Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NEWT vs CARV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
NEWT vs CARV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $394M | $9M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $322M | $37M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $61M | $-13M |
| Gross Margin | 75.3% | 56.3% |
| Operating Margin | 42.5% | -36.8% |
| Forward P/E | 5.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $823M | $29M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $284M | $50M |
NEWT vs CARV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NewtekOne, Inc. (NEWT) | 100 | 79.7 | -20.3% |
| Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV) | 100 | 93.8 | -6.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NEWT vs CARV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NEWT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.69, yield 8.0%
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth 20.4%
- 142.9% 10Y total return vs CARV's -53.6%
CARV is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.08, Low D/E 98.4%, current ratio 0.15x
- Beta 0.08, current ratio 0.15x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.0% NII/revenue growth vs CARV's -8.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CARV's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.08 vs NEWT's 1.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs CARV's +18.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CARV's 0.9% |
NEWT vs CARV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NEWT vs CARV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEWT leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEWT is the larger business by revenue, generating $322M annually — 8.6x CARV's $37M. NEWT is the more profitable business, keeping 18.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CARV's -36.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $322M | $37M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $96M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $61M | -$13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$405M | -$9M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.3% | +56.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +42.5% | -36.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | -36.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | -34.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | -12.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CARV leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $394M | $9M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $933M | -$12M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.79x | -0.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.93x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.70x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.79x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.22x | 0.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 0.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.05x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NEWT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NEWT delivers a 17.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-48 for CARV. CARV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.98x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NEWT's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEWT scores 4/9 vs CARV's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.3% | -48.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | -1.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | -13.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.6% | -15.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.07x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $539M | -$21M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $284M | $50M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $823M | $29M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.10x | -0.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NEWT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NEWT five years ago would be worth $7,676 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,074 for CARV. Over the past 12 months, NEWT leads with a +45.6% total return vs CARV's +18.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NEWT at 10.6% vs CARV's -27.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.3% | +19.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.6% | +18.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.4% | -61.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.2% | -79.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.9% | -53.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.6% | -27.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NEWT and CARV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CARV is the less volatile stock with a 0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NEWT's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEWT currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs CARV's 43.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 0.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.91 | $3.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.59 | $1.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.7% | +43.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.8 | 50.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 205K | 4K |
Analyst Outlook
NEWT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
NEWT is the only dividend payer here at 8.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.09 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
NEWT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CARV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NEWT vs CARV: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NEWT or CARV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NewtekOne, Inc.
(NEWT) is the stronger pick with 1. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 3% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV). NewtekOne, Inc. (NEWT) offers the better valuation at 5. 8x trailing P/E (5. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NewtekOne, Inc. (NEWT) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NEWT or CARV?
Over the past 5 years, NewtekOne, Inc.
(NEWT) delivered a total return of -23. 2%, compared to -79. 3% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEWT returned +142. 9% versus CARV's -53. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NEWT or CARV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carver Bancorp, Inc.
(CARV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 08β versus NewtekOne, Inc. 's 1. 69β — meaning NEWT is approximately 2109% more volatile than CARV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 98% versus 2% for NewtekOne, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NEWT or CARV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NewtekOne, Inc.
(NEWT) is pulling ahead at 1. 0% versus -8. 3% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NewtekOne, Inc. grew EPS 20. 4% year-over-year, compared to -334. 4% for Carver Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NEWT or CARV?
NewtekOne, Inc.
(NEWT) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 8% net margin versus -36. 8% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEWT leads at 42. 5% versus -36. 8% for CARV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEWT leads at 75. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NEWT or CARV?
In this comparison, NEWT (8.
0% yield) pays a dividend. CARV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is NEWT or CARV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Carver Bancorp, Inc.
(CARV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 08)). NewtekOne, Inc. (NEWT) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CARV: -53. 6%, NEWT: +142. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NEWT and CARV?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NEWT is a small-cap deep-value stock; CARV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NEWT pays a dividend while CARV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.