Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
NGL vs CAPL vs MMLP vs WES
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
NGL vs CAPL vs MMLP vs WES — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $1.97B | $790M | $94M | $16.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.03B | $4.62B | $711M | $4.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $159M | $60M | $-20M | $1.21B |
| Gross Margin | 46.8% | 8.5% | 22.3% | 68.8% |
| Operating Margin | 13.3% | 2.6% | 5.8% | 40.6% |
| Forward P/E | 46.8x | 48.2x | — | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $3.08B | $908M | $525M | $8.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $3M | $49K | $819M |
NGL vs CAPL vs MMLP vs WES — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NGL Energy Partners… (NGL) | 100 | 312.0 | +212.0% |
| CrossAmerica Partne… (CAPL) | 100 | 137.2 | +37.2% |
| Martin Midstream Pa… (MMLP) | 100 | 96.4 | -3.6% |
| Western Midstream P… (WES) | 100 | 441.6 | +341.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NGL vs CAPL vs MMLP vs WES
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NGL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 71.0% 10Y total return vs CAPL's 87.2%
- 14.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs WES's 8.6%
- +426.8% vs MMLP's -19.0%
CAPL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 10.1%
- Beta 0.06 vs NGL's 0.67
MMLP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WES carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 6.6%, EPS growth -25.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, current ratio 1.34x
- Beta 0.28, yield 8.6%, current ratio 1.34x
- 6.6% revenue growth vs NGL's -16.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.6% revenue growth vs NGL's -16.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.9x vs 48.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.9% margin vs MMLP's -2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs NGL's 0.67 | |
| Dividends | 14.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs WES's 8.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +426.8% vs MMLP's -19.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.9% ROA vs MMLP's -3.9%, ROIC 10.5% vs 8.0% |
NGL vs CAPL vs MMLP vs WES — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NGL vs CAPL vs MMLP vs WES — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WES leads in 2 of 6 categories
NGL leads 1 • CAPL leads 0 • MMLP leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WES leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.6B annually — 6.5x MMLP's $711M. WES is the more profitable business, keeping 29.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MMLP's -2.8%. On growth, WES holds the edge at +22.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $4.6B | $711M | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $672M | $200M | $91M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $159M | $60M | -$20M | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $291M | $75M | $15M | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.8% | +8.5% | +22.3% | +68.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.3% | +2.6% | +5.8% | +40.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.3% | +1.3% | -2.8% | +29.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.6% | +1.6% | +2.2% | +33.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.3% | -100.0% | -2.5% | +22.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.2% | +2.4% | -5.6% | +10.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NGL and MMLP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.8x trailing earnings, WES trades at a 28% valuation discount to CAPL's 19.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CAPL's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WES's 10.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $790M | $94M | $16.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.0B | $1.7B | $619M | $24.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -26.52x | 19.01x | -6.51x | 13.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 46.79x | 48.19x | — | 12.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.67x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.46x | 5.73x | 6.38x | 10.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.57x | 0.22x | 0.13x | 4.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.01x | — | — | 3.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.14x | 14.17x | 6.73x | 11.49x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WES leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NGL delivers a 132.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $133 in annual profit, vs $33 for WES. WES carries lower financial leverage with a 2.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NGL's 4.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NGL scores 7/9 vs MMLP's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +132.6% | — | — | +33.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.6% | +6.0% | -3.9% | +8.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.4% | +18.1% | +8.0% | +10.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.3% | +23.4% | +11.4% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.42x | — | — | 2.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.1B | $905M | $525M | $8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $3M | $49,000 | $819M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.1B | $908M | $525M | $8.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.15x | 1.86x | 0.72x | 6.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NGL five years ago would be worth $75,047 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,866 for MMLP. Over the past 12 months, NGL leads with a +426.8% total return vs MMLP's -19.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NGL at 79.7% vs MMLP's -0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +60.7% | +5.6% | -10.6% | +8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +426.8% | -0.0% | -19.0% | +26.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +480.7% | +31.8% | -1.4% | +99.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +650.5% | +55.1% | +8.7% | +163.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.0% | +87.2% | -59.9% | +60.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +79.7% | +9.6% | -0.5% | +26.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NGL and CAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CAPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NGL's 0.67 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NGL currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs MMLP's 68.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.67x | 0.06x | 0.39x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.69 | $23.62 | $3.54 | $44.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.98 | $19.61 | $2.21 | $35.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.3% | +87.7% | +68.1% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.2 | 44.0 | 39.8 | 60.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 239K | 55K | 18K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NGL and WES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NGL as "Hold", CAPL as "Hold", MMLP as "Buy", WES as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -0.6% upside for WES (target: $41) vs -87.4% for NGL (target: $2). For income investors, NGL offers the higher dividend yield at 14.54% vs MMLP's 0.85%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.00 | — | — | $41.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 15 | 11 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +14.5% | +10.1% | +0.9% | +8.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.31 | $2.10 | $0.02 | $3.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
WES leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NGL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
NGL vs CAPL vs MMLP vs WES: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NGL or CAPL or MMLP or WES a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) is the stronger pick with 6.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 5% for NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL). Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) offers the better valuation at 13. 8x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Martin Midstream Partners L. P. (MMLP) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NGL or CAPL or MMLP or WES?
On trailing P/E, Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) is the cheapest at 13.
8x versus CrossAmerica Partners LP at 19. 0x. On forward P/E, Western Midstream Partners, LP is actually cheaper at 12. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NGL or CAPL or MMLP or WES?
Over the past 5 years, NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) delivered a total return of +650.
5%, compared to +8. 7% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P. (MMLP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAPL returned +87. 2% versus MMLP's -59. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NGL or CAPL or MMLP or WES?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
06β versus NGL Energy Partners LP's 0. 67β — meaning NGL is approximately 1105% more volatile than CAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 4% for NGL Energy Partners LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NGL or CAPL or MMLP or WES?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) is pulling ahead at 6.
6% versus -16. 5% for NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CrossAmerica Partners LP grew EPS 109. 6% year-over-year, compared to -184. 6% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WES leads at 5. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NGL or CAPL or MMLP or WES?
Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) is the more profitable company, earning 30.
4% net margin versus -2. 0% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P. — meaning it keeps 30. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WES leads at 41. 3% versus 5. 6% for CAPL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WES leads at 68. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NGL or CAPL or MMLP or WES more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Western Midstream Partners, LP (WES) trades at 12.
9x forward P/E versus 48. 2x for CrossAmerica Partners LP — 35. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WES: -0. 6% to $41. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NGL or CAPL or MMLP or WES?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) offers the highest yield at 14. 5%, versus 0. 9% for Martin Midstream Partners L. P. (MMLP).
09Is NGL or CAPL or MMLP or WES better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CrossAmerica Partners LP (CAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 10. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CAPL: +87. 2%, NGL: +71. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NGL and CAPL and MMLP and WES?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NGL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CAPL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MMLP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WES is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.