Gold
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NGD vs LIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
NGD vs LIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gold | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $7.19B | $231.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.23B | $34.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $248M | $7.13B |
| Gross Margin | 41.4% | 46.0% |
| Operating Margin | 35.2% | 28.8% |
| Forward P/E | 6.6x | 28.0x |
| Total Debt | $400M | $26.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $105M | $5.06B |
NGD vs LIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Gold Inc. (NGD) | 100 | 750.4 | +650.4% |
| Linde plc (LIN) | 100 | 251.1 | +151.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NGD vs LIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NGD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 17.5%, EPS growth 248.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 38.0%, current ratio 1.39x
- 17.5% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0%
LIN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 1.2%
- 379.1% 10Y total return vs NGD's 106.8%
- Beta 0.24, yield 1.2%, current ratio 0.88x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.5% revenue growth vs LIN's 3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 28.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs NGD's 20.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs NGD's 0.97 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +131.0% vs LIN's +11.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs LIN's 8.3%, ROIC 11.6% vs 11.3% |
NGD vs LIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NGD vs LIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NGD and LIN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 28.2x NGD's $1.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 20.6% (LIN) to 20.2% (NGD). On growth, NGD holds the edge at +78.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $34.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $684M | $12.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $248M | $7.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $53M | $5.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.4% | +46.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.2% | +28.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.1% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
LIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.3x trailing earnings, LIN trades at a 47% valuation discount to NGD's 64.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NGD's 17.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LIN's 20.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.2B | $231.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.5B | $253.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 64.86x | 34.30x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.62x | 28.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.69x | 19.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.78x | 6.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.49x | 5.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 59.07x | 45.56x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NGD leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NGD delivers a 22.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $18 for LIN. NGD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIN's 0.68x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.4% | +17.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.1% | +8.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.6% | +11.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.4% | +13.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.38x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $295M | $21.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $105M | $5.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $400M | $27.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.18x | 34.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NGD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NGD five years ago would be worth $52,791 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,055 for LIN. Over the past 12 months, NGD leads with a +131.0% total return vs LIN's +11.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NGD at 86.9% vs LIN's 12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.1% | +17.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +131.0% | +11.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +553.2% | +41.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +427.9% | +80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.8% | +379.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +86.9% | +12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NGD's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIN currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs NGD's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 0.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.63 | $521.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.67 | $387.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.6% | +96.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.6 | 45.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.4M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NGD as "Buy" and LIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.3% upside for NGD (target: $12) vs 7.9% for LIN (target: $540). LIN is the only dividend payer here at 1.20% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.38 | $539.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $6.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.0% |
LIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). NGD leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
NGD vs LIN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NGD or LIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, New Gold Inc.
(NGD) is the stronger pick with 17. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). Linde plc (LIN) offers the better valuation at 34. 3x trailing P/E (28. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate New Gold Inc. (NGD) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NGD or LIN?
On trailing P/E, Linde plc (LIN) is the cheapest at 34.
3x versus New Gold Inc. at 64. 9x. On forward P/E, New Gold Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NGD or LIN?
Over the past 5 years, New Gold Inc.
(NGD) delivered a total return of +427. 9%, compared to +80. 6% for Linde plc (LIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIN returned +379. 1% versus NGD's +106. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NGD or LIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
24β versus New Gold Inc. 's 0. 97β — meaning NGD is approximately 305% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, New Gold Inc. (NGD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 68% for Linde plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NGD or LIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), New Gold Inc.
(NGD) is pulling ahead at 17. 5% versus 3. 0% for Linde plc (LIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: New Gold Inc. grew EPS 248. 5% year-over-year, compared to 7. 1% for Linde plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, NGD leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NGD or LIN?
Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
3% net margin versus 11. 1% for New Gold Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus 19. 7% for NGD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIN leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NGD or LIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, New Gold Inc.
(NGD) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 28. 0x for Linde plc — 21. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NGD: 36. 3% to $12. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — NGD or LIN?
In this comparison, LIN (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. NGD does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NGD or LIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
24), 1. 2% yield, +379. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +379. 1%, NGD: +106. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NGD and LIN?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NGD is a small-cap high-growth stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock. LIN pays a dividend while NGD does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.