Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NCL vs TILE vs MHK vs LX vs TREX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Financial - Credit Services
Construction
NCL vs TILE vs MHK vs LX vs TREX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Financial - Credit Services | Construction |
| Market Cap | $4M | $1.59B | $6.29B | $147M | $4.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $13M | $1.39B | $10.99B | $14.20B | $1.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $116M | $414M | $1.61B | $191M |
| Gross Margin | -15.8% | 38.7% | 24.3% | 35.4% | 39.2% |
| Operating Margin | -114.7% | 11.8% | 4.9% | 16.1% | 22.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.1x | 11.2x | 0.3x | 24.0x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $265M | $2.76B | $5.27B | $229M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $245K | $71M | $856M | $2.25B | $4M |
NCL vs TILE vs MHK vs LX vs TREX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northann Corp. (NCL) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Interface, Inc. (TILE) | 100 | 309.9 | +209.9% |
| Mohawk Industries, … (MHK) | 100 | 127.8 | +27.8% |
| LexinFintech Holdin… (LX) | 100 | 112.6 | +12.6% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 69.7 | -30.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NCL vs TILE vs MHK vs LX vs TREX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NCL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 51.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -23.7%
- 9.9% revenue growth vs MHK's -0.5%
- Beta 0.57 vs TREX's 1.47
TILE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 74.9% 10Y total return vs TREX's 239.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 21.9%, current ratio 2.34x
- Beta 1.00, yield 0.2%, current ratio 2.34x
- +39.1% vs NCL's -95.6%
Among these 5 stocks, MHK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 6.9%
- Lower P/E (0.3x vs 24.0x)
- 6.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs TILE's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
TREX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 16.3% margin vs NCL's -135.6%
- 12.3% ROA vs NCL's -117.9%, ROIC 16.4% vs -16.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% revenue growth vs MHK's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 24.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.3% margin vs NCL's -135.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs TREX's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | 6.9% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs TILE's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.1% vs NCL's -95.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.3% ROA vs NCL's -117.9%, ROIC 16.4% vs -16.4% |
NCL vs TILE vs MHK vs LX vs TREX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NCL vs TILE vs MHK vs LX vs TREX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TREX leads in 2 of 6 categories
LX leads 2 • TILE leads 1 • NCL leads 0 • MHK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TREX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LX is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.2B annually — 1092.8x NCL's $13M. TREX is the more profitable business, keeping 16.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NCL's -135.6%. On growth, NCL holds the edge at +38.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $13M | $1.4B | $11.0B | $14.2B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$14M | $206M | $1.2B | $1.8B | $309M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | $116M | $414M | $1.6B | $191M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $122M | $709M | $0 | $263M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | +38.7% | +24.3% | +35.4% | +39.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -114.7% | +11.8% | +4.9% | +16.1% | +22.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -135.6% | +8.4% | +3.8% | +7.7% | +16.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -49.2% | +8.8% | +6.5% | +5.9% | +22.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.6% | +4.3% | +8.0% | — | +1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.4% | +10.8% | +65.2% | +110.3% | +3.6% |
Valuation Metrics
LX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.2x trailing earnings, LX trades at a 90% valuation discount to TREX's 22.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LX's 1.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TREX's 13.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4M | $1.6B | $6.3B | $147M | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $1.8B | $8.2B | $590M | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.86x | 14.06x | 17.33x | 2.16x | 22.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.10x | 11.23x | 0.35x | 23.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 6.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.68x | 7.05x | 1.65x | 13.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 1.15x | 0.58x | 0.07x | 3.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.47x | 1.35x | 0.77x | 0.22x | 4.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.10x | 10.20x | 1.20x | 30.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TREX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TREX delivers a 18.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NCL. TILE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NCL's 2.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LX scores 8/9 vs TREX's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.6% | +9.6% | +5.0% | +14.7% | +18.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -117.9% | +6.6% | +3.0% | +7.2% | +12.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -16.4% | +11.3% | +3.9% | +11.0% | +16.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -67.4% | +13.2% | +4.8% | +19.5% | +23.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.56x | 0.22x | 0.33x | 0.49x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $193M | $1.9B | $3.0B | $225M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $245,164 | $71M | $856M | $2.3B | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $265M | $2.8B | $5.3B | $229M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -72.01x | 8.00x | 36.90x | 153.26x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TILE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TILE five years ago would be worth $19,935 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $40 for NCL. Over the past 12 months, TILE leads with a +39.1% total return vs NCL's -95.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TILE at 57.3% vs NCL's -84.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.5% | -3.0% | -6.2% | -31.8% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -95.6% | +39.1% | +1.9% | -70.4% | -30.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +289.2% | +2.9% | +8.1% | -30.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +99.4% | -55.3% | -66.4% | -64.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.6% | +74.9% | -47.6% | -74.1% | +239.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -84.2% | +57.3% | +0.9% | +2.6% | -11.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NCL and TILE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NCL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TREX's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TILE currently trades 78.5% from its 52-week high vs NCL's 1.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.57x | 1.00x | 1.34x | 1.25x | 1.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.16 | $35.11 | $143.13 | $9.35 | $68.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.10 | $18.74 | $93.60 | $2.02 | $29.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.2% | +78.5% | +71.8% | +22.0% | +56.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.8 | 53.5 | 50.6 | 44.7 | 51.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 272K | 572K | 1.1M | 1.5M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
LX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TILE as "Buy", MHK as "Hold", LX as "Buy", TREX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 69.9% upside for LX (target: $4) vs 13.6% for TREX (target: $45). For income investors, LX offers the higher dividend yield at 6.91% vs TILE's 0.22%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $36.00 | $130.00 | $3.50 | $44.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 32 | 12 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | — | +6.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.06 | — | $0.97 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | +2.4% | 0.0% | +1.3% |
TREX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LX leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
NCL vs TILE vs MHK vs LX vs TREX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NCL or TILE or MHK or LX or TREX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northann Corp.
(NCL) is the stronger pick with 9. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) offers the better valuation at 2. 2x trailing P/E (0. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Interface, Inc. (TILE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NCL or TILE or MHK or LX or TREX?
On trailing P/E, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
(LX) is the cheapest at 2. 2x versus Trex Company, Inc. at 22. 0x. On forward P/E, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. is actually cheaper at 0. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NCL or TILE or MHK or LX or TREX?
Over the past 5 years, Interface, Inc.
(TILE) delivered a total return of +99. 4%, compared to -99. 6% for Northann Corp. (NCL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TREX returned +239. 9% versus NCL's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NCL or TILE or MHK or LX or TREX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northann Corp.
(NCL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning TREX is approximately 160% more volatile than NCL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Interface, Inc. (TILE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 3% for Northann Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NCL or TILE or MHK or LX or TREX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northann Corp.
(NCL) is pulling ahead at 9. 9% versus -0. 5% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Northann Corp. grew EPS 51. 4% year-over-year, compared to -27. 1% for Mohawk Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TILE leads at 2. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NCL or TILE or MHK or LX or TREX?
Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus -28. 5% for Northann Corp. — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TREX leads at 22. 0% versus -10. 9% for NCL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TREX leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NCL or TILE or MHK or LX or TREX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
(LX) trades at 0. 3x forward P/E versus 24. 0x for Trex Company, Inc. — 23. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LX: 69. 9% to $3. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — NCL or TILE or MHK or LX or TREX?
In this comparison, LX (6.
9% yield), TILE (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. NCL, MHK, TREX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NCL or TILE or MHK or LX or TREX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Northann Corp.
(NCL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NCL: -99. 6%, MHK: -47. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NCL and TILE and MHK and LX and TREX?
These companies operate in different sectors (NCL (Consumer Cyclical) and TILE (Consumer Cyclical) and MHK (Consumer Cyclical) and LX (Financial Services) and TREX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NCL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TILE is a small-cap deep-value stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock; LX is a small-cap deep-value stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LX pays a dividend while NCL, TILE, MHK, TREX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.