Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

NEXA vs HL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
NEXA
Nexa Resources S.A.

Industrial Materials

Basic MaterialsNYSE • LU
Market Cap$1.84B
5Y Perf.+245.7%
HL
Hecla Mining Company

Gold

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$12.13B
5Y Perf.+444.8%

NEXA vs HL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
NEXA logoNEXA
HL logoHL
IndustryIndustrial MaterialsGold
Market Cap$1.84B$12.13B
Revenue (TTM)$2.98B$1.57B
Net Income (TTM)$133M$559M
Gross Margin19.7%50.9%
Operating Margin13.1%44.1%
Forward P/E6.3x19.1x
Total Debt$1.83B$299M
Cash & Equiv.$516M$242M

NEXA vs HLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

NEXA
HL
StockMay 20May 26Return
Nexa Resources S.A. (NEXA)100345.7+245.7%
Hecla Mining Company (HL)100544.8+444.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: NEXA vs HL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HL leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Nexa Resources S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NEXA
Nexa Resources S.A.
The Income Pick

NEXA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.52, yield 1.9%
  • Lower P/E (6.3x vs 19.1x)
  • 1.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HL's 0.1%
Best for: income & stability
HL
Hecla Mining Company
The Growth Play

HL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 53.0%, EPS growth 7.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.6%
  • 360.6% 10Y total return vs NEXA's -6.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.26, Low D/E 11.5%, current ratio 2.72x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHL logoHL53.0% revenue growth vs NEXA's 8.2%
ValueNEXA logoNEXALower P/E (6.3x vs 19.1x)
Quality / MarginsHL logoHL35.6% margin vs NEXA's 4.4%
Stability / SafetyHL logoHLBeta 1.26 vs NEXA's 1.52, lower leverage
DividendsNEXA logoNEXA1.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HL's 0.1%
Momentum (1Y)HL logoHL+271.0% vs NEXA's +172.4%
Efficiency (ROA)HL logoHL16.3% ROA vs NEXA's 2.7%, ROIC 15.3% vs 12.6%

NEXA vs HL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

NEXANexa Resources S.A.
FY 2025
Zinc
53.0%$1.6B
Lead
18.0%$539M
Copper
16.8%$505M
Other
5.6%$168M
Silver
3.6%$108M
Freight And Insurance Services
3.1%$92M
HLHecla Mining Company
FY 2024
Silver Contracts
43.5%$414M
Gold
33.5%$318M
Zinc
13.8%$131M
Lead
9.2%$87M
Copper
0.0%$416,000

NEXA vs HL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHLLAGGINGNEXA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

NEXA is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.0B annually — 1.9x HL's $1.6B. HL is the more profitable business, keeping 35.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NEXA's 4.4%. On growth, HL holds the edge at +57.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricNEXA logoNEXANexa Resources S.…HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.0B$1.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$728M$853M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$133M$559M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$45M$472M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+19.7%+50.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+13.1%+44.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.4%+35.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.5%+30.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+20.9%+57.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+151.4%-160.0%
HL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NEXA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 13.9x trailing earnings, NEXA trades at a 62% valuation discount to HL's 36.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NEXA's 4.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HL's 17.3x.

MetricNEXA logoNEXANexa Resources S.…HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
Market CapShares × price$1.8B$12.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.2B$12.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS13.93x36.92x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.31x19.07x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.12x17.25x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.62x8.53x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.43x4.58x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF35.50x39.11x
NEXA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HL leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

HL delivers a 22.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $11 for NEXA. HL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NEXA's 1.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HL scores 8/9 vs NEXA's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricNEXA logoNEXANexa Resources S.…HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+11.0%+22.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.7%+16.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.6%+15.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.2%+16.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–968
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.42x0.12x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.3B$57M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$516M$242M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.8B$299M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.20x19.04x
HL leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HL five years ago would be worth $25,033 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,076 for NEXA. Over the past 12 months, HL leads with a +271.0% total return vs NEXA's +172.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HL at 43.4% vs NEXA's 33.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricNEXA logoNEXANexa Resources S.…HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+58.5%-4.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+172.4%+271.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+136.6%+194.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+40.8%+150.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-6.0%+360.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+33.3%+43.4%
HL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NEXA and HL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HL is the less volatile stock with a 1.26 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NEXA's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEXA currently trades 82.7% from its 52-week high vs HL's 52.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricNEXA logoNEXANexa Resources S.…HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.52x1.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$16.84$34.17
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.44$4.68
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+82.7%+52.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10073.846.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.1M15.4M
Evenly matched — NEXA and HL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

NEXA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates NEXA as "Hold" and HL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.7% upside for HL (target: $24) vs -20.3% for NEXA (target: $11). NEXA is the only dividend payer here at 1.86% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricNEXA logoNEXANexa Resources S.…HL logoHLHecla Mining Comp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$11.10$23.83
# AnalystsCovering analysts1026
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.9%+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.26$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.0%
NEXA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NEXA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallHecla Mining Company (HL)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

NEXA vs HL: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is NEXA or HL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the stronger pick with 53.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 2% for Nexa Resources S. A. (NEXA). Nexa Resources S. A. (NEXA) offers the better valuation at 13. 9x trailing P/E (6. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nexa Resources S. A. (NEXA) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — NEXA or HL?

On trailing P/E, Nexa Resources S.

A. (NEXA) is the cheapest at 13. 9x versus Hecla Mining Company at 36. 9x. On forward P/E, Nexa Resources S. A. is actually cheaper at 6. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — NEXA or HL?

Over the past 5 years, Hecla Mining Company (HL) delivered a total return of +150.

3%, compared to +40. 8% for Nexa Resources S. A. (NEXA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HL returned +360. 6% versus NEXA's -6. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — NEXA or HL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

26β versus Nexa Resources S. A. 's 1. 52β — meaning NEXA is approximately 21% more volatile than HL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hecla Mining Company (HL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 142% for Nexa Resources S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — NEXA or HL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hecla Mining Company (HL) is pulling ahead at 53.

0% versus 8. 2% for Nexa Resources S. A. (NEXA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hecla Mining Company grew EPS 765. 7% year-over-year, compared to 164. 5% for Nexa Resources S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HL leads at 25. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — NEXA or HL?

Hecla Mining Company (HL) is the more profitable company, earning 22.

6% net margin versus 4. 4% for Nexa Resources S. A. — meaning it keeps 22. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HL leads at 37. 5% versus 13. 7% for NEXA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HL leads at 41. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is NEXA or HL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Nexa Resources S.

A. (NEXA) trades at 6. 3x forward P/E versus 19. 1x for Hecla Mining Company — 12. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HL: 31. 7% to $23. 83.

08

Which pays a better dividend — NEXA or HL?

In this comparison, NEXA (1.

9% yield) pays a dividend. HL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is NEXA or HL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Nexa Resources S.

A. (NEXA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEXA: -6. 0%, HL: +360. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between NEXA and HL?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NEXA is a small-cap deep-value stock; HL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. NEXA pays a dividend while HL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

NEXA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform NEXA and HL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(NEXA: 20.9% · HL: 57.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(NEXA: 4.4% · HL: 35.6%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(NEXA: 13.9x · HL: 36.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.