Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NESR vs NINE vs PTEN vs ACDC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NESR
National Energy Services Reunited Corp.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.24B
5Y Perf.+213.0%
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$427M
5Y Perf.+214.7%
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.

Oil & Gas Drilling

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.33B
5Y Perf.-40.2%
ACDC
ProFrac Holding Corp.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.19B
5Y Perf.-63.9%

NESR vs NINE vs PTEN vs ACDC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NESR logoNESR
NINE logoNINE
PTEN logoPTEN
ACDC logoACDC
IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas DrillingOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$2.24B$427M$4.33B$1.19B
Revenue (TTM)$1.27B$571M$4.66B$1.94B
Net Income (TTM)$70M$-41M$-119M$-367M
Gross Margin13.9%11.5%8.8%3.7%
Operating Margin8.8%2.0%-1.6%-8.5%
Forward P/E15.3x
Total Debt$409M$383M$1.28B$1.14B
Cash & Equiv.$108M$18M$421M$23M

NESR vs NINE vs PTEN vs ACDCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NESR
NINE
PTEN
ACDC
StockMay 22May 26Return
National Energy Ser… (NESR)100313.0+213.0%
Nine Energy Service… (NINE)100314.7+214.7%
Patterson-UTI Energ… (PTEN)10059.8-40.2%
ProFrac Holding Cor… (ACDC)10036.1-63.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NESR vs NINE vs PTEN vs ACDC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NESR and PTEN are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. NINE also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NESR
National Energy Services Reunited Corp.
The Income Pick

NESR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.18
  • Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 5.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.1%
  • 145.5% 10Y total return vs NINE's -62.3%
  • 13.6% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

NINE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +15.1% vs ACDC's +55.9%
Best for: momentum
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

PTEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.59, Low D/E 39.7%, current ratio 1.64x
  • Beta 0.59, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.64x
  • Better valuation composite
  • Beta 0.59 vs NINE's 3.21
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
ACDC
ProFrac Holding Corp.
The Secondary Option

ACDC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: energy exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNESR logoNESR13.6% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
ValuePTEN logoPTENBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsNESR logoNESR5.5% margin vs ACDC's -18.9%
Stability / SafetyPTEN logoPTENBeta 0.59 vs NINE's 3.21
DividendsPTEN logoPTEN2.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NINE logoNINE+15.1% vs ACDC's +55.9%
Efficiency (ROA)NESR logoNESR3.9% ROA vs ACDC's -13.1%, ROIC 8.4% vs -4.6%

NESR vs NINE vs PTEN vs ACDC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NESRNational Energy Services Reunited Corp.
FY 2024
Production Services
67.5%$878M
Drilling and Evaluation Services
32.5%$424M
NINENine Energy Service, Inc.
FY 2025
Service Revenue
38.4%$431M
Cement
18.8%$211M
Tool Revenue
11.6%$131M
Tools
11.6%$131M
Wireline
10.3%$116M
Coiled Tubing
9.3%$104M
PTENPatterson-UTI Energy, Inc.
FY 2025
Completion Services
59.9%$2.9B
Drilling Services
32.3%$1.6B
Drilling Products
7.1%$344M
Other
0.7%$33M
ACDCProFrac Holding Corp.
FY 2025
Service
87.2%$1.7B
Product
12.8%$249M

NESR vs NINE vs PTEN vs ACDC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNESRLAGGINGACDC

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NESR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

PTEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 8.2x NINE's $571M. NESR is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACDC's -18.9%. On growth, ACDC holds the edge at -4.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNESR logoNESRNational Energy S…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PTEN logoPTENPatterson-UTI Ene…ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.3B$571M$4.7B$1.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$257M$61M$851M$251M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$70M-$41M-$119M-$367M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$46M-$7M$273M$20M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+13.9%+11.5%+8.8%+3.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.8%+2.0%-1.6%-8.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.5%-7.2%-2.6%-18.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.6%-1.2%+5.9%+1.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-12.2%-4.4%-12.7%-4.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-18.2%-34.6%-33.3%
NESR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

PTEN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, PTEN's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.0x.

MetricNESR logoNESRNational Energy S…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PTEN logoPTENPatterson-UTI Ene…ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…
Market CapShares × price$2.2B$427M$4.3B$1.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.5B$791M$5.2B$2.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS29.19x-7.88x-47.54x-2.86x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.31x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.39x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.07x337.01x5.67x8.19x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.72x0.90x0.61x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.46x1.36x1.20x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.05x11.64x60.74x
PTEN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NESR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

NESR delivers a 7.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-38 for ACDC. PTEN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.40x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACDC's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NESR scores 8/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNESR logoNESRNational Energy S…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PTEN logoPTENPatterson-UTI Ene…ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.3%-3.7%-38.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.9%-11.5%-2.2%-13.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.4%+0.7%-0.4%-4.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.9%+0.9%-0.5%-6.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–98153
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.45x0.40x1.30x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$301M$364M$860M$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$108M$18M$421M$23M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$409M$383M$1.3B$1.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.17x0.24x-0.96x-1.22x
NESR leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — NESR and NINE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $48,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,633 for ACDC. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1505.8% total return vs ACDC's +55.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NESR at 94.0% vs ACDC's -13.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNESR logoNESRNational Energy S…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PTEN logoPTENPatterson-UTI Ene…ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+47.9%+2682.5%+77.9%+62.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+286.0%+1505.8%+111.0%+55.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+629.7%+150.0%+17.3%-35.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+72.6%+385.2%+48.7%-63.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+145.5%-62.3%-22.1%-63.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+94.0%+35.7%+5.5%-13.6%
Evenly matched — NESR and NINE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NINE and PTEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

PTEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.59 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs ACDC's 61.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNESR logoNESRNational Energy S…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PTEN logoPTENPatterson-UTI Ene…ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.18x3.21x0.59x0.83x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$26.85$10.23$12.62$10.70
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.47$0.00$5.10$3.08
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.0%+96.3%+90.4%+61.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10058.882.955.455.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.1M125K10.6M1.5M
Evenly matched — NINE and PTEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: NESR as "Buy", NINE as "Hold", PTEN as "Buy", ACDC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -8.8% for ACDC (target: $6). PTEN is the only dividend payer here at 2.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricNESR logoNESRNational Energy S…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PTEN logoPTENPatterson-UTI Ene…ACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$26.80$18.00$11.00$6.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts69536
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises111
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.32
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.6%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

NESR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PTEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallNational Energy Services Re… (NESR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NESR vs NINE vs PTEN vs ACDC: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NESR or NINE or PTEN or ACDC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, National Energy Services Reunited Corp.

(NESR) is the stronger pick with 13. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). National Energy Services Reunited Corp. (NESR) offers the better valuation at 29. 2x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate National Energy Services Reunited Corp. (NESR) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — NESR or NINE or PTEN or ACDC?

Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.

(NINE) delivered a total return of +385. 2%, compared to -63. 7% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NESR returned +145. 5% versus ACDC's -63. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — NESR or NINE or PTEN or ACDC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.

(PTEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 59β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning NINE is approximately 442% more volatile than PTEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 40% versus 130% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — NESR or NINE or PTEN or ACDC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), National Energy Services Reunited Corp.

(NESR) is pulling ahead at 13. 6% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: National Energy Services Reunited Corp. grew EPS 515. 4% year-over-year, compared to -66. 7% for ProFrac Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTEN leads at 22. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — NESR or NINE or PTEN or ACDC?

National Energy Services Reunited Corp.

(NESR) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus -19. 0% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NESR leads at 10. 6% versus -6. 9% for ACDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NESR leads at 16. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is NESR or NINE or PTEN or ACDC more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 82.

7% to $18. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — NESR or NINE or PTEN or ACDC?

In this comparison, PTEN (2.

8% yield) pays a dividend. NESR, NINE, ACDC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is NESR or NINE or PTEN or ACDC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.

(PTEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 59), 2. 8% yield). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTEN: -22. 1%, NINE: -62. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between NESR and NINE and PTEN and ACDC?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

PTEN pays a dividend while NESR, NINE, ACDC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

NESR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NINE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PTEN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACDC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NESR and NINE and PTEN and ACDC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NESR: -12.2% · NINE: -4.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.