Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NEXT vs CQP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
NEXT vs CQP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $2.02B | $30.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $10.31B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-306M | $2.32B |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | 28.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $8.66B | $15.27B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $144M | $379M |
NEXT vs CQP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NextDecade Corporat… (NEXT) | 100 | 504.6 | +404.6% |
| Cheniere Energy Par… (CQP) | 100 | 187.4 | +87.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NEXT vs CQP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NEXT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta -0.14
CQP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -9.9%, EPS growth -38.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.6%
- 228.2% 10Y total return vs NEXT's -23.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.08, current ratio 0.77x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -9.9% revenue growth vs NEXT's -429.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.5% margin vs NEXT's -1.4% | |
| Dividends | 7.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.2% vs NEXT's +2.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.8% ROA vs NEXT's -3.3%, ROIC 17.0% vs -2.1% |
NEXT vs CQP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NEXT vs CQP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CQP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CQP and NEXT operate at a comparable scale, with $10.3B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $10.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$211M | $3.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$306M | $2.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5.3B | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +38.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +28.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +22.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +26.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +17.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -172.0% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NEXT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $30.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.5B | $45.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.51x | 14.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.10x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CQP leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CQP scores 5/9 vs NEXT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.6% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.3% | +13.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.1% | +17.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.7% | +20.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.76x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.5B | $14.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $144M | $379M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.7B | $15.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.76x | 4.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CQP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NEXT five years ago would be worth $37,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,414 for CQP. Over the past 12 months, CQP leads with a +13.2% total return vs NEXT's +2.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CQP at 17.4% vs NEXT's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.6% | +18.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.7% | +13.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.2% | +61.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +275.4% | +94.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.0% | +228.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.9% | +17.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NEXT and CQP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEXT is the less volatile stock with a -0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CQP's 0.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CQP currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs NEXT's 62.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.14x | 0.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.12 | $70.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.75 | $49.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.9% | +89.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 49.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.1M | 120K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NEXT as "Hold" and CQP as "Sell". Consensus price targets imply 18.6% upside for CQP (target: $75) vs -8.1% for NEXT (target: $7). CQP is the only dividend payer here at 7.30% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $75.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.62 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | 0.0% |
CQP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NEXT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NEXT vs CQP: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NEXT or CQP a better buy right now?
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.
P. (CQP) offers the better valuation at 14. 9x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NextDecade Corporation (NEXT) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NEXT or CQP?
Over the past 5 years, NextDecade Corporation (NEXT) delivered a total return of +275.
4%, compared to +94. 1% for Cheniere Energy Partners, L. P. (CQP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CQP returned +228. 2% versus NEXT's -23. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NEXT or CQP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NextDecade Corporation (NEXT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
14β versus Cheniere Energy Partners, L. P. 's 0. 08β — meaning CQP is approximately -156% more volatile than NEXT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — NEXT or CQP?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cheniere Energy Partners, L.
P. grew EPS -38. 8% year-over-year, compared to -387. 5% for NextDecade Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NEXT or CQP?
Cheniere Energy Partners, L.
P. (CQP) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 8% net margin versus 0. 0% for NextDecade Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CQP leads at 37. 7% versus 0. 0% for NEXT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CQP leads at 51. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NEXT or CQP more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CQP: 18.
6% to $75. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — NEXT or CQP?
In this comparison, CQP (7.
3% yield) pays a dividend. NEXT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is NEXT or CQP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cheniere Energy Partners, L.
P. (CQP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 08), 7. 3% yield, +228. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CQP: +228. 2%, NEXT: -23. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NEXT and CQP?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NEXT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CQP is a mid-cap deep-value stock. CQP pays a dividend while NEXT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.