | $2.1B | $126.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.18x | -3.23x | -13.80x | 21.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 14.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 36.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 14.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 6.35x | 2.92x | 2.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.66x | 5.51x | 2.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 19.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MDT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MDT delivers a 9.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-131 for SENS. MDT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVCR's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SENS scores 6/9 vs NBTX's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -131.5% | -50.8% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -188.4% | -67.9% | -16.5% | +175.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -3.2% | -16.4% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.6% | -83.6% | -28.9% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.68x | 0.85x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $822,000 | $187M | $26.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $50M | $41M | $103M | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $51M | $41M | $290M | $28.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.83x | -4.38x | -96.80x | 9.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NBTX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTX five years ago would be worth $28,294 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for NVCR. Over the past 12 months, NBTX leads with a +1191.2% total return vs SENS's -61.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NBTX at 99.6% vs NVCR's -37.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +92.5% | -9.0% | +28.3% | -18.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1191.2% | -61.2% | +1.1% | -2.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +695.0% | -60.1% | -75.7% | -4.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +182.9% | -85.8% | -91.3% | -27.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +150.9% | -91.5% | +30.3% | +26.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +99.6% | -26.4% | -37.6% | -1.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTX and MDT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MDT is the less volatile stock with a 0.47 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVCR's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTX currently trades 95.8% from its 52-week high vs SENS's 35.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.09x | 2.06x | 2.15x | 0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $44.46 | $14.96 | $20.06 | $106.33 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.26 | $4.79 | $9.82 | $77.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +35.8% | +83.9% | +73.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.2 | 34.5 | 69.8 | 27.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 75K | 625K | 1.5M | 7.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NBTX as "Buy", SENS as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", MDT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs -34.3% for NBTX (target: $28). MDT is the only dividend payer here at 3.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.00 | $9.00 | $33.50 | $109.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 16 | 15 | 49 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 36 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $2.78 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% |
MDT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). NBTX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
NBTX vs SENS vs NVCR vs MDT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NBTX or SENS or NVCR or MDT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Senseonics Holdings, Inc.
(SENS) is the stronger pick with 56. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -132. 1% for Nanobiotix S. A. (NBTX). Medtronic plc (MDT) offers the better valuation at 21. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nanobiotix S. A. (NBTX) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NBTX or SENS or NVCR or MDT?
Over the past 5 years, Nanobiotix S.
A. (NBTX) delivered a total return of +182. 9%, compared to -91. 3% for NovoCure Limited (NVCR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTX returned +167. 9% versus SENS's -92. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NBTX or SENS or NVCR or MDT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medtronic plc (MDT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
42β versus NovoCure Limited's 2. 15β — meaning NVCR is approximately 406% more volatile than MDT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Medtronic plc (MDT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 85% for NovoCure Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NBTX or SENS or NVCR or MDT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Senseonics Holdings, Inc.
(SENS) is pulling ahead at 56. 9% versus -132. 1% for Nanobiotix S. A. (NBTX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Senseonics Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 33. 6% year-over-year, compared to -33. 3% for Nanobiotix S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SENS leads at 29. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NBTX or SENS or NVCR or MDT?
Nanobiotix S.
A. (NBTX) is the more profitable company, earning 586. 9% net margin versus -196. 0% for Senseonics Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 586. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTX leads at 589. 1% versus -193. 8% for SENS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NBTX or SENS or NVCR or MDT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99.
0% to $33. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — NBTX or SENS or NVCR or MDT?
In this comparison, MDT (3.
6% yield) pays a dividend. NBTX, SENS, NVCR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is NBTX or SENS or NVCR or MDT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medtronic plc (MDT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
42), 3. 6% yield). Senseonics Holdings, Inc. (SENS) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MDT: +24. 3%, SENS: -92. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NBTX and SENS and NVCR and MDT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NBTX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SENS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MDT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. MDT pays a dividend while NBTX, SENS, NVCR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.