Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NMG vs SGML
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial Materials
NMG vs SGML — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $334M | $2.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $160M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-132M | $-37M |
| Gross Margin | — | 16.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -12.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.7x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $254M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $106M | $66M |
NMG vs SGML — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nouveau Monde Graph… (NMG) | 100 | 142.5 | +42.5% |
| Sigma Lithium Corpo… (SGML) | 100 | 2231.1 | +2131.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NMG vs SGML
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NMG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- EPS growth -4.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.89, Low D/E 12.3%, current ratio 2.43x
- -0.0% margin vs SGML's -23.3%
SGML carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.61
- 14.9% 10Y total return vs NMG's -31.9%
- Beta 1.61, current ratio 0.85x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% revenue growth vs NMG's -111.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.0% margin vs SGML's -23.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.61 vs NMG's 1.89 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +236.4% vs NMG's +19.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -10.9% ROA vs NMG's -81.9%, ROIC -1.4% vs -0.1% |
NMG vs SGML — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SGML leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SGML and NMG operate at a comparable scale, with $160M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $160M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$132M | -$37M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$64M | -$32M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +16.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -23.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -20.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +36.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | +67.7% |
Valuation Metrics
NMG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $334M | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $270M | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4730.07x | -51.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 295.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 17.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.09x | 27.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NMG leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SGML delivers a -44.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-45 in annual profit, vs $-3 for NMG. NMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SGML's 1.91x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | -44.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -81.9% | -10.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | -1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | -1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 1.91x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$87M | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $106M | $66M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $254M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -98.52x | -1.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SGML leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SGML five years ago would be worth $54,136 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,823 for NMG. Over the past 12 months, SGML leads with a +236.4% total return vs NMG's +19.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SGML at -14.4% vs NMG's -16.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.0% | +66.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.5% | +236.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.1% | -37.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.8% | +441.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.9% | +1494.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.6% | -14.4% |
Risk & Volatility
SGML leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SGML is the less volatile stock with a 1.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NMG's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SGML currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs NMG's 34.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.06 | $24.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.60 | $4.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.3% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.7 | 71.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 3.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NMG as "Buy" and SGML as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 176.4% upside for NMG (target: $6) vs -23.9% for SGML (target: $18).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.75 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SGML leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). NMG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency).
NMG vs SGML: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NMG or SGML a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc.
(NMG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NMG or SGML?
Over the past 5 years, Sigma Lithium Corporation (SGML) delivered a total return of +441.
4%, compared to -81. 8% for Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SGML returned +1495% versus NMG's -31. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NMG or SGML?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sigma Lithium Corporation (SGML) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
61β versus Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. 's 1. 89β — meaning NMG is approximately 17% more volatile than SGML relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 191% for Sigma Lithium Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — NMG or SGML?
Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc.
(NMG) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -33. 5% for Sigma Lithium Corporation — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NMG leads at 0. 0% versus -3. 0% for SGML. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SGML leads at 21. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is NMG or SGML more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMG: 176.
4% to $5. 75.
06Which pays a better dividend — NMG or SGML?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is NMG or SGML better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sigma Lithium Corporation (SGML) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1495% 10Y return).
Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SGML: +1495%, NMG: -31. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NMG and SGML?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SGML is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare SGML vs LAC
LAC is one of the most direct listed alternatives to SGML.
Compare NMG vs MP
MP overlaps with NMG in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With LAC + ALB
LAC and ALB are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.