Coal
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SXC vs HCC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Coal
SXC vs HCC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Coal | Coal |
| Market Cap | $621M | $4.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.86B | $1.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-66M | $138M |
| Gross Margin | 6.5% | 38.2% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 9.7% |
| Forward P/E | 20.1x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $686M | $271M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $89M | $300M |
SXC vs HCC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) | 100 | 214.7 | +114.7% |
| Warrior Met Coal, I… (HCC) | 100 | 623.4 | +523.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SXC vs HCC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SXC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 6.6%
- Rev growth -5.1%, EPS growth -146.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.3%
- -5.1% revenue growth vs HCC's -14.1%
HCC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 12.0% 10Y total return vs SXC's 68.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 12.7%, current ratio 3.19x
- Beta 0.57, yield 0.4%, current ratio 3.19x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -5.1% revenue growth vs HCC's -14.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 20.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs SXC's -3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs SXC's 0.91, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.6% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HCC's 0.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +92.2% vs SXC's -10.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.0% ROA vs SXC's -3.7%, ROIC 1.8% vs 4.3% |
SXC vs HCC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SXC vs HCC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SXC and HCC operate at a comparable scale, with $1.9B and $1.5B in trailing revenue. HCC is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SXC's -3.5%. On growth, HCC holds the edge at +53.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $208M | $289M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$66M | $138M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $77M | -$135M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | +38.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +9.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +9.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | -9.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.4% | +53.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -125.7% | +9.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SXC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SXC's 5.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HCC's 19.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $621M | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.08x | 81.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.05x | 11.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.54x | 19.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 3.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.00x | 2.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.68x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCC delivers a 6.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-10 for SXC. HCC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SXC's 1.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCC scores 3/9 vs SXC's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.9% | +6.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.7% | +5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.09x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $597M | -$29M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $89M | $300M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $686M | $271M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.18x | 14.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HCC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HCC five years ago would be worth $56,921 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,984 for SXC. Over the past 12 months, HCC leads with a +92.2% total return vs SXC's -10.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCC at 32.4% vs SXC's 3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.5% | -1.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.9% | +92.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.9% | +132.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.8% | +469.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.0% | +1201.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.5% | +32.4% |
Risk & Volatility
HCC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HCC is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SXC's 0.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.91x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.07 | $105.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.52 | $40.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +80.7% | +83.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.3 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 848K |
Analyst Outlook
SXC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SXC as "Buy" and HCC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.2% upside for HCC (target: $113) vs 23.0% for SXC (target: $9). For income investors, SXC offers the higher dividend yield at 6.61% vs HCC's 0.39%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.00 | $112.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.6% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.48 | $0.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% |
HCC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SXC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
SXC vs HCC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SXC or HCC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SunCoke Energy, Inc.
(SXC) is the stronger pick with -5. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 1% for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) offers the better valuation at 81. 3x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SXC or HCC?
On forward P/E, Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 11. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SXC or HCC?
Over the past 5 years, Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
(HCC) delivered a total return of +469. 2%, compared to +19. 8% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCC returned +1202% versus SXC's +68. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SXC or HCC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
(HCC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus SunCoke Energy, Inc. 's 0. 91β — meaning SXC is approximately 59% more volatile than HCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 109% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SXC or HCC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SunCoke Energy, Inc.
(SXC) is pulling ahead at -5. 1% versus -14. 1% for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Warrior Met Coal, Inc. grew EPS -77. 5% year-over-year, compared to -146. 4% for SunCoke Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SXC leads at -2. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SXC or HCC?
Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
(HCC) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 4% net margin versus -2. 4% for SunCoke Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SXC leads at 3. 5% versus 3. 5% for HCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HCC leads at 8. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SXC or HCC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
(HCC) trades at 11. 4x forward P/E versus 20. 1x for SunCoke Energy, Inc. — 8. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HCC: 28. 2% to $112. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SXC or HCC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SunCoke Energy, Inc. (SXC) offers the highest yield at 6. 6%, versus 0. 4% for Warrior Met Coal, Inc. (HCC).
09Is SXC or HCC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Warrior Met Coal, Inc.
(HCC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), +1202% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HCC: +1202%, SXC: +68. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SXC and HCC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SXC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SXC pays a dividend while HCC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.