Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NEPH vs NX vs CNMD vs APOG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Medical - Devices
Construction
NEPH vs NX vs CNMD vs APOG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Construction | Medical - Devices | Construction |
| Market Cap | $38M | $925M | $1.13B | $788M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $1.85B | $1.37B | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $776K | $-240M | $55M | $54M |
| Gross Margin | 59.2% | 26.1% | 53.6% | 22.7% |
| Operating Margin | 3.5% | -10.0% | 11.3% | 6.7% |
| Forward P/E | 32.0x | 10.1x | 8.4x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $854M | $835M | $286M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $76M | $41M | $40M |
NEPH vs NX vs CNMD vs APOG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nephros, Inc. (NEPH) | 100 | 45.1 | -54.9% |
| Quanex Building Pro… (NX) | 100 | 163.3 | +63.3% |
| CONMED Corporation (CNMD) | 100 | 50.1 | -49.9% |
| Apogee Enterprises,… (APOG) | 100 | 177.5 | +77.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NEPH vs NX vs CNMD vs APOG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NEPH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 32.7%, EPS growth -10.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 10.4%, current ratio 4.06x
- Beta 0.58, current ratio 4.06x
- 4.1% margin vs NX's -13.0%
NX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 24.7% 10Y total return vs APOG's 10.6%
- 43.8% revenue growth vs APOG's 3.2%
CNMD is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.23 vs APOG's 0.32
- Lower P/E (8.4x vs 10.7x), PEG 0.23 vs 0.32
APOG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 2.8%
- 2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs NX's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.8% revenue growth vs APOG's 3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 10.7x), PEG 0.23 vs 0.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.1% margin vs NX's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.58 vs NX's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs NX's 1.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.9% vs CNMD's -35.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.9% ROA vs NX's -11.7%, ROIC 14.2% vs -8.8% |
NEPH vs NX vs CNMD vs APOG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NEPH vs NX vs CNMD vs APOG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NEPH leads in 3 of 6 categories
CNMD leads 1 • APOG leads 1 • NX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEPH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NX is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 96.6x NEPH's $19M. NEPH is the more profitable business, keeping 4.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NX's -13.0%. On growth, NEPH holds the edge at +6.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $1.8B | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $806,000 | -$81M | $219M | $57M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $776,000 | -$240M | $55M | $54M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$348,000 | $95M | $124M | $95M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.2% | +26.1% | +53.6% | +22.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | -10.0% | +11.3% | +6.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | -13.0% | +4.0% | +3.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.8% | +5.1% | +9.0% | +6.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.9% | +2.3% | -0.7% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -81.0% | +71.9% | +136.8% | +6.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CNMD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, APOG trades at a 55% valuation discount to NEPH's 32.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), APOG offers better value at 0.43x vs CNMD's 0.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38M | $925M | $1.1B | $788M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $34M | $1.7B | $1.9B | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 32.00x | -3.73x | 24.34x | 14.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.09x | 8.41x | 10.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.67x | 0.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.34x | — | 9.96x | 21.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.03x | 0.50x | 0.82x | 0.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.78x | 1.29x | 1.11x | 1.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.23x | 9.05x | 7.51x | 8.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NEPH leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
APOG delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-30 for NX. NEPH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NX's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), APOG scores 7/9 vs NX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.7% | -30.2% | +5.4% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.9% | -11.7% | +2.4% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.2% | -8.8% | +5.8% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.2% | -10.4% | +7.0% | +9.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 1.18x | 0.81x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $778M | $794M | $247M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $76M | $41M | $40M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $854M | $835M | $286M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 588.00x | -3.30x | 5.20x | 5.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NEPH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in APOG five years ago would be worth $11,105 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,818 for CNMD. Over the past 12 months, NEPH leads with a +76.9% total return vs CNMD's -35.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NEPH at 33.2% vs CNMD's -31.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.9% | +32.3% | -9.3% | -1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +76.9% | +18.6% | -35.7% | -6.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +136.2% | +6.9% | -68.4% | +0.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.4% | -23.4% | -71.8% | +11.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.7% | +24.7% | +3.5% | +10.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.2% | +2.3% | -31.9% | +0.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NEPH and NX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEPH is the less volatile stock with a 0.58 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NX's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NX currently trades 88.1% from its 52-week high vs NEPH's 54.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.58x | 1.83x | 1.32x | 1.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.42 | $22.98 | $61.08 | $49.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.88 | $11.04 | $33.21 | $30.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.8% | +88.1% | +60.2% | +73.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.6 | 54.2 | 53.1 | 54.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 35K | 454K | 403K | 252K |
Analyst Outlook
APOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NX as "Hold", CNMD as "Hold", APOG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 112.2% upside for CNMD (target: $78) vs 92.4% for APOG (target: $71). For income investors, APOG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.83% vs NX's 1.59%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $78.00 | $70.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 21 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% | +2.2% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 2 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.32 | $0.79 | $1.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% | 0.0% | +1.9% |
NEPH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CNMD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NEPH vs NX vs CNMD vs APOG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NEPH or NX or CNMD or APOG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is the stronger pick with 43.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 2% for Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG). Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NEPH or NX or CNMD or APOG?
On trailing P/E, Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
(APOG) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Nephros, Inc. at 32. 0x. On forward P/E, CONMED Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CONMED Corporation wins at 0. 23x versus Apogee Enterprises, Inc. 's 0. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NEPH or NX or CNMD or APOG?
Over the past 5 years, Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
(APOG) delivered a total return of +11. 1%, compared to -71. 8% for CONMED Corporation (CNMD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NX returned +24. 7% versus CNMD's +3. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NEPH or NX or CNMD or APOG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nephros, Inc.
(NEPH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 58β versus Quanex Building Products Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning NX is approximately 218% more volatile than NEPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nephros, Inc. (NEPH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 118% for Quanex Building Products Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NEPH or NX or CNMD or APOG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is pulling ahead at 43.
8% versus 3. 2% for Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Apogee Enterprises, Inc. grew EPS -35. 2% year-over-year, compared to -703. 3% for Quanex Building Products Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NEPH leads at 23. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NEPH or NX or CNMD or APOG?
Nephros, Inc.
(NEPH) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 4% net margin versus -13. 6% for Quanex Building Products Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CNMD leads at 10. 3% versus -10. 6% for NX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEPH leads at 61. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NEPH or NX or CNMD or APOG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, CONMED Corporation (CNMD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus Apogee Enterprises, Inc. 's 0. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, CONMED Corporation (CNMD) trades at 8. 4x forward P/E versus 10. 7x for Apogee Enterprises, Inc. — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CNMD: 112. 2% to $78. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NEPH or NX or CNMD or APOG?
In this comparison, APOG (2.
8% yield), CNMD (2. 2% yield), NX (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. NEPH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NEPH or NX or CNMD or APOG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nephros, Inc.
(NEPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 58)). Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEPH: +11. 7%, NX: +24. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NEPH and NX and CNMD and APOG?
These companies operate in different sectors (NEPH (Healthcare) and NX (Industrials) and CNMD (Healthcare) and APOG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NEPH is a small-cap high-growth stock; NX is a small-cap high-growth stock; CNMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; APOG is a small-cap deep-value stock. NX, CNMD, APOG pay a dividend while NEPH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.