NGL vs GEL

For growth investors, NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) is the stronger pick with -16.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -45. 0% for Genesis Energy, L. P. (GEL). Analysts rate Genesis Energy, L. P. (GEL) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) delivered a total return of +670.

4%, compared to +113. 0% for Genesis Energy, L. P. (GEL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NGL returned +81. 6% versus GEL's -5. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Genesis Energy, L.

P. (GEL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus NGL Energy Partners LP's 0. 67β — meaning NGL is approximately 108% more volatile than GEL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genesis Energy, L. P. (GEL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 4% for NGL Energy Partners LP — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) is pulling ahead at -16.

5% versus -45. 0% for Genesis Energy, L. P. (GEL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NGL Energy Partners LP grew EPS 72. 0% year-over-year, compared to 41. 1% for Genesis Energy, L. P.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GEL leads at -16. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) is the more profitable company, earning 1.

1% net margin versus -0. 5% for Genesis Energy, L. P. — meaning it keeps 1. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GEL leads at 15. 8% versus 9. 5% for NGL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GEL leads at 21. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Genesis Energy, L.

P. (GEL) trades at 21. 3x forward P/E versus 48. 3x for NGL Energy Partners LP — 26. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GEL: 18. 8% to $20. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL) offers the highest yield at 14. 1%, versus 3. 9% for Genesis Energy, L. P. (GEL).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Genesis Energy, L.

P. (GEL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), 3. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GEL: -5. 3%, NGL: +81. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.