Apparel - Manufacturers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NCI vs GIII
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Manufacturers
NCI vs GIII — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Manufacturers | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $23M | $1.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $236M | $2.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $67M |
| Gross Margin | 21.0% | 38.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | 5.3% |
| Forward P/E | 21.9x | 11.0x |
| Total Debt | $70M | $12M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $407M |
NCI vs GIII — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neo-Concept Interna… (NCI) | 100 | 17.6 | -82.4% |
| G-III Apparel Group… (GIII) | 100 | 112.9 | +12.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NCI vs GIII
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NCI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta -1.10
- Rev growth 35.3%, EPS growth 81.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.7%
- 35.3% revenue growth vs GIII's -7.0%
GIII is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -25.9% 10Y total return vs NCI's -97.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 0.7%
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 21.9x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.3% revenue growth vs GIII's -7.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 21.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.4% margin vs GIII's 2.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (0.7% vs 122.5%) | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.5% vs NCI's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs GIII's 2.6%, ROIC 10.6% vs 7.5% |
NCI vs GIII — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NCI vs GIII — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GIII leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GIII is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 12.5x NCI's $236M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.4% (NCI) to 2.3% (GIII).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $236M | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $186M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $67M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +38.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +5.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.0% | +1.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -8.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -169.7% |
Valuation Metrics
GIII leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.0x trailing earnings, GIII trades at a 4% valuation discount to NCI's 21.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GIII's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NCI's 13.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $23M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30M | $945M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.92x | 21.04x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.55x | 5.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 0.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.13x | 0.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NCI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NCI delivers a 29.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $4 for GIII. GIII carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NCI's 1.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NCI scores 6/9 vs GIII's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +29.6% | +3.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.1% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.8% | +6.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.22x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $60M | -$395M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $407M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $70M | $12M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.08x | 275.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GIII leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GIII five years ago would be worth $9,738 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $236 for NCI. Over the past 12 months, GIII leads with a +19.5% total return vs NCI's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GIII at 25.4% vs NCI's -71.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.8% | +8.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -35.3% | +19.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | +97.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.6% | -2.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.1% | -25.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.3% | +25.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NCI and GIII each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NCI is the less volatile stock with a -1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GIII's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GIII currently trades 91.2% from its 52-week high vs NCI's 8.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -1.10x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.81 | $34.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.32 | $20.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.1% | +91.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.0 | 56.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.3M | 519K |
Analyst Outlook
NCI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $33.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
GIII leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NCI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
NCI vs GIII: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NCI or GIII a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI) is the stronger pick with 35.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII). G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII) offers the better valuation at 21. 0x trailing P/E (11. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NCI or GIII?
On trailing P/E, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
(GIII) is the cheapest at 21. 0x versus Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited at 21. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NCI or GIII?
Over the past 5 years, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.
(GIII) delivered a total return of -2. 6%, compared to -97. 6% for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GIII returned -25. 9% versus NCI's -97. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NCI or GIII?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI) is the lower-risk stock at -1.
10β versus G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. 's 1. 10β — meaning GIII is approximately -201% more volatile than NCI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 122% for Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NCI or GIII?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI) is pulling ahead at 35.
3% versus -7. 0% for G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. (GIII). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited grew EPS 81. 8% year-over-year, compared to -64. 0% for G-III Apparel Group, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NCI leads at -0. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NCI or GIII?
Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI) is the more profitable company, earning 3.
4% net margin versus 2. 3% for G-III Apparel Group, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 3. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GIII leads at 5. 3% versus 4. 9% for NCI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GIII leads at 39. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — NCI or GIII?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is NCI or GIII better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.
10)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NCI: -97. 1%, GIII: -25. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NCI and GIII?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NCI is a small-cap high-growth stock; GIII is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.