Security & Protection Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NL vs KALU vs CODI vs HBB vs SXI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aluminum
Conglomerates
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Industrial - Machinery
NL vs KALU vs CODI vs HBB vs SXI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Security & Protection Services | Aluminum | Conglomerates | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $294M | $2.86B | $905M | $276M | $3.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $159M | $3.70B | $1.85B | $595M | $869M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-34M | $153M | $-227M | $28M | $54M |
| Gross Margin | 31.1% | 10.2% | 38.7% | 26.8% | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.8% | 6.6% | 0.3% | 6.6% | 15.1% |
| Forward P/E | 6.9x | 18.7x | 150.4x | 12.8x | 30.8x |
| Total Debt | $500K | $1.12B | $1.88B | $42M | $604M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $114M | $7M | $68M | $47M | $105M |
NL vs KALU vs CODI vs HBB vs SXI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NL Industries, Inc. (NL) | 100 | 192.0 | +92.0% |
| Kaiser Aluminum Cor… (KALU) | 100 | 245.5 | +145.5% |
| Compass Diversified (CODI) | 100 | 70.9 | -29.1% |
| Hamilton Beach Bran… (HBB) | 100 | 215.1 | +115.1% |
| Standex Internation… (SXI) | 100 | 507.2 | +407.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NL vs KALU vs CODI vs HBB vs SXI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 9.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 7.77x
- Beta 0.87, yield 9.5%, current ratio 7.77x
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 30.8x)
KALU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 11.5%, EPS growth 135.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.5%
- PEG 0.62 vs SXI's 4.40
- 11.5% revenue growth vs HBB's -7.3%
- +169.4% vs CODI's -30.3%
Among these 5 stocks, CODI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HBB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for efficiency.
- 7.4% ROA vs NL's -9.1%, ROIC 14.0% vs 3.9%
SXI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 247.8% 10Y total return vs NL's 226.1%
- 6.2% margin vs NL's -21.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.5% revenue growth vs HBB's -7.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 30.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.2% margin vs NL's -21.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs HBB's 1.95, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.5% yield, vs SXI's 0.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +169.4% vs CODI's -30.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.4% ROA vs NL's -9.1%, ROIC 14.0% vs 3.9% |
NL vs KALU vs CODI vs HBB vs SXI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NL vs KALU vs CODI vs HBB vs SXI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SXI leads in 1 of 6 categories
HBB leads 1 • KALU leads 1 • NL leads 0 • CODI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SXI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KALU is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 23.3x NL's $159M. SXI is the more profitable business, keeping 6.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NL's -21.5%. On growth, KALU holds the edge at +42.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $159M | $3.7B | $1.8B | $595M | $869M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15M | $368M | $109M | $44M | $161M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$34M | $153M | -$227M | $28M | $54M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $24M | $10M | $8M | $52M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.1% | +10.2% | +38.7% | +26.8% | +40.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | +6.6% | +0.3% | +6.6% | +15.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.5% | +4.1% | -12.3% | +4.7% | +6.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +0.7% | +0.5% | +1.4% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.7% | +42.4% | -5.9% | -8.6% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.0% | +183.2% | -5.1% | +100.0% | +152.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NL and HBB each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, HBB trades at a 82% valuation discount to SXI's 57.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KALU offers better value at 0.86x vs SXI's 8.28x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $294M | $2.9B | $905M | $276M | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $180M | $4.0B | $2.7B | $270M | $3.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.81x | 26.02x | -3.94x | 10.53x | 57.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.91x | 18.74x | 150.38x | 12.84x | 30.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.86x | — | — | 8.28x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.47x | 12.68x | 14.99x | 6.37x | 23.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.86x | 0.85x | 0.48x | 0.45x | 4.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.78x | 3.54x | 1.58x | 1.51x | 4.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 24.99x | 78.84x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HBB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KALU delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-50 for CODI. NL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CODI's 3.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KALU scores 6/9 vs SXI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.7% | +18.7% | -49.6% | +16.2% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.1% | +5.9% | -7.3% | +7.4% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.9% | +7.8% | +1.0% | +14.0% | +9.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.9% | +9.4% | +2.4% | +13.7% | +10.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 1.36x | 3.27x | 0.23x | 0.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$113M | $1.1B | $1.8B | -$5M | $499M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $114M | $7M | $68M | $47M | $105M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $500,000 | $1.1B | $1.9B | $42M | $604M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -19.20x | 4.84x | -0.97x | 55.74x | 3.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KALU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SXI five years ago would be worth $27,029 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,447 for CODI. Over the past 12 months, KALU leads with a +169.4% total return vs CODI's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KALU at 43.2% vs CODI's -9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | +47.7% | +158.7% | +29.1% | +19.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.3% | +169.4% | -30.3% | +50.9% | +76.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.2% | +193.5% | -25.6% | +114.9% | +104.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.8% | +40.7% | -35.5% | +1.6% | +170.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +226.1% | +135.1% | +53.7% | -22.6% | +247.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.7% | +43.2% | -9.4% | +29.0% | +26.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NL and KALU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NL is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HBB's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KALU currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs NL's 64.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 1.71x | 1.09x | 1.95x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.27 | $183.00 | $17.46 | $21.80 | $283.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.04 | $65.69 | $4.58 | $12.72 | $144.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.8% | +96.3% | +68.9% | +94.2% | +94.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.2 | 74.2 | 70.0 | 54.4 | 52.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 37K | 248K | 1.2M | 25K | 195K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NL and SXI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NL as "Sell", KALU as "Hold", CODI as "Hold", HBB as "Hold", SXI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.7% upside for CODI (target: $15) vs -9.2% for KALU (target: $160). For income investors, NL offers the higher dividend yield at 9.48% vs SXI's 0.47%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | $160.00 | $15.00 | — | $304.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 22 | 14 | 1 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.5% | +1.8% | +4.2% | +2.3% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.57 | $3.09 | $0.50 | $0.48 | $1.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | +3.3% | +0.3% |
SXI leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). HBB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
NL vs KALU vs CODI vs HBB vs SXI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NL or KALU or CODI or HBB or SXI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) is the stronger pick with 11.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 3% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB). Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Standex International Corporation (SXI) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NL or KALU or CODI or HBB or SXI?
On trailing P/E, Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) is the cheapest at 10.
5x versus Standex International Corporation at 57. 8x. On forward P/E, NL Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Kaiser Aluminum Corporation wins at 0. 62x versus Standex International Corporation's 4. 40x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NL or KALU or CODI or HBB or SXI?
Over the past 5 years, Standex International Corporation (SXI) delivered a total return of +170.
3%, compared to -35. 5% for Compass Diversified (CODI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SXI returned +247. 8% versus HBB's -22. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NL or KALU or CODI or HBB or SXI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NL Industries, Inc.
(NL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company's 1. 95β — meaning HBB is approximately 123% more volatile than NL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NL Industries, Inc. (NL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Compass Diversified — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NL or KALU or CODI or HBB or SXI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) is pulling ahead at 11.
5% versus -7. 3% for Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kaiser Aluminum Corporation grew EPS 135. 9% year-over-year, compared to -1426. 1% for Compass Diversified. Over a 3-year CAGR, SXI leads at 2. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NL or KALU or CODI or HBB or SXI?
Standex International Corporation (SXI) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
1% net margin versus -23. 9% for NL Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SXI leads at 15. 4% versus 2. 3% for CODI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODI leads at 38. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NL or KALU or CODI or HBB or SXI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Kaiser Aluminum Corporation (KALU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Standex International Corporation's 4. 40x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NL Industries, Inc. (NL) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 150. 4x for Compass Diversified — 143. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CODI: 24. 7% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NL or KALU or CODI or HBB or SXI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NL Industries, Inc. (NL) offers the highest yield at 9. 5%, versus 0. 5% for Standex International Corporation (SXI).
09Is NL or KALU or CODI or HBB or SXI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NL Industries, Inc.
(NL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 9. 5% yield, +226. 1% 10Y return). Hamilton Beach Brands Holding Company (HBB) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NL: +226. 1%, HBB: -22. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NL and KALU and CODI and HBB and SXI?
These companies operate in different sectors (NL (Industrials) and KALU (Basic Materials) and CODI (Industrials) and HBB (Consumer Cyclical) and SXI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KALU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CODI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HBB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SXI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. NL, KALU, CODI, HBB pay a dividend while SXI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.