Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NMG vs MP vs UUUU vs LAC vs SGML
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial Materials
Uranium
Industrial Materials
Industrial Materials
NMG vs MP vs UUUU vs LAC vs SGML — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Industrial Materials | Uranium | Industrial Materials | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $334M | $12.28B | $5.80B | $1.37B | $2.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $305M | $85M | $0.00 | $160M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-132M | $-71M | $-70M | $-241M | $-37M |
| Gross Margin | — | 8.3% | 37.3% | — | 16.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -36.4% | -108.3% | — | -12.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 274.3x | — | — | 26.7x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $1.04B | $676M | $23M | $254M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $106M | $1.17B | $65M | $594M | $66M |
NMG vs MP vs UUUU vs LAC vs SGML — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nouveau Monde Graph… (NMG) | 100 | 141.8 | +41.8% |
| MP Materials Corp. (MP) | 100 | 693.4 | +593.4% |
| Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU) | 100 | 1547.0 | +1447.0% |
| Lithium Americas Co… (LAC) | 100 | 180.3 | +80.3% |
| Sigma Lithium Corpo… (SGML) | 100 | 2022.4 | +1922.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NMG vs MP vs UUUU vs LAC vs SGML
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, NMG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.40
- Rev growth 35.1%, EPS growth 12.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -19.5%
- Beta 1.40, current ratio 7.24x
- 35.1% revenue growth vs LAC's -6.0%
UUUU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +391.8% vs NMG's +19.5%
LAC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.42, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 10.33x
- 1.4% margin vs UUUU's -82.7%
SGML is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 14.9% 10Y total return vs UUUU's 10.0%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.1% revenue growth vs LAC's -6.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.4% margin vs UUUU's -82.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.40 vs NMG's 1.89 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +391.8% vs NMG's +19.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.0% ROA vs NMG's -81.9%, ROIC -4.7% vs -0.1% |
NMG vs MP vs UUUU vs LAC vs SGML — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NMG vs MP vs UUUU vs LAC vs SGML — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SGML leads in 2 of 6 categories
NMG leads 0 • MP leads 0 • UUUU leads 0 • LAC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SGML leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MP and LAC operate at a comparable scale, with $305M and $0 in trailing revenue. SGML is the more profitable business, keeping -23.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UUUU's -82.7%. On growth, UUUU holds the edge at +112.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $305M | $85M | $0 | $160M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | -$43M | -$94M | -$32M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$132M | -$71M | -$70M | -$241M | -$37M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$64M | -$314M | -$87M | -$648M | -$32M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +8.3% | +37.3% | — | +16.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -36.4% | -108.3% | — | -12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -23.3% | -82.7% | — | -23.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -102.8% | -102.5% | — | -20.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +49.1% | +112.1% | — | +36.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | +121.4% | +64.2% | -21.4% | +67.7% |
Valuation Metrics
SGML leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $334M | $12.3B | $5.8B | $1.4B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $270M | $12.2B | $6.4B | $801M | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4730.07x | -138.26x | -63.14x | -26.95x | -51.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 274.33x | — | — | 26.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 295.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 44.59x | 87.96x | — | 17.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.09x | 4.92x | 7.96x | 1.20x | 27.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NMG and MP each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MP delivers a -3.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-3 for NMG. LAC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SGML's 1.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MP scores 4/9 vs SGML's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | -3.7% | -10.2% | -26.9% | -44.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -81.9% | -2.0% | -6.5% | -16.6% | -10.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | -4.7% | -8.5% | -7.1% | -1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | -4.2% | -10.5% | -3.9% | -1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.44x | 0.99x | 0.02x | 1.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$87M | -$123M | $611M | -$571M | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $106M | $1.2B | $65M | $594M | $66M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $1.0B | $676M | $23M | $254M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -98.52x | -2.80x | — | — | -1.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — UUUU and SGML each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SGML five years ago would be worth $54,136 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,823 for NMG. Over the past 12 months, UUUU leads with a +391.8% total return vs NMG's +19.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UUUU at 56.9% vs LAC's -23.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.0% | +25.8% | +40.0% | +18.7% | +66.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.5% | +192.7% | +391.8% | +84.4% | +236.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.1% | +221.7% | +286.1% | -55.6% | -37.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.8% | +149.7% | +272.6% | -31.3% | +441.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.9% | +591.3% | +996.7% | +234.9% | +1494.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.6% | +47.6% | +56.9% | -23.7% | -14.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MP and SGML each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MP is the less volatile stock with a 1.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NMG's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SGML currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs NMG's 34.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 1.40x | 1.85x | 1.42x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.06 | $100.25 | $27.90 | $10.52 | $24.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.60 | $18.64 | $4.20 | $2.47 | $4.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.3% | +69.0% | +83.7% | +53.8% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.7 | 66.8 | 62.1 | 69.1 | 71.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 5.6M | 10.1M | 9.0M | 3.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NMG as "Buy", MP as "Buy", UUUU as "Buy", LAC as "Hold", SGML as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 176.4% upside for NMG (target: $6) vs -23.9% for SGML (target: $18).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.75 | $78.25 | $24.08 | $7.00 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 11 | 8 | 15 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SGML leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 3 categories are tied.
NMG vs MP vs UUUU vs LAC vs SGML: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NMG or MP or UUUU or LAC or SGML a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the stronger pick with 35. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). Analysts rate Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NMG or MP or UUUU or LAC or SGML?
Over the past 5 years, Sigma Lithium Corporation (SGML) delivered a total return of +441.
4%, compared to -81. 8% for Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SGML returned +1495% versus NMG's -31. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NMG or MP or UUUU or LAC or SGML?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 40β versus Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning NMG is approximately 35% more volatile than MP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 191% for Sigma Lithium Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — NMG or MP or UUUU or LAC or SGML?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is pulling ahead at 35. 1% versus -15. 6% for Energy Fuels Inc. (UUUU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MP Materials Corp. grew EPS 12. 3% year-over-year, compared to -757. 1% for Lithium Americas Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UUUU leads at 74. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — NMG or MP or UUUU or LAC or SGML?
Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc.
(NMG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -129. 9% for Energy Fuels Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NMG leads at 0. 0% versus -153. 4% for UUUU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SGML leads at 21. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is NMG or MP or UUUU or LAC or SGML more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sigma Lithium Corporation (SGML) trades at 26.
7x forward P/E versus 274. 3x for MP Materials Corp. — 247. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMG: 176. 4% to $5. 75.
07Which pays a better dividend — NMG or MP or UUUU or LAC or SGML?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is NMG or MP or UUUU or LAC or SGML better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sigma Lithium Corporation (SGML) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1495% 10Y return).
Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SGML: +1495%, NMG: -31. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between NMG and MP and UUUU and LAC and SGML?
These companies operate in different sectors (NMG (Basic Materials) and MP (Basic Materials) and UUUU (Energy) and LAC (Basic Materials) and SGML (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; UUUU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LAC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SGML is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.