Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NMG vs TSLA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Manufacturers
NMG vs TSLA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Auto - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $334M | $1.55T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $97.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-132M | $3.88B |
| Gross Margin | — | 19.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 213.0x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $8.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $106M | $16.51B |
NMG vs TSLA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nouveau Monde Graph… (NMG) | 100 | 142.5 | +42.5% |
| Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) | 100 | 739.7 | +639.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NMG vs TSLA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NMG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.89
- EPS growth -4.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.89, Low D/E 12.3%, current ratio 2.43x
TSLA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 28.6% 10Y total return vs NMG's -31.9%
- -2.9% revenue growth vs NMG's -111.5%
- 4.0% margin vs NMG's -0.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -2.9% revenue growth vs NMG's -111.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.0% margin vs NMG's -0.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.89 vs TSLA's 2.06 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.1% vs NMG's +19.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.9% ROA vs NMG's -81.9%, ROIC 4.5% vs -0.1% |
NMG vs TSLA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
NMG vs TSLA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSLA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSLA and NMG operate at a comparable scale, with $97.9B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $97.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | $9.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$132M | $3.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$64M | $7.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +19.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +7.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +15.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | +11.9% |
Valuation Metrics
NMG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $334M | $1.55T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $270M | $1.54T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4730.07x | 381.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 212.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 9.84x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 146.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 16.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.09x | 17.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 248.44x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TSLA leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TSLA delivers a 4.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-3 for NMG. TSLA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NMG's 0.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSLA scores 6/9 vs NMG's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +4.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -81.9% | +2.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$87M | -$8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $106M | $16.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -98.52x | 17.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TSLA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TSLA five years ago would be worth $18,375 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,823 for NMG. Over the past 12 months, TSLA leads with a +49.1% total return vs NMG's +19.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSLA at 33.8% vs NMG's -16.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.0% | -6.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.5% | +49.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.1% | +139.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.8% | +83.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.9% | +2856.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.6% | +33.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NMG and TSLA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NMG is the less volatile stock with a 1.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSLA's 2.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSLA currently trades 82.6% from its 52-week high vs NMG's 34.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.89x | 2.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.06 | $498.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.60 | $271.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.3% | +82.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.7 | 59.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 61.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NMG as "Buy" and TSLA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 176.4% upside for NMG (target: $6) vs 9.4% for TSLA (target: $450).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.75 | $450.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TSLA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NMG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NMG vs TSLA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NMG or TSLA a better buy right now?
Tesla, Inc.
(TSLA) offers the better valuation at 381. 3x trailing P/E (213. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — NMG or TSLA?
Over the past 5 years, Tesla, Inc.
(TSLA) delivered a total return of +83. 7%, compared to -81. 8% for Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. (NMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSLA returned +28. 6% versus NMG's -31. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — NMG or TSLA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc.
(NMG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 89β versus Tesla, Inc. 's 2. 06β — meaning TSLA is approximately 9% more volatile than NMG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 12% for Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — NMG or TSLA?
Tesla, Inc.
(TSLA) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSLA leads at 4. 6% versus 0. 0% for NMG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TSLA leads at 18. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Is NMG or TSLA more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMG: 176.
4% to $5. 75.
06Which pays a better dividend — NMG or TSLA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is NMG or TSLA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nouveau Monde Graphite Inc.
(NMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) carries a higher beta of 2. 06 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NMG: -31. 9%, TSLA: +28. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between NMG and TSLA?
These companies operate in different sectors (NMG (Basic Materials) and TSLA (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.