NIU
Niu Technologies
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$249M
5Y Perf.-84.8%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
NIU vs XPEV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
XPEV
XPeng Inc.
Auto - Manufacturers
Market Cap$5.42B
5Y Perf.-24.1%
NIU vs XPEV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | NIU | XPEV |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Manufacturers | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $249M | $5.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.45B | $60.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $-4.28B |
| Gross Margin | 18.9% | 15.7% |
| Operating Margin | -1.7% | -8.9% |
| Forward P/E | 2.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $201M | $15.94B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $630M | $18.59B |
NIU vs XPEV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
NIU
XPEV
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niu Technologies (NIU) | 100 | 15.2 | -84.8% |
| XPeng Inc. (XPEV) | 100 | 75.9 | -24.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NIU vs XPEV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: NIU leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. XPeng Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
NIU
Niu Technologies
The Income Pick
NIU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.21
- Lower volatility, beta 1.21, Low D/E 21.6%, current ratio 1.31x
- Beta 1.21, current ratio 1.31x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
XPEV
XPeng Inc.
The Growth Play
XPEV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 33.2%, EPS growth 48.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.9%
- -26.7% 10Y total return vs NIU's -63.7%
- 33.2% revenue growth vs NIU's 24.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | XPEV | 33.2% revenue growth vs NIU's 24.0% |
| Quality / Margins | NIU | -0.5% margin vs XPEV's -7.1% |
| Stability / Safety | NIU | Beta 1.21 vs XPEV's 1.39, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NIU | -9.2% vs XPEV's -18.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NIU | -0.8% ROA vs XPEV's -5.0%, ROIC -37.7% vs -16.9% |
NIU vs XPEV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
NIU vs XPEV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLNIULAGGINGXPEV
XPEVXPeng Inc.
1leads
NIUNiu Technologies
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs XPEVMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
NIU5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
NIU2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
NIU6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
XPEV4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
NIU2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NIU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XPEV is the larger business by revenue, generating $60.3B annually — 13.5x NIU's $4.5B. NIU is the more profitable business, keeping -0.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XPEV's -7.1%. On growth, XPEV holds the edge at +125.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | NIUNiu Technologies | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.5B | $60.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$43M | -$3.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | -$4.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +15.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | -8.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | -7.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.1% | -10.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +65.4% | +125.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +63.2% |
NIU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
NIU leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | NIUNiu Technologies | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $249M | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $186M | $5.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.76x | -17.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 2.49x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.51x | 0.90x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.82x | 3.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
NIU leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NIU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NIU delivers a -2.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-14 for XPEV. NIU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XPEV's 0.51x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NIU scores 5/9 vs XPEV's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | NIUNiu Technologies | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | -13.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.8% | -5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -37.7% | -16.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -24.1% | -14.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$430M | -$2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $630M | $18.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $201M | $15.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.21x | -10.29x |
NIU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XPEV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in XPEV five years ago would be worth $5,826 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $999 for NIU. Over the past 12 months, NIU leads with a -9.2% total return vs XPEV's -18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XPEV at 13.8% vs NIU's -5.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | NIUNiu Technologies | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | -23.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -9.2% | -18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.1% | +47.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.0% | -41.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.7% | -26.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.3% | +13.8% |
XPEV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NIU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NIU is the less volatile stock with a 1.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than XPEV's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | NIUNiu Technologies | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.67 | $28.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.71 | $15.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.4% | +55.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.4 | 40.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 429K | 6.4M |
NIU leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NIU as "Buy" and XPEV as "Buy".
| Metric | NIUNiu Technologies | XPEVXPeng Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $25.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
NIU leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). XPEV leads in 1 (Total Returns).
Best OverallNiu Technologies (NIU)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
NIU vs XPEV: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NIU or XPEV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, XPeng Inc.
(XPEV) is the stronger pick with 33. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 24. 0% for Niu Technologies (NIU). Analysts rate Niu Technologies (NIU) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NIU or XPEV?
Over the past 5 years, XPeng Inc.
(XPEV) delivered a total return of -41. 7%, compared to -90. 0% for Niu Technologies (NIU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: XPEV returned -26. 7% versus NIU's -63. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NIU or XPEV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Niu Technologies (NIU) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
21β versus XPeng Inc. 's 1. 39β — meaning XPEV is approximately 15% more volatile than NIU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Niu Technologies (NIU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 51% for XPeng Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NIU or XPEV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), XPeng Inc.
(XPEV) is pulling ahead at 33. 2% versus 24. 0% for Niu Technologies (NIU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: XPeng Inc. grew EPS 48. 7% year-over-year, compared to 29. 5% for Niu Technologies. Over a 3-year CAGR, XPEV leads at 24. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NIU or XPEV?
Niu Technologies (NIU) is the more profitable company, earning -5.
9% net margin versus -14. 2% for XPeng Inc. — meaning it keeps -5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NIU leads at -7. 6% versus -16. 3% for XPEV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NIU leads at 15. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — NIU or XPEV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is NIU or XPEV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Niu Technologies (NIU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
21)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NIU: -63. 7%, XPEV: -26. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NIU and XPEV?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(NIU: 65.4% · XPEV: 125.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.