Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NHC vs EHC vs PNTG vs ADUS vs CCRN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
Medical - Care Facilities
NHC vs EHC vs PNTG vs ADUS vs CCRN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $2.66B | $10.66B | $1.24B | $1.81B | $423M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.50B | $6.07B | $1.02B | $1.45B | $761M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $101M | $609M | $30M | $100M | $-99M |
| Gross Margin | 38.5% | 58.8% | 11.1% | 32.5% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | 8.1% | 16.8% | 5.6% | 9.8% | -0.9% |
| Forward P/E | 21.5x | 18.1x | 27.0x | 14.1x | 133.8x |
| Total Debt | $87M | $2.71B | $453M | $209M | $2M |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $103M | $17M | $82M | $109M |
NHC vs EHC vs PNTG vs ADUS vs CCRN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| National HealthCare… (NHC) | 100 | 255.6 | +155.6% |
| Encompass Health Co… (EHC) | 100 | 184.0 | +84.0% |
| The Pennant Group, … (PNTG) | 100 | 140.2 | +40.2% |
| Addus HomeCare Corp… (ADUS) | 100 | 98.3 | -1.7% |
| Cross Country Healt… (CCRN) | 100 | 215.7 | +115.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NHC vs EHC vs PNTG vs ADUS vs CCRN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NHC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 1.4%
- 1.4% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs EHC's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- +81.9% vs ADUS's -13.4%
EHC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.40, yield 0.6%, current ratio 1.08x
- 10.0% margin vs CCRN's -13.0%
- Beta 0.40 vs PNTG's 0.79, lower leverage
- 8.7% ROA vs CCRN's -19.8%, ROIC 13.9% vs -0.9%
PNTG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 36.3%, EPS growth 18.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.0%
- 36.3% revenue growth vs CCRN's -21.6%
ADUS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 399.9% 10Y total return vs EHC's 252.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.58, Low D/E 19.2%, current ratio 1.80x
- PEG 0.70 vs PNTG's 2.68
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 27.0x), PEG 0.70 vs 2.68
Among these 5 stocks, CCRN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.3% revenue growth vs CCRN's -21.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 27.0x), PEG 0.70 vs 2.68 | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.0% margin vs CCRN's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs PNTG's 0.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs EHC's 0.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +81.9% vs ADUS's -13.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.7% ROA vs CCRN's -19.8%, ROIC 13.9% vs -0.9% |
NHC vs EHC vs PNTG vs ADUS vs CCRN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NHC vs EHC vs PNTG vs ADUS vs CCRN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EHC leads in 2 of 6 categories
NHC leads 2 • CCRN leads 1 • PNTG leads 0 • ADUS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EHC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EHC is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.1B annually — 8.0x CCRN's $761M. EHC is the more profitable business, keeping 10.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CCRN's -13.0%. On growth, PNTG holds the edge at +36.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.5B | $6.1B | $1.0B | $1.4B | $761M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $166M | $1.4B | $66M | $159M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $101M | $609M | $30M | $100M | -$99M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $147M | $172M | $47M | $137M | $41M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.5% | +58.8% | +11.1% | +32.5% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +16.8% | +5.6% | +9.8% | -0.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.7% | +10.0% | +3.0% | +6.9% | -13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.8% | +2.8% | +4.6% | +9.5% | +5.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.5% | +9.0% | +36.0% | +7.7% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.4% | +19.6% | +9.1% | +17.2% | -6.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CCRN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.7x trailing earnings, ADUS trades at a 56% valuation discount to PNTG's 42.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ADUS offers better value at 0.93x vs PNTG's 4.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $10.7B | $1.2B | $1.8B | $423M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $13.3B | $1.7B | $1.9B | $317M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.35x | 19.35x | 42.54x | 18.67x | -4.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.51x | 18.10x | 26.97x | 14.12x | 133.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.97x | 1.36x | 4.23x | 0.93x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.85x | 9.61x | 27.97x | 12.52x | 23.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 1.80x | 1.31x | 1.28x | 0.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.50x | 3.34x | 3.37x | 1.65x | 1.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.89x | 24.26x | 47.16x | 17.48x | 10.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EHC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EHC delivers a 18.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-27 for CCRN. CCRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PNTG's 1.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EHC scores 9/9 vs NHC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +18.9% | +8.4% | +9.3% | -27.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.4% | +8.7% | +3.5% | +7.0% | -19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.4% | +13.9% | +5.6% | +8.8% | -0.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +17.6% | +7.3% | +10.9% | -0.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.83x | 1.21x | 0.19x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $87M | $2.6B | $436M | $127M | -$106M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $103M | $17M | $82M | $109M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $87M | $2.7B | $453M | $209M | $2M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 24.41x | 6.54x | 16.52x | 14.45x | -1.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NHC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NHC five years ago would be worth $26,213 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,746 for CCRN. Over the past 12 months, NHC leads with a +81.9% total return vs ADUS's -13.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NHC at 46.5% vs CCRN's -17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.9% | +1.1% | +28.4% | -8.7% | +62.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +81.9% | -8.1% | +28.7% | -13.4% | -5.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +214.6% | +75.4% | +204.1% | +16.3% | -44.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +162.1% | +63.3% | -6.9% | +0.0% | -22.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.2% | +252.2% | +136.8% | +399.9% | -10.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +46.5% | +20.6% | +44.9% | +5.2% | -17.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EHC and PNTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EHC is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PNTG's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PNTG currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs ADUS's 78.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.60x | 0.40x | 0.79x | 0.58x | 0.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $184.08 | $127.99 | $35.84 | $124.44 | $14.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $93.54 | $92.77 | $21.73 | $90.89 | $7.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.1% | +83.7% | +99.7% | +78.2% | +87.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 53.6 | 62.5 | 49.3 | 53.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 117K | 921K | 245K | 236K | 552K |
Analyst Outlook
NHC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EHC as "Buy", PNTG as "Buy", ADUS as "Buy", CCRN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 42.8% upside for EHC (target: $153) vs -18.9% for CCRN (target: $11). For income investors, NHC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.44% vs EHC's 0.65%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $153.00 | $39.00 | $128.67 | $10.61 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 26 | 7 | 15 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +0.6% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.47 | $0.70 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +1.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.6% |
EHC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NHC leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
NHC vs EHC vs PNTG vs ADUS vs CCRN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NHC or EHC or PNTG or ADUS or CCRN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Pennant Group, Inc.
(PNTG) is the stronger pick with 36. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 6% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN). Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) offers the better valuation at 18. 7x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Encompass Health Corporation (EHC) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NHC or EHC or PNTG or ADUS or CCRN?
On trailing P/E, Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) is the cheapest at 18.
7x versus The Pennant Group, Inc. at 42. 5x. On forward P/E, Addus HomeCare Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Addus HomeCare Corporation wins at 0. 70x versus The Pennant Group, Inc. 's 2. 68x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NHC or EHC or PNTG or ADUS or CCRN?
Over the past 5 years, National HealthCare Corporation (NHC) delivered a total return of +162.
1%, compared to -22. 5% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADUS returned +399. 9% versus CCRN's -10. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NHC or EHC or PNTG or ADUS or CCRN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Encompass Health Corporation (EHC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
40β versus The Pennant Group, Inc. 's 0. 79β — meaning PNTG is approximately 97% more volatile than EHC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 121% for The Pennant Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NHC or EHC or PNTG or ADUS or CCRN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Pennant Group, Inc.
(PNTG) is pulling ahead at 36. 3% versus -21. 6% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. (CCRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Encompass Health Corporation grew EPS 24. 2% year-over-year, compared to -565. 9% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PNTG leads at 26. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NHC or EHC or PNTG or ADUS or CCRN?
Encompass Health Corporation (EHC) is the more profitable company, earning 9.
5% net margin versus -9. 0% for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EHC leads at 17. 7% versus -0. 3% for CCRN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EHC leads at 95. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NHC or EHC or PNTG or ADUS or CCRN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 70x versus The Pennant Group, Inc. 's 2. 68x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Addus HomeCare Corporation (ADUS) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 133. 8x for Cross Country Healthcare, Inc. — 119. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EHC: 42. 8% to $153. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NHC or EHC or PNTG or ADUS or CCRN?
In this comparison, NHC (1.
4% yield), EHC (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. PNTG, ADUS, CCRN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NHC or EHC or PNTG or ADUS or CCRN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Encompass Health Corporation (EHC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
40), 0. 6% yield, +252. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EHC: +252. 2%, CCRN: -10. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NHC and EHC and PNTG and ADUS and CCRN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NHC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EHC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PNTG is a small-cap high-growth stock; ADUS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CCRN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NHC, EHC pay a dividend while PNTG, ADUS, CCRN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.