Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NEON vs SYNA vs ALGM vs AMBA vs QCOM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
NEON vs SYNA vs ALGM vs AMBA vs QCOM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $28M | $4.89B | $9.07B | $3.28B | $230.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $1.17B | $840M | $374M | $44.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $-48M | $-13M | $-80M | $9.92B |
| Gross Margin | 98.7% | 43.6% | 45.0% | 59.8% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | -391.5% | -6.4% | -0.0% | -23.6% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 3.3x | 28.1x | 92.1x | 98.0x | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $371K | $880M | $368M | $5M | $16.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $392M | $121M | $145M | $7.84B |
NEON vs SYNA vs ALGM vs AMBA vs QCOM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neonode Inc. (NEON) | 100 | 20.2 | -79.8% |
| Synaptics Incorpora… (SYNA) | 100 | 163.6 | +63.6% |
| Allegro MicroSystem… (ALGM) | 100 | 267.5 | +167.5% |
| Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) | 100 | 139.6 | +39.6% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 177.6 | +77.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NEON vs SYNA vs ALGM vs AMBA vs QCOM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NEON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 1.5%, current ratio 12.05x
- Beta 0.89, current ratio 12.05x
- Lower P/E (3.3x vs 98.0x)
- 411.9% margin vs AMBA's -21.3%
Among these 5 stocks, SYNA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ALGM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +132.3% vs NEON's -84.7%
AMBA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 25.8%, EPS growth 33.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.0%
- 25.8% revenue growth vs NEON's -33.7%
QCOM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.64, yield 1.6%
- 382.4% 10Y total return vs ALGM's 176.6%
- 1.6% yield; 23-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.8% revenue growth vs NEON's -33.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.3x vs 98.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 411.9% margin vs AMBA's -21.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs AMBA's 2.53 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; 23-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +132.3% vs NEON's -84.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 37.0% ROA vs AMBA's -10.6%, ROIC -46.0% vs -22.5% |
NEON vs SYNA vs ALGM vs AMBA vs QCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NEON vs SYNA vs ALGM vs AMBA vs QCOM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
QCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories
NEON leads 0 • SYNA leads 0 • ALGM leads 0 • AMBA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NEON and QCOM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $44.5B annually — 21574.7x NEON's $2M. NEON is the more profitable business, keeping 4.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMBA's -21.3%. On growth, AMBA holds the edge at +31.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $1.2B | $840M | $374M | $44.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | $50M | $66M | -$72M | $12.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | -$48M | -$13M | -$80M | $9.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $97M | $121M | $76M | $12.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +98.7% | +43.6% | +45.0% | +59.8% | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.9% | -6.4% | -0.0% | -23.6% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | -4.1% | -1.6% | -21.3% | +22.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.0% | +8.3% | +14.4% | +20.3% | +28.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.6% | +10.4% | +28.9% | +31.2% | -3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -25.9% | +62.5% | +2.2% | +39.7% | +173.0% |
Valuation Metrics
QCOM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.3x trailing earnings, NEON trades at a 92% valuation discount to QCOM's 43.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, QCOM's 17.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALGM's 208.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $28M | $4.9B | $9.1B | $3.3B | $230.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3M | $5.4B | $9.3B | $3.1B | $239.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 3.29x | -102.81x | -125.51x | -26.87x | 43.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 28.08x | 92.13x | 98.00x | 20.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 21.03x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 109.78x | 208.44x | — | 17.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 13.67x | 4.55x | 12.51x | 11.53x | 5.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 3.53x | 9.87x | 5.61x | 11.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 46.05x | 413.06x | 140.04x | 18.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NEON delivers a 43.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $43 in annual profit, vs $-13 for AMBA. AMBA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QCOM's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMBA scores 6/9 vs ALGM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +43.2% | -3.5% | -1.4% | -13.5% | +40.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +37.0% | -1.9% | -0.9% | -10.6% | +18.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -46.0% | -4.0% | -1.3% | -22.5% | +29.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -38.9% | -3.9% | -1.5% | -22.2% | +28.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.63x | 0.40x | 0.01x | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$25M | $489M | $247M | -$139M | $8.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $392M | $121M | $145M | $7.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $371,000 | $880M | $368M | $5M | $16.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -36.35x | -0.24x | — | 17.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ALGM and QCOM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALGM five years ago would be worth $20,447 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,105 for NEON. Over the past 12 months, ALGM leads with a +132.3% total return vs NEON's -84.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QCOM at 28.4% vs NEON's -38.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.7% | +65.6% | +81.9% | +1.5% | +27.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -84.7% | +109.8% | +132.3% | +44.4% | +53.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.8% | +63.2% | +30.1% | +13.8% | +111.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.9% | +2.1% | +104.5% | -12.4% | +82.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.8% | +90.8% | +176.6% | +99.4% | +382.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.5% | +17.7% | +9.2% | +4.4% | +28.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NEON and SYNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEON is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMBA's 2.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SYNA currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs NEON's 5.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.89x | 2.34x | 2.39x | 2.53x | 1.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.90 | $129.78 | $51.40 | $96.69 | $228.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.27 | $57.54 | $19.75 | $48.30 | $121.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.6% | +96.6% | +95.2% | +78.9% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.0 | 73.7 | 65.1 | 74.7 | 82.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 102K | 774K | 1.9M | 866K | 15.6M |
Analyst Outlook
QCOM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SYNA as "Buy", ALGM as "Buy", AMBA as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.9% upside for AMBA (target: $98) vs -15.3% for QCOM (target: $186). QCOM is the only dividend payer here at 1.57% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $114.50 | $52.57 | $98.33 | $185.56 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 | 13 | 36 | 69 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 1 | — | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $3.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.6% | +9.4% | 0.0% | +3.8% |
QCOM leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
NEON vs SYNA vs ALGM vs AMBA vs QCOM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NEON or SYNA or ALGM or AMBA or QCOM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ambarella, Inc.
(AMBA) is the stronger pick with 25. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -33. 7% for Neonode Inc. (NEON). Neonode Inc. (NEON) offers the better valuation at 3. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NEON or SYNA or ALGM or AMBA or QCOM?
On trailing P/E, Neonode Inc.
(NEON) is the cheapest at 3. 3x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated at 43. 7x. On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 20. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NEON or SYNA or ALGM or AMBA or QCOM?
Over the past 5 years, Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.
(ALGM) delivered a total return of +104. 5%, compared to -78. 9% for Neonode Inc. (NEON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: QCOM returned +382. 4% versus NEON's -91. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NEON or SYNA or ALGM or AMBA or QCOM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Neonode Inc.
(NEON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Ambarella, Inc. 's 2. 53β — meaning AMBA is approximately 183% more volatile than NEON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 77% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NEON or SYNA or ALGM or AMBA or QCOM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ambarella, Inc.
(AMBA) is pulling ahead at 25. 8% versus -33. 7% for Neonode Inc. (NEON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Neonode Inc. grew EPS 224. 4% year-over-year, compared to -150. 0% for Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QCOM leads at 0. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NEON or SYNA or ALGM or AMBA or QCOM?
Neonode Inc.
(NEON) is the more profitable company, earning 411. 9% net margin versus -41. 1% for Ambarella, Inc. — meaning it keeps 411. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QCOM leads at 27. 9% versus -391. 5% for NEON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEON leads at 98. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NEON or SYNA or ALGM or AMBA or QCOM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 20.
4x forward P/E versus 98. 0x for Ambarella, Inc. — 77. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMBA: 28. 9% to $98. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — NEON or SYNA or ALGM or AMBA or QCOM?
In this comparison, QCOM (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. NEON, SYNA, ALGM, AMBA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NEON or SYNA or ALGM or AMBA or QCOM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
6% yield, +382. 4% 10Y return). Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA) carries a higher beta of 2. 34 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QCOM: +382. 4%, SYNA: +90. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NEON and SYNA and ALGM and AMBA and QCOM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NEON is a small-cap deep-value stock; SYNA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMBA is a small-cap high-growth stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. QCOM pays a dividend while NEON, SYNA, ALGM, AMBA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.