NFGC vs GROY vs WPM vs RGLD

For growth investors, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

(WPM) is the stronger pick with 83. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 44. 6% for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD). Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD) offers the better valuation at 34. 8x trailing P/E (19. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate New Found Gold Corp. (NFGC) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Royal Gold, Inc.

(RGLD) is the cheapest at 34. 8x versus Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. at 40. 0x. On forward P/E, New Found Gold Corp. is actually cheaper at 14. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. wins at 1. 07x versus Royal Gold, Inc. 's 2. 51x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

(WPM) delivered a total return of +207. 9%, compared to -69. 7% for New Found Gold Corp. (NFGC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WPM returned +649. 6% versus GROY's +2. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

(WPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus New Found Gold Corp. 's 1. 18β — meaning NFGC is approximately 88% more volatile than WPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gold Royalty Corp. (GROY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 13% for Royal Gold, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

(WPM) is pulling ahead at 83. 3% versus 44. 6% for Royal Gold, Inc. (RGLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. grew EPS 181. 2% year-over-year, compared to -18. 0% for Gold Royalty Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GROY leads at 58. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

(WPM) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 6% net margin versus -26. 5% for Gold Royalty Corp. — meaning it keeps 63. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WPM leads at 68. 8% versus 0. 0% for NFGC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GROY leads at 75. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 07x versus Royal Gold, Inc. 's 2. 51x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, New Found Gold Corp. (NFGC) trades at 14. 5x forward P/E versus 62. 1x for Gold Royalty Corp. — 47. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GROY: 63. 8% to $5. 88.

In this comparison, RGLD (0.

7% yield), WPM (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. NFGC, GROY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

(WPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 0. 5% yield, +649. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WPM: +649. 6%, NFGC: +13. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: NFGC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GROY is a small-cap high-growth stock; WPM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RGLD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. WPM, RGLD pay a dividend while NFGC, GROY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.