Coal
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NC vs ARLP vs METC vs NRP vs SXC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Coal
Coal
Coal
Coal
NC vs ARLP vs METC vs NRP vs SXC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Coal | Coal | Coal | Coal | Coal |
| Market Cap | $393M | $3.29B | $735M | $1.50B | $621M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $274M | $2.17B | $537M | $185M | $1.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $246M | $-51M | $95M | $-66M |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | 23.9% | 2.5% | 69.9% | 6.5% |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | 14.4% | -10.4% | 67.0% | 2.1% |
| Forward P/E | 1.8x | 11.2x | — | 23.9x | 20.1x |
| Total Debt | $111M | $480M | $18M | $33M | $686M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $50M | $71M | $440M | $30M | $89M |
NC vs ARLP vs METC vs NRP vs SXC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NACCO Industries, I… (NC) | 100 | 200.5 | +100.5% |
| Alliance Resource P… (ARLP) | 100 | 806.0 | +706.0% |
| Ramaco Resources, I… (METC) | 100 | 545.0 | +445.0% |
| Natural Resource Pa… (NRP) | 100 | 779.5 | +679.5% |
| SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) | 100 | 214.7 | +114.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NC vs ARLP vs METC vs NRP vs SXC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.6%, EPS growth -48.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.7%
- 16.6% revenue growth vs METC's -19.5%
- Lower P/E (1.8x vs 20.1x)
- +60.5% vs SXC's -10.9%
ARLP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 10.3%
- Beta 0.07, yield 10.3%, current ratio 2.10x
- 10.3% yield, vs NC's 1.9%
METC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NRP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 9.7% 10Y total return vs ARLP's 195.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.01, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 1.85x
- 51.6% margin vs METC's -9.6%
- Beta 0.01 vs METC's 1.07
Among these 5 stocks, SXC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.6% revenue growth vs METC's -19.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.8x vs 20.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 51.6% margin vs METC's -9.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs METC's 1.07 | |
| Dividends | 10.3% yield, vs NC's 1.9% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.5% vs SXC's -10.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs METC's -4.5%, ROIC 16.1% vs -17.0% |
NC vs ARLP vs METC vs NRP vs SXC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NC vs ARLP vs METC vs NRP vs SXC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NRP leads in 3 of 6 categories
NC leads 0 • ARLP leads 0 • METC leads 0 • SXC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NRP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARLP is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 11.8x NRP's $185M. NRP is the more profitable business, keeping 51.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to METC's -9.6%. On growth, SXC holds the edge at +4.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $274M | $2.2B | $537M | $185M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $23M | $626M | $13M | $142M | $208M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | $246M | -$51M | $95M | -$66M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $339M | -$67M | $164M | $77M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +23.9% | +2.5% | +69.9% | +6.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +14.4% | -10.4% | +67.0% | +2.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +11.3% | -9.6% | +51.6% | -3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.3% | +15.6% | -12.5% | +89.1% | +4.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.3% | -4.5% | -25.1% | -29.3% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +74.6% | -87.7% | -5.1% | -100.0% | -125.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NC and ARLP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, ARLP trades at a 53% valuation discount to NC's 22.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ARLP's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than METC's 25.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $393M | $3.3B | $735M | $1.5B | $621M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $454M | $3.7B | $312M | $1.5B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.42x | 10.56x | -14.34x | 11.26x | -14.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1.81x | 11.17x | — | 23.94x | 20.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 9.86x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.40x | 25.60x | 9.72x | 5.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.42x | 1.50x | 1.37x | 7.40x | 0.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.92x | 1.76x | 1.52x | 2.37x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.48x | — | 9.03x | 14.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NRP leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NRP delivers a 15.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-11 for METC. METC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SXC's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NC scores 6/9 vs SXC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.0% | +13.5% | -10.6% | +15.4% | -9.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +8.6% | -4.5% | +12.6% | -3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.4% | +12.9% | -17.0% | +16.1% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.9% | +14.5% | -7.1% | +19.1% | +4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | 0.26x | 0.04x | 0.05x | 1.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $62M | $409M | -$423M | $3M | $597M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $50M | $71M | $440M | $30M | $89M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $111M | $480M | $18M | $33M | $686M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.34x | 7.19x | -7.17x | 23.35x | 1.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NRP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NRP five years ago would be worth $73,134 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,984 for SXC. Over the past 12 months, NC leads with a +60.5% total return vs SXC's -10.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRP at 36.3% vs SXC's 3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.6% | +12.3% | -21.1% | +9.5% | +1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.5% | +3.9% | +52.5% | +17.8% | -10.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.1% | +72.4% | +57.4% | +153.3% | +10.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +131.0% | +519.0% | +306.1% | +631.3% | +19.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +370.1% | +195.5% | +21.4% | +971.6% | +68.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.5% | +19.9% | +16.3% | +36.3% | +3.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NC and NRP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NRP is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than METC's 1.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NC currently trades 88.7% from its 52-week high vs METC's 25.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.07x | 1.07x | 0.01x | 0.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $59.42 | $29.45 | $57.80 | $128.60 | $9.07 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.80 | $22.20 | $8.21 | $91.79 | $5.52 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.7% | +86.8% | +25.6% | +87.9% | +80.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.0 | 44.2 | 58.3 | 39.9 | 69.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 380K | 1.8M | 33K | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NC and ARLP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NC as "Buy", ARLP as "Hold", METC as "Buy", NRP as "Hold", SXC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.0% upside for METC (target: $21) vs 17.4% for ARLP (target: $30). For income investors, ARLP offers the higher dividend yield at 10.28% vs METC's 0.59%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $30.00 | $20.83 | — | $9.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 18 | 9 | 10 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +10.3% | +0.6% | +3.8% | +6.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.98 | $2.63 | $0.09 | $4.25 | $0.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NRP leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
NC vs ARLP vs METC vs NRP vs SXC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NC or ARLP or METC or NRP or SXC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NACCO Industries, Inc.
(NC) is the stronger pick with 16. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 5% for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. (ARLP) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NACCO Industries, Inc. (NC) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NC or ARLP or METC or NRP or SXC?
On trailing P/E, Alliance Resource Partners, L.
P. (ARLP) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus NACCO Industries, Inc. at 22. 4x. On forward P/E, NACCO Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NC or ARLP or METC or NRP or SXC?
Over the past 5 years, Natural Resource Partners L.
P. (NRP) delivered a total return of +631. 3%, compared to +19. 8% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NRP returned +971. 6% versus METC's +21. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NC or ARLP or METC or NRP or SXC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Natural Resource Partners L.
P. (NRP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Ramaco Resources, Inc. 's 1. 07β — meaning METC is approximately 11535% more volatile than NRP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 109% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NC or ARLP or METC or NRP or SXC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NACCO Industries, Inc.
(NC) is pulling ahead at 16. 6% versus -19. 5% for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Natural Resource Partners L. P. grew EPS -11. 5% year-over-year, compared to -590. 5% for Ramaco Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NC leads at 4. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NC or ARLP or METC or NRP or SXC?
Natural Resource Partners L.
P. (NRP) is the more profitable company, earning 66. 0% net margin versus -9. 6% for Ramaco Resources, Inc. — meaning it keeps 66. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NRP leads at 68. 9% versus -14. 5% for NC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NRP leads at 81. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NC or ARLP or METC or NRP or SXC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NACCO Industries, Inc.
(NC) trades at 1. 8x forward P/E versus 23. 9x for Natural Resource Partners L. P. — 22. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for METC: 41. 0% to $20. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — NC or ARLP or METC or NRP or SXC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Alliance Resource Partners, L. P. (ARLP) offers the highest yield at 10. 3%, versus 0. 6% for Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC).
09Is NC or ARLP or METC or NRP or SXC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Natural Resource Partners L.
P. (NRP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 3. 8% yield, +971. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NRP: +971. 6%, METC: +21. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NC and ARLP and METC and NRP and SXC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NC is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARLP is a small-cap deep-value stock; METC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NRP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SXC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.