NEXN
Nexxen International Ltd.
Advertising Agencies
Market Cap$438M
5Y Perf.-61.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
NEXN vs IAS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.
Advertising Agencies
Market Cap$1.74B
5Y Perf.-50.0%
NEXN vs IAS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | NEXN | IAS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $438M | $1.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $365M | $591M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $25M | $47M |
| Gross Margin | 71.9% | 77.4% |
| Operating Margin | 8.9% | 11.1% |
| Forward P/E | 7.2x | 27.5x |
| Total Debt | $32M | $58M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $133M | $84M |
NEXN vs IAS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
NEXN
IAS
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nexxen Internationa… (NEXN) | 100 | 38.8 | -61.2% |
| Integral Ad Science… (IAS) | 100 | 50.0 | -50.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NEXN vs IAS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: IAS leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Nexxen International Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NEXN
Nexxen International Ltd.
The Value Play
NEXN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (7.2x vs 27.5x)
Best for: value
IAS
Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.
The Income Pick
IAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.83
- Rev growth 11.7%, EPS growth 413.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.9%
- -49.8% 10Y total return vs NEXN's -56.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | IAS | 11.7% revenue growth vs NEXN's -0.2% |
| Value | NEXN | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 27.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | IAS | 7.9% margin vs NEXN's 6.9% |
| Stability / Safety | IAS | Beta 0.83 vs NEXN's 1.18, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | IAS | +40.1% vs NEXN's -29.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | IAS | 3.9% ROA vs NEXN's 3.3%, ROIC 4.6% vs 6.5% |
NEXN vs IAS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
NEXN vs IAS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLIASLAGGINGNEXN
NEXNNexxen International …
2leads
IASIntegral Ad Science H…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs NEXNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
IAS4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
NEXN6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
NEXN5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
IAS3/5
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
IAS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IAS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IAS is the larger business by revenue, generating $591M annually — 1.6x NEXN's $365M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.9% (IAS) to 6.9% (NEXN). On growth, IAS holds the edge at +15.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | NEXNNexxen Internatio… | IASIntegral Ad Scien… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $365M | $591M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $96M | $125M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $25M | $47M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $104M | $165M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.9% | +77.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.9% | +11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +7.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +27.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.3% | +15.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -51.4% | -57.4% |
IAS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
NEXN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.9x trailing earnings, NEXN trades at a 58% valuation discount to IAS's 45.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NEXN's 3.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IAS's 13.7x.
| Metric | NEXNNexxen Internatio… | IASIntegral Ad Scien… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $438M | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $337M | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.85x | 44.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.25x | 27.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.28x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.52x | 13.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.20x | 3.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.99x | 1.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.47x | 22.44x |
NEXN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NEXN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NEXN delivers a 5.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $4 for IAS. IAS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NEXN's 0.07x.
| Metric | NEXNNexxen Internatio… | IASIntegral Ad Scien… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.2% | +4.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.5% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$101M | -$27M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $133M | $84M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $58M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.46x | 93.78x |
NEXN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IAS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IAS five years ago would be worth $5,024 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,318 for NEXN. Over the past 12 months, IAS leads with a +40.1% total return vs NEXN's -29.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NEXN at 13.0% vs IAS's -15.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NEXNNexxen Internatio… | IASIntegral Ad Scien… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.3% | — |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.3% | +40.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.2% | -39.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.8% | -49.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.8% | -49.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.0% | -15.2% |
IAS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IAS is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NEXN's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IAS currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs NEXN's 61.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | NEXNNexxen Internatio… | IASIntegral Ad Scien… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.60 | $10.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.60 | $7.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.3% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.4 | 67.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 323K | 0 |
IAS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NEXN as "Buy" and IAS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.3% upside for NEXN (target: $11) vs 38.2% for IAS (target: $14).
| Metric | NEXNNexxen Internatio… | IASIntegral Ad Scien… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.00 | $14.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +23.2% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
IAS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). NEXN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
Best OverallIntegral Ad Science Holding… (IAS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
NEXN vs IAS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NEXN or IAS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.
(IAS) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for Nexxen International Ltd. (NEXN). Nexxen International Ltd. (NEXN) offers the better valuation at 18. 9x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nexxen International Ltd. (NEXN) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NEXN or IAS?
On trailing P/E, Nexxen International Ltd.
(NEXN) is the cheapest at 18. 9x versus Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. at 45. 0x. On forward P/E, Nexxen International Ltd. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NEXN or IAS?
Over the past 5 years, Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.
(IAS) delivered a total return of -49. 8%, compared to -56. 8% for Nexxen International Ltd. (NEXN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IAS returned -49. 8% versus NEXN's -56. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NEXN or IAS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.
(IAS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Nexxen International Ltd. 's 1. 18β — meaning NEXN is approximately 42% more volatile than IAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (IAS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 7% for Nexxen International Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NEXN or IAS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.
(IAS) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -0. 2% for Nexxen International Ltd. (NEXN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. grew EPS 413. 4% year-over-year, compared to -19. 6% for Nexxen International Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IAS leads at 17. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NEXN or IAS?
Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.
(IAS) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus 6. 9% for Nexxen International Ltd. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IAS leads at 11. 4% versus 8. 9% for NEXN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IAS leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NEXN or IAS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Nexxen International Ltd.
(NEXN) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 27. 5x for Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. — 20. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NEXN: 42. 3% to $11. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NEXN or IAS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is NEXN or IAS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.
(IAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IAS: -49. 8%, NEXN: -56. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NEXN and IAS?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(NEXN: -10.3% · IAS: 15.6%)Net Margin>
%
(NEXN: 6.9% · IAS: 7.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(NEXN: 18.9x · IAS: 45.0x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.