NEN vs ELME

For growth investors, New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN) is the stronger pick with 10.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN) offers the better valuation at 34. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Elme Communities (ELME) a "Hold" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN) delivered a total return of +26.

2%, compared to -12. 5% for Elme Communities (ELME). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEN returned +49. 2% versus ELME's -10. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

14β versus Elme Communities's 0. 47β — meaning ELME is approximately 240% more volatile than NEN relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN) is pulling ahead at 10.

8% versus -100. 0% for Elme Communities (ELME). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership grew EPS -61. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1066. 7% for Elme Communities. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN) is the more profitable company, earning 6.

8% net margin versus 0. 0% for Elme Communities — meaning it keeps 6. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEN leads at 24. 4% versus 0. 0% for ELME. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEN leads at 16. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Elme Communities (ELME) offers the highest yield at 33. 5%, versus 8. 0% for New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN).

For long-horizon retirement investors, New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

14), 8. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEN: +49. 2%, ELME: -10. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.