Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NEXA vs HL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gold
NEXA vs HL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Gold |
| Market Cap | $1.84B | $12.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.98B | $1.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $133M | $559M |
| Gross Margin | 19.7% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | 13.1% | 44.1% |
| Forward P/E | 6.3x | 19.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.83B | $299M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $516M | $242M |
NEXA vs HL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nexa Resources S.A. (NEXA) | 100 | 345.7 | +245.7% |
| Hecla Mining Company (HL) | 100 | 544.8 | +444.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NEXA vs HL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NEXA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.52, yield 1.9%
- Lower P/E (6.3x vs 19.1x)
- 1.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HL's 0.1%
HL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 7.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.6%
- 360.6% 10Y total return vs NEXA's -6.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 11.5%, current ratio 2.72x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.0% revenue growth vs NEXA's 8.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.3x vs 19.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 35.6% margin vs NEXA's 4.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.26 vs NEXA's 1.52, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HL's 0.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +271.0% vs NEXA's +172.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.3% ROA vs NEXA's 2.7%, ROIC 15.3% vs 12.6% |
NEXA vs HL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NEXA vs HL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEXA is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 1.9x HL's $1.6B. HL is the more profitable business, keeping 35.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NEXA's 4.4%. On growth, HL holds the edge at +57.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $728M | $853M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $133M | $559M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $45M | $472M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +44.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | +35.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +30.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.9% | +57.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +151.4% | -160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NEXA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.9x trailing earnings, NEXA trades at a 62% valuation discount to HL's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NEXA's 4.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HL's 17.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $12.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $12.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.93x | 36.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.31x | 19.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.12x | 17.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.62x | 8.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.43x | 4.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 35.50x | 39.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HL leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $11 for NEXA. HL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NEXA's 1.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs NEXA's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.0% | +22.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +16.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.6% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.2% | +16.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.42x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.3B | $57M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $516M | $242M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $299M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.20x | 19.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,033 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,076 for NEXA. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +271.0% total return vs NEXA's +172.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HL at 43.4% vs NEXA's 33.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +58.5% | -4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +172.4% | +271.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +136.6% | +194.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.8% | +150.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.0% | +360.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.3% | +43.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NEXA and HL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HL is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NEXA's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEXA currently trades 82.7% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 1.26x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.84 | $34.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.44 | $4.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.7% | +52.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.8 | 46.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 15.4M |
Analyst Outlook
NEXA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NEXA as "Hold" and HL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.7% upside for HL (target: $24) vs -20.3% for NEXA (target: $11). NEXA is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.10 | $23.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.26 | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
HL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NEXA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
NEXA vs HL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NEXA or HL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger pick with 53.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 2% for Nexa Resources S. A. (NEXA). Nexa Resources S. A. (NEXA) offers the better valuation at 13. 9x trailing P/E (6. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nexa Resources S. A. (NEXA) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NEXA or HL?
On trailing P/E, Nexa Resources S.
A. (NEXA) is the cheapest at 13. 9x versus Hecla Mining Company at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Nexa Resources S. A. is actually cheaper at 6. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NEXA or HL?
Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.
3%, compared to +40. 8% for Nexa Resources S. A. (NEXA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus NEXA's -6. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NEXA or HL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
26β versus Nexa Resources S. A. 's 1. 52β — meaning NEXA is approximately 21% more volatile than HL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hecla Mining Company (HL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 142% for Nexa Resources S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NEXA or HL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is pulling ahead at 53.
0% versus 8. 2% for Nexa Resources S. A. (NEXA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to 164. 5% for Nexa Resources S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HL leads at 25. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NEXA or HL?
Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
6% net margin versus 4. 4% for Nexa Resources S. A. — meaning it keeps 22. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus 13. 7% for NEXA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HL leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NEXA or HL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Nexa Resources S.
A. (NEXA) trades at 6. 3x forward P/E versus 19. 1x for Hecla Mining Company — 12. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HL: 31. 7% to $23. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — NEXA or HL?
In this comparison, NEXA (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. HL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NEXA or HL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nexa Resources S.
A. (NEXA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEXA: -6. 0%, HL: +360. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NEXA and HL?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NEXA is a small-cap deep-value stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. NEXA pays a dividend while HL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.