Real Estate - Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NEN vs IRT vs AIV vs MAA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
NEN vs IRT vs AIV vs MAA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Services | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $210M | $3.86B | $604M | $15.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $89M | $662M | $193M | $2.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $48M | $554M | $403M |
| Gross Margin | 49.1% | 20.2% | 55.2% | 23.9% |
| Operating Margin | 24.4% | 17.5% | 66.3% | 27.4% |
| Forward P/E | 34.8x | 99.9x | 1.1x | 39.0x |
| Total Debt | $528M | $2.28B | $0.00 | $5.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $18M | $48M | $395M | $60M |
NEN vs IRT vs AIV vs MAA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| New England Realty … (NEN) | 100 | 119.6 | +19.6% |
| Independence Realty… (IRT) | 100 | 165.5 | +65.5% |
| Apartment Investmen… (AIV) | 100 | 87.8 | -12.2% |
| Mid-America Apartme… (MAA) | 100 | 112.0 | +12.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NEN vs IRT vs AIV vs MAA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 8.0%
- Rev growth 10.8%, EPS growth -61.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, current ratio 4.71x
- PEG 1.01 vs MAA's 3.38
IRT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 191.8% 10Y total return vs AIV's 85.0%
AIV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 287.7% margin vs NEN's 6.8%
- 68.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MAA's 4.6%
- -1.4% vs NEN's -20.3%
- 29.6% ROA vs IRT's 0.8%, ROIC 4.2% vs 1.6%
MAA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.8% FFO/revenue growth vs AIV's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (34.8x vs 39.0x), PEG 1.01 vs 3.38 | |
| Quality / Margins | 287.7% margin vs NEN's 6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs AIV's 0.69 | |
| Dividends | 68.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MAA's 4.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.4% vs NEN's -20.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 29.6% ROA vs IRT's 0.8%, ROIC 4.2% vs 1.6% |
NEN vs IRT vs AIV vs MAA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NEN vs IRT vs AIV vs MAA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AIV leads in 2 of 6 categories
NEN leads 1 • IRT leads 1 • MAA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AIV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAA is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.2B annually — 24.8x NEN's $89M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.9% (AIV) to 6.8% (NEN). On growth, NEN holds the edge at +15.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $89M | $662M | $193M | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $45M | $365M | $186M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $48M | $554M | $403M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $27M | $139M | -$230M | $596M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.1% | +20.2% | +55.2% | +23.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.4% | +17.5% | +66.3% | +27.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +7.3% | +2.9% | +18.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.7% | +21.1% | -119.5% | +26.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.7% | +2.5% | -3.4% | +0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -133.3% | -101.4% | +25.9% | -31.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NEN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.1x trailing earnings, AIV trades at a 98% valuation discount to IRT's 68.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NEN offers better value at 1.01x vs MAA's 2.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $210M | $3.9B | $604M | $15.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $720M | $6.1B | $209M | $20.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.85x | 68.21x | 1.11x | 34.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 99.88x | — | 39.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.01x | — | — | 2.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.03x | 16.71x | 2.09x | 16.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.35x | 5.87x | — | 6.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.07x | 1.17x | 2.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.01x | 26.33x | — | 21.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AIV leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AIV delivers a 162.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $163 in annual profit, vs $1 for IRT. IRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.64x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAA's 0.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IRT scores 6/9 vs AIV's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +1.3% | +162.9% | +6.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +0.8% | +29.6% | +3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | +1.6% | +4.2% | +4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.9% | +2.4% | +2.3% | +5.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.64x | — | 0.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $510M | $2.2B | -$395M | $5.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $18M | $48M | $395M | $60M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $528M | $2.3B | $0 | $5.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.32x | 1.73x | 0.70x | 3.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NEN five years ago would be worth $12,656 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,042 for MAA. Over the past 12 months, AIV leads with a -1.4% total return vs NEN's -20.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IRT at 2.4% vs MAA's -0.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.4% | -6.0% | -2.4% | -4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.3% | -11.9% | -1.4% | -17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.0% | +7.4% | +5.1% | -2.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +26.6% | +17.8% | +23.5% | +0.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.5% | +191.8% | +85.0% | +71.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.0% | +2.4% | +1.7% | -0.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NEN and IRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIV's 0.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IRT currently trades 83.5% from its 52-week high vs AIV's 48.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.14x | 0.48x | 0.69x | 0.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $79.85 | $19.61 | $8.87 | $166.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $56.00 | $14.60 | $3.94 | $120.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.1% | +83.5% | +48.6% | +78.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.2 | 62.4 | 50.1 | 59.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1K | 2.2M | 2.9M | 858K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AIV and MAA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IRT as "Buy", AIV as "Hold", MAA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 132.0% upside for AIV (target: $10) vs 10.2% for MAA (target: $144). For income investors, AIV offers the higher dividend yield at 68.35% vs IRT's 4.02%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.08 | $10.00 | $143.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 | 3 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.0% | +4.0% | +68.4% | +4.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 4 | 1 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.80 | $0.66 | $2.95 | $6.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +0.8% | +0.0% | +0.2% |
AIV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
NEN vs IRT vs AIV vs MAA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NEN or IRT or AIV or MAA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN) is the stronger pick with 10.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV). Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) offers the better valuation at 1. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NEN or IRT or AIV or MAA?
On trailing P/E, Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) is the cheapest at 1.
1x versus Independence Realty Trust, Inc. at 68. 2x. On forward P/E, Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. is actually cheaper at 39. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NEN or IRT or AIV or MAA?
Over the past 5 years, New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN) delivered a total return of +26.
6%, compared to +0. 4% for Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. (MAA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRT returned +191. 8% versus NEN's +46. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NEN or IRT or AIV or MAA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
14β versus Apartment Investment and Management Company's 0. 69β — meaning AIV is approximately 399% more volatile than NEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 64% versus 93% for Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NEN or IRT or AIV or MAA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN) is pulling ahead at 10.
8% versus -100. 0% for Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Apartment Investment and Management Company grew EPS 623. 0% year-over-year, compared to -61. 4% for New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEN leads at 9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NEN or IRT or AIV or MAA?
Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) is the more profitable company, earning 287.
7% net margin versus 6. 8% for New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership — meaning it keeps 287. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AIV leads at 66. 3% versus 18. 4% for IRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIV leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NEN or IRT or AIV or MAA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
(MAA) trades at 39. 0x forward P/E versus 99. 9x for Independence Realty Trust, Inc. — 60. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AIV: 132. 0% to $10. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NEN or IRT or AIV or MAA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Apartment Investment and Management Company (AIV) offers the highest yield at 68. 4%, versus 4. 0% for Independence Realty Trust, Inc. (IRT).
09Is NEN or IRT or AIV or MAA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
14), 8. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEN: +46. 5%, AIV: +85. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NEN and IRT and AIV and MAA?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NEN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; AIV is a small-cap deep-value stock; MAA is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.