Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NEGG vs EBAY vs PRTS vs FLXS vs EVLV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Specialty Retail
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Security & Protection Services
NEGG vs EBAY vs PRTS vs FLXS vs EVLV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Security & Protection Services |
| Market Cap | $612M | $48.63B | $59M | $295M | $1.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.31B | $11.60B | $548M | $458M | $146M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $2.04B | $-50M | $22M | $-33M |
| Gross Margin | 11.3% | 72.0% | 32.8% | 23.2% | 51.6% |
| Operating Margin | -2.2% | 19.6% | -8.9% | 6.1% | -33.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 17.4x | — | 11.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $73M | $7.38B | $25M | $59M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $100M | $1.87B | $26M | $40M | $49M |
NEGG vs EBAY vs PRTS vs FLXS vs EVLV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Newegg Commerce, In… (NEGG) | 100 | 45.6 | -54.4% |
| eBay Inc. (EBAY) | 100 | 204.3 | +104.3% |
| CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) | 100 | 7.8 | -92.2% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 229.8 | +129.8% |
| Evolv Technologies … (EVLV) | 100 | 73.2 | -26.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NEGG vs EBAY vs PRTS vs FLXS vs EVLV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NEGG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +7.0% vs PRTS's +3.4%
EBAY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 1.1%
- 369.5% 10Y total return vs FLXS's 51.4%
- 17.6% margin vs EVLV's -22.7%
- Beta 0.73 vs NEGG's 3.14
Among these 5 stocks, PRTS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FLXS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 1.51, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.78x
- Better valuation composite
EVLV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 40.5%, EPS growth 41.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 40.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, Low D/E 35.4%, current ratio 1.23x
- 40.5% revenue growth vs NEGG's -17.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.5% revenue growth vs NEGG's -17.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs EVLV's -22.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs NEGG's 3.14 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs FLXS's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.0% vs PRTS's +3.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs PRTS's -25.5%, ROIC 16.8% vs -51.3% |
NEGG vs EBAY vs PRTS vs FLXS vs EVLV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NEGG vs EBAY vs PRTS vs FLXS vs EVLV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EBAY leads in 3 of 6 categories
FLXS leads 1 • NEGG leads 0 • PRTS leads 0 • EVLV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EBAY is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 79.5x EVLV's $146M. EBAY is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EVLV's -22.7%. On growth, EVLV holds the edge at +32.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $11.6B | $548M | $458M | $146M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$20M | $2.6B | -$33M | $31M | -$24M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | $2.0B | -$50M | $22M | -$33M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $1.7B | -$52M | $28M | -$20M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.3% | +72.0% | +32.8% | +23.2% | +51.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +19.6% | -8.9% | +6.1% | -33.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +17.6% | -9.2% | +4.8% | -22.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +14.5% | -9.4% | +6.1% | -14.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.5% | +19.5% | -9.8% | +9.8% | +32.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.8% | +5.7% | +55.2% | -27.2% | +158.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FLXS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, FLXS trades at a 37% valuation discount to EBAY's 24.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FLXS's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EBAY's 21.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $612M | $48.6B | $59M | $295M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $586M | $54.1B | $59M | $314M | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -12.98x | 24.52x | -1.03x | 15.54x | -35.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 17.40x | — | 11.90x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.03x | — | 10.38x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.50x | 4.38x | 0.11x | 0.67x | 8.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.31x | 10.61x | 0.97x | 1.87x | 10.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.28x | — | 8.74x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EBAY delivers a 44.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-80 for PRTS. FLXS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.35x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EBAY's 1.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs EVLV's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.5% | +44.1% | -79.8% | +12.2% | -30.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.8% | +11.5% | -25.5% | +7.5% | -11.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.3% | +16.8% | -51.3% | +9.9% | -30.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.2% | +17.4% | -43.7% | +12.3% | -25.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.69x | 1.60x | 0.47x | 0.35x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$27M | $5.5B | -$660,000 | $19M | -$7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $100M | $1.9B | $26M | $40M | $49M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $73M | $7.4B | $25M | $59M | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -45.86x | 10.52x | -49.49x | 380.21x | -29.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — EBAY and FLXS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EBAY five years ago would be worth $18,633 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $564 for PRTS. Over the past 12 months, NEGG leads with a +695.9% total return vs PRTS's +3.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs PRTS's -43.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -44.1% | +22.6% | +69.5% | +38.7% | +6.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +695.9% | +54.2% | +3.4% | +80.1% | +76.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.8% | +137.4% | -81.6% | +242.4% | +78.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.4% | +86.3% | -94.4% | +19.5% | -27.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +369.5% | -73.7% | +51.4% | -26.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.9% | +33.4% | -43.1% | +50.7% | +21.4% |
Risk & Volatility
EBAY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EBAY is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NEGG's 3.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EBAY currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs NEGG's 21.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.14x | 0.73x | 1.28x | 1.51x | 1.23x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $137.84 | $111.38 | $1.36 | $59.95 | $8.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.50 | $67.87 | $0.39 | $29.38 | $4.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +21.2% | +95.5% | +62.3% | +92.0% | +80.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.1 | 63.1 | 55.3 | 60.4 | 66.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 5.4M | 662K | 47K | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EBAY and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NEGG as "Buy", EBAY as "Hold", EVLV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.2% upside for EVLV (target: $10) vs -73.5% for NEGG (target: $8). For income investors, FLXS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.14% vs EBAY's 1.08%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.75 | $109.67 | — | $54.00 | $10.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 68 | — | — | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | — | +1.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 7 | 0 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.15 | — | $0.63 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +5.1% | 0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
EBAY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLXS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NEGG vs EBAY vs PRTS vs FLXS vs EVLV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NEGG or EBAY or PRTS or FLXS or EVLV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.
(EVLV) is the stronger pick with 40. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 5% for Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NEGG or EBAY or PRTS or FLXS or EVLV?
On trailing P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus eBay Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NEGG or EBAY or PRTS or FLXS or EVLV?
Over the past 5 years, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) delivered a total return of +86. 3%, compared to -94. 4% for CarParts. com, Inc. (PRTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EBAY returned +369. 5% versus NEGG's -89. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NEGG or EBAY or PRTS or FLXS or EVLV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Newegg Commerce, Inc. 's 3. 14β — meaning NEGG is approximately 328% more volatile than EBAY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 35% versus 160% for eBay Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NEGG or EBAY or PRTS or FLXS or EVLV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc.
(EVLV) is pulling ahead at 40. 5% versus -17. 5% for Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -15. 5% for CarParts. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVLV leads at 40. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NEGG or EBAY or PRTS or FLXS or EVLV?
eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 3% net margin versus -22. 7% for Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EBAY leads at 20. 5% versus -30. 7% for EVLV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EBAY leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NEGG or EBAY or PRTS or FLXS or EVLV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 17. 4x for eBay Inc. — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVLV: 40. 2% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NEGG or EBAY or PRTS or FLXS or EVLV?
In this comparison, FLXS (1.
1% yield), EBAY (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. NEGG, PRTS, EVLV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NEGG or EBAY or PRTS or FLXS or EVLV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, eBay Inc.
(EBAY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +369. 5% 10Y return). Newegg Commerce, Inc. (NEGG) carries a higher beta of 3. 14 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (EBAY: +369. 5%, NEGG: -89. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NEGG and EBAY and PRTS and FLXS and EVLV?
These companies operate in different sectors (NEGG (Consumer Cyclical) and EBAY (Consumer Cyclical) and PRTS (Consumer Cyclical) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and EVLV (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NEGG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EBAY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PRTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; EVLV is a small-cap high-growth stock. EBAY, FLXS pay a dividend while NEGG, PRTS, EVLV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.