NEWP vs PAAS vs AG vs EXK vs MFG

For growth investors, First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) is the stronger pick with 128. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (0. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate New Pacific Metals Corp. (NEWP) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

(MFG) is the cheapest at 19. 3x versus First Majestic Silver Corp. at 61. 1x. On forward P/E, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. wins at 0. 01x versus First Majestic Silver Corp. 's 0. 78x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.

(MFG) delivered a total return of +209. 1%, compared to +14. 9% for New Pacific Metals Corp. (NEWP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEWP returned +22. 2% versus AG's +128. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Endeavour Silver Corp. 's 1. 71β — meaning EXK is approximately 132% more volatile than PAAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 6% for Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Majestic Silver Corp.

(AG) is pulling ahead at 128. 2% versus 5. 9% for Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pan American Silver Corp. grew EPS 741. 9% year-over-year, compared to -519. 4% for Endeavour Silver Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PAAS leads at 35. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 0% net margin versus -14. 5% for Endeavour Silver Corp. — meaning it keeps 27. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAAS leads at 32. 3% versus 0. 0% for NEWP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MFG leads at 41. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 01x versus First Majestic Silver Corp. 's 0. 78x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. (MFG) trades at 0. 1x forward P/E versus 20. 4x for First Majestic Silver Corp. — 20. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PAAS: 29. 7% to $75. 00.

In this comparison, MFG (1.

8% yield), PAAS (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. NEWP, AG, EXK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Pan American Silver Corp.

(PAAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 0. 8% yield, +326. 1% 10Y return). Endeavour Silver Corp. (EXK) carries a higher beta of 1. 71 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PAAS: +326. 1%, EXK: +182. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (NEWP (Basic Materials) and PAAS (Basic Materials) and AG (Basic Materials) and EXK (Basic Materials) and MFG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: NEWP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAAS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EXK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MFG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. PAAS, MFG pay a dividend while NEWP, AG, EXK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.